Welcome to Gaia! ::


Anarchy is defined by the Websters dictionary as a state of lawlessness and political disorder due to a lack of government. This may seem like a terrible state to be in and I won't flat out dispute that claim. But let me ask you this is it really as bad as you think it is. Now wait before you back out of this topic, let me just tell you I am not one of those people who boldly claim that a world plunged forever into the depths of anarchy it a grand and novel idea. No not at all.

Anarchy is a state in which the very soul and nature of man is allowed to roam free and wild doing whatever it pleases without any repercussions whatsoever. Which is all fine and dandy as long as you are not the one that is being roamed upon. In a world of anarchy you can expect murder, rape, theft, and yes believe it or not name calling to be common place events. Worst of all if you suddenly become fat from supersizing to many of your McDonalds meals there will be no courts to make you a millionare at the expense of McDonalds. Horrible isn't it.

But as much as I make fun of the above I would not be interested in seeing an extended period of anarchy fall over the world.

So whats my point? It is this. Anarchy is a required part of the order of the world. Lofty ideas like democracy have no power in a world that knows no anarchy. Good cannot exist without evil despite peoples claims. People are brought into the world expecting to be pampered in a world of over protective governments. They do not bow before order but expect order to bow before them.

This is where the practicality of anarchy comes in. People need to be reminded occassionally what a government is supposed to do. When they see rape and murder happening all around them without repercussions they will once again realize what a government is for. It is not there to listen to the petty whining of people who have every opportunity to take care of themselves but choose not to. It is there to protect them from the greater evils of human nature.

When order prevails too long it begins to exhaust itself and fall into the realms of overprotection which believe it or not is just as disastrous as underprotection. What the world needs is to be constantly dynamic. To be able to fall into anarchy and rise up into order just to fall back and renew the cycle. To much of either order or disorder will destroy just the same.


*For those who are unclear about what I am trying to say here I made another post below that I hope clarifies things*
I'm glad I read your whole post before I started going off on you.

I understand that it is a fact that the world will fall into disarray. It will not go completely nuts, however.
People need leaders. They need someone to look up to, to understand, to let them rule them. When a world, country, city, goes totally berserk, people will go back to their families. They will make a headmaster in order to achieve order. Humans CANNOT live without order, no matter how ugly it gets. If it isn't families, it is neighborhoods. It is religious groupings. They will come together for the good of their friends and family.

A man's soul may not feel his own repercussions. Let us take a moment here and roleplay: A man, living in this world of anarchy, of disarray, and lawlessness, has a mental disorder. He likes it when he has sex with a woman who is screaming for help and who is screaming in pain. Now let's say that mister no-repercussion sees a fine looking lady would is hot when she screams. He decides, OKAY, I'll go tap that one without her consent or will.
Now, maybe this woman is married, maybe she lives at home with her parents and her siblings, or has a family of her own. The woman is raped by mister no-r. She is either severely wounded, mentally and physically, or she is dead. Let's now assume that her father, mother, brother, husband, son want revenge. They feel anger, they are consumed with sadness and bitterness. The woman, and her family are desecrated and ruined forever. They feel nothing but pain and anger at this incident.
BUT Mr No-r is feeling good. He got what he wanted. He likes this anarchic world. Who will prosecute him? NOBODY! Government? HA! right...

Don't go around spreading word of a world where everyone could hypothetically live out their fantasies. I direct you below, now that I'm all irritated.

No Government.... That is what you wrote in a posting. But, oh wait, we should follow 'guidelines'... Like a law? Are we to live in a place where we each treat each other with no differentiation? Who will keep the bad eggs in place? Maybe a police force? Ordered by whom? There is no government to bring the community together, to help the people plan to build and create and grow. Will we have no trade? I suppose we must live on what our own country can grow and establish... oh wait a minute... Country? With no government there can be no such thing. Wars? Of course not! Why would anyone think of something as stupid as a war when we are living together in peace! we don't need an army... Especially with no government to sponsor and no taxes to pay for it. Borders will be unnecessary. Noone wants to fight over borders, noone believes that they are superior. All religions live in world of acceptance.

Sorry for blowing out on you, but don't you think there have been people who have tried? Israel wanted to be a secular society where everyone was the same. No secrets. Everyone lived with everybody else. Do you think the worked? The kids wanted to live in the city, but the adults couldn't keep tabs on them!! How do they know that their kids are living with a mindset of total acceptance in order to avoid a government.
Here is the tricky part: The kids will want to live with their parents! They love everything their parents do for them, and they follow in their footsteps. No animosity, no anger, no superiority in order to make the government obsolete...

