Comments

View All Comments

Khunn Report | 08/02/2009 9:20 am

When I think of where we have been and the paths we have traveled, the enormity of our journey strikes me.
When I reach out and touch you, the journey seems but an instant and time stands still. Glorious ecstasy fills me then as the moment stretches out.
Though it only seems as moments as we touch throughout the passing days, to me, we have lived countless lifetimes.

Each day is a new adventure.
A new love for you.

fishyseaz V2 Report | 08/01/2009 10:12 am

Hi.

Llandygai Report | 07/14/2009 8:10 pm

Forgive my ignorance of Canadian acronyms, but... "JP"? "Justice of the Peace"? ""Just Peachy"? "Jam Prophet"? I assume it's the first. In any case, I think I get what you're saying.

So...there aren't little courthouse marriages in Canada, or just in your province? Either way, that's another thing I wasn't aware of. I guess you learn something new every day.

In any case, now that I understand your situation, yeah, it makes much more sense why you'd go the route you did. That said, I suspect that if you did want a free wedding, you might be able to get a Mormon bishop to do it for you, even if you weren't Mormon. But that's just a guess (an educated one, though), so take that with some salt.

I guess I was just assuming that Canada was more like Great Britain than like the US, and I met some folks in Britain who did/considered doing the private ceremony in a local courthouse.

But... yeah. I wouldn't advise anyone to be a hypocrite anyway. That said, I've met plenty of people in my short time who claimed one denomination or other, and yet rarely attended, so... maybe "active" is a relative term, when it comes to church attendance? wink

Llandygai Report | 07/14/2009 1:42 pm

So, that begs the question: if you've already arranged your own "trap," and if you're already considered "married" by family and government... what persuaded you to go that route instead of just getting a "standard" marriage (even just a courthouse marriage)?

Llandygai Report | 07/14/2009 7:10 am

Ah, so it's a common law marriage. Right, I had forgotten that Canada did that (or at least some of the provinces). I should have figured as much, because it's incredibly common in Britain, from what I experienced, at least.

I still haven't quite grasped the concept, though, that people can live together for decades, raise children, and live as if they *were* married, and yet still claim a fear that officially getting married would somehow ruin things. I've come up with a small list of reasons--and they make a certain sort of sense--but if you could help me understand that better, it would do much to help me solve a problem that has had me perplexed since '97.

It's always good to get additional perspective; I'm such a myopic idiot sometimes.

Llandygai Report | 07/14/2009 5:55 am

I *believe* you were the one commenting in the "marriage is unnecessary" thread, and you talked about how you've basically gotten yourselves into a marital arrangement--complete with you using his last name, and having power of attorney, etc. without actually *getting* married.

Anyway, you're only 36. That's not old at all. But if there are legitimate medical conditions, then, yeah, maybe a hospital birth would be a good idea in your case.

Llandygai Report | 07/13/2009 9:35 am

Ah, free thinking. We need more of that. You made the best case for a marriage-substitute relationship I think I've ever heard, so regardless my personal opinion, I take my hat off to you for having a solid understanding of your own position. smile

My wife had homebirths with children 4 and 5, but a midwife was only present for child #4. #5 came out the same way he got in; just the two of us alone in the bedroom. wink

We're working on our 6th.

Anyway, it's a pleasure to meet you, such as it is. smile

HoneyRoasted Report | 06/26/2009 1:24 am

You sound really cool, especially from your profile. Just letting you know :]

Queen Lidi Report | 06/20/2009 5:02 pm

lol ya...i ended up giving the thread over to someone else because i have too much on my plate recently to uphold a guild. i have my college, my Lottery, and my up and coming art shop to take care of. i had to quit all of my guilds that i owned and participated in. I believe the owner is still Chaotic jester of Envy.

And i will add you with this one and my new main. her name is Aukah ^ ^

Queen Lidi Report | 06/20/2009 9:19 am

lol it probably wasnt 4 years. but we were together for a little over four years. i cant remember when i met you too. ^ ^
im glad you remembered us though.

And i believe you were pregnant with a boy at the time.
you were the one who gave me confidence about being a sub, and made me realize how much i want to be a stay at home sub and wife. ^ ^
believe it or not, this isnt my main anymore. i use this account for my Lottery, but we can still talk with her if youd like. ^ ^