|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 6:02 pm
This thread is for students who are conducting research at thier college or instatution. Feel free to post your research and discuss it here, and feel free to ask questions about other's research.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 21, 2005 9:34 pm
This isn't something that I researched personally, but was a project of one of my fellow classmates. There have been studies done that show that the color of words causes miscalculations in their meanings when flashed for short periods on a screen. For example, positive words flashed in a dark font were more often mispercieved than positive words in a light font. My fellow classmate decided to take this concept and apply it to another level.
Instead of using font color, she used the position of the word on the screen. She would flash words at the top or bottom of the screen. Those flashed at the bottom would have more judgement errors than those flashed at the top. Interesting, ne? Has some implications for marketing and logo design, dosen't it?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2005 2:24 pm
I am not part of a college on an institution, but I am currently working on my own research of linguistics and finding the link between languages and world perspectives of different religions, nations, and peoples. I disagree with Noam Chomsky and the Sapir-Worf Hypothesis.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 9:46 am
super_nerd42 I am not part of a college on an institution, but I am currently working on my own research of linguistics and finding the link between languages and world perspectives of different religions, nations, and peoples. I disagree with Noam Chomsky and the Sapir-Worf Hypothesis. Does your research look into the developement of language? That might be an interesting angle for you to approach. Chmosky's got his own ideas, but so do alot of other notable psychologist such as Piaget and Skinner.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 3:48 pm
I finished my prior research project about lie detection training, and next year I'll begin my Master's programme which will also be on lying and lie detection. But my interest this time is to see what determines if a person will lie better or worse, or differently put, which factors favor the appearance of deception signals. Literature shows that most deception signals are linked to emotion, and so my hypothesis is that people leak deception because they have been consistently punished throughout their lives for lying.
Makes sense? I'm not sure about which procedure I'm going to use, though.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 2:23 pm
I don't need no outside motivator to conduct psychological research! I have humans here!
Research 1 (I really did them)
Stimulated the subjects genitalia while he was watching pictures of fat cats. After some time whenever he watched a picture of a fat cat he began to have a sexual response. The strange thing is that it didn't generalize on normal cats, but just on pictures of cats.
Research 2 I've discovered that people are 100% not logical. One of the main foreces human operate is cultural conditioning. Just today someone said "You're a mouse!", because he thought it was cool. There was nothing logical in that. The only thing that caused him to do that was the conditioning of his friend
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 23, 2006 5:56 am
*feels stupid arround the people who are conducting research* I'm not doing any research at the moment.... I'm just picking up other people's theories and adding on to them with my own ideas... sweatdrop
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 2:12 am
Hello Recently I made researche on how the level of extraversion (E) and introversion(I) infualces the relationship duration. I was wondering what people think about this. Do people create couples on the basis of diversity or similarity? which relation ships would lats longest? E&E, I&I or I&E?
well the results were quite interesting. The mean of a relationship was about 23 months. The longest relationsships were achived by I&I (46 months!) so quite impressive. so the law of similarity seems to be the key. but we haven't get the same results for E&E it was obout 22 months. the same results for the mixed couples. However the was a majority of mixed couples.all the results were statisticly significant.
we don't really know the reasons for such results but we think that two E can get bored with each other while I don't meet so many people. This may be the reason why they don't change partners so often. But these are only assumptions.
the sample was quite big (39 couples). We even followed the rules of randomization
Any comments? Maybe some similar studies?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 4:46 pm
Musubi P. Research 1 (I really did them) Stimulated the subjects genitalia while he was watching pictures of fat cats. After some time whenever he watched a picture of a fat cat he began to have a sexual response. The strange thing is that it didn't generalize on normal cats, but just on pictures of cats. Its a 'classic' case of classical conditioning with no sign of stimulus generalization.... out of curiosity, what made you do this study?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 4:47 pm
I am currently doing research into alternative treatments & holistic medicine for use in psychological disorders.
I currently am limited to surveys and case studies, but I hope to get a full experiment underway within the next 2 years....I just need the university backing and funding.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 7:20 am
I'm not at a univeristy yet but I've done some research in psychology. My project dealt with eye movement and thought modalities. Basically you can tell how (not what) people are thinking by eye movement. For example if you look to the side you are thinking auditorly. Or if you look upwards you are thinking visually.
I also found that if (you are right handed) you look left you are remembering something and if you look to the right you are constructing (not necessaryly lying) something. Left handed people generally do the opposite.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|