Let me know if you think this would ever happen on any planet inhabited by humans.


hrrm maybe I am not so good at writing these long posts because my point seems to have missed you. But I do not blame you for it I blame myself. And what I wrote above probably deserves the blowing out you gave it although my original idea woudn't have.

Okay if you will let me clarify. I 100% agree with what you wrote. I have no desire to live in a world of anarchy. I am really sorry if my above post made it seem that way. i just wanted to say that people have no appreciation for government. They use it and abuse it. I wanted to say that anarchy is nessessary(IN SMALL DOSES) to purge society of these thoughts and to straighten it out. To create a more appreciated order.

Once again I would like to apologize for getting you all riled up. Hopefully this will allay your fears of my ideas and if it doesn't than there is no helping it. I never meant to say that I wanted a world of anarchy.
Kalimaa

People need leaders. They need someone to look up to, to understand, to let them rule them. When a world, country, city, goes totally berserk, people will go back to their families. They will make a headmaster in order to achieve order. Humans CANNOT live without order, no matter how ugly it gets. If it isn't families, it is neighborhoods. It is religious groupings. They will come together for the good of their friends and family.


Prove it.

Kalimaa
A man's soul may not feel his own repercussions. Let us take a moment here and roleplay: A man, living in this world of anarchy, of disarray, and lawlessness, has a mental disorder. He likes it when he has sex with a woman who is screaming for help and who is screaming in pain. Now let's say that mister no-repercussion sees a fine looking lady would is hot when she screams. He decides, OKAY, I'll go tap that one without her consent or will.
Now, maybe this woman is married, maybe she lives at home with her parents and her siblings, or has a family of her own. The woman is raped by mister no-r. She is either severely wounded, mentally and physically, or she is dead. Let's now assume that her father, mother, brother, husband, son want revenge. They feel anger, they are consumed with sadness and bitterness. The woman, and her family are desecrated and ruined forever. They feel nothing but pain and anger at this incident.
BUT Mr No-r is feeling good. He got what he wanted. He likes this anarchic world. Who will prosecute him? NOBODY! Government? HA! right...


That is not anarchy - it's chaos. The two are different things.

Kalimaa
No Government.... That is what you wrote in a posting. But, oh wait, we should follow 'guidelines'... Like a law? Are we to live in a place where we each treat each other with no differentiation? Who will keep the bad eggs in place? Maybe a police force? Ordered by whom? There is no government to bring the community together, to help the people plan to build and create and grow. Will we have no trade? I suppose we must live on what our own country can grow and establish... oh wait a minute... Country? With no government there can be no such thing. Wars? Of course not! Why would anyone think of something as stupid as a war when we are living together in peace! we don't need an army... Especially with no government to sponsor and no taxes to pay for it. Borders will be unnecessary. Noone wants to fight over borders, noone believes that they are superior. All religions live in world of acceptance.


Is this a pointless rant or an actual argument?

Kalimaa
Sorry for blowing out on you, but don't you think there have been people who have tried? Israel wanted to be a secular society where everyone was the same. No secrets. Everyone lived with everybody else. Do you think the worked? The kids wanted to live in the city, but the adults couldn't keep tabs on them!! How do they know that their kids are living with a mindset of total acceptance in order to avoid a government.


Analogical reasoning proves nothing.

Kalimaa
Here is the tricky part: The kids will want to live with their parents! They love everything their parents do for them, and they follow in their footsteps. No animosity, no anger, no superiority in order to make the government obsolete...

Let me know if you think this would ever happen on any planet inhabited by humans.


Prove why it wouldn't.
You're using the entirely wrong definition of anarchy for a political discussion.

Political anarchy is:

According to Mirriam-Webster, definition 3:

Mirriam-Webster
Anarchism: a political theory holding all forms of governmental authority to be unnecessary and undesirable and advocating a society based on voluntary cooperation and free association of individuals and groups.


According to Wikipedia, definition 4:

Wikipedia
Anarchy: Societal harmony through voluntary cooperation. (In contrast to the following "Political disorder and confusion" 'meaning').


That's just the start of it; political anarchism is a much more complex idea. Please, please, please, don't contribute to further misconceptions of political anarchism by muddying the waters like this.

Quick Reply

Submit
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum