|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 8:19 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 10:00 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:56 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 3:41 pm
|
|
|
|
Oniko-inuki Sleepless Kasaki ... I believe that our minds do in fact have the possibility of strengths that we can't control, like the ability to solve a Calculus equation in 5 seconds with just thinking. .... The brain is capable of amazing things but some of those amazing things come at the cost of other more mundane functions, as can be seen in 'idiot savant' where a developmental disorder results in the brain focusing on one particular talent to the exclusion of all else.
Yes but we don't nececarily know exactly what causes one to be a sevant. For all we know, it could just be a hormone imablance, witch gives benefits to some functions, and disables others, however it doesn't nececarily mean that somone can't reach the intelligence of a sevant without ruinging other parts of their brain.
The way I see it It works like this.
If I wanted to to telekenesis then I think I could. Tele-distant, and Kenesis-movement, put together, means to move something from far away. Therefore, if I want to move something from far away, I'd just use my arm.
That is an application of a concous function of the mind. We can controll these kinds of things, because we don't have to controll alot with our concous mind.
The subconcous uses alot of energy, but it doesn't wonder why.
If we were concous of every process going on in our brain, however, then we'd use up alot of energy thinking about it, and contemplating it.
It's too much to focus on concously, but it can be done subconcously.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 7:15 am
|
|
|
|
27x Oniko-inuki Sleepless Kasaki ... I believe that our minds do in fact have the possibility of strengths that we can't control, like the ability to solve a Calculus equation in 5 seconds with just thinking. .... The brain is capable of amazing things but some of those amazing things come at the cost of other more mundane functions, as can be seen in 'idiot savant' where a developmental disorder results in the brain focusing on one particular talent to the exclusion of all else. Yes but we don't nececarily know exactly what causes one to be a sevant. For all we know, it could just be a hormone imablance, witch gives benefits to some functions, and disables others, however it doesn't nececarily mean that somone can't reach the intelligence of a sevant without ruinging other parts of their brain.
Okay, bad example. Lets look at brain trauma. Sometime what is lost can be regained by the brain building alternate pathways or utilizing different parts for new functions, sometimes what is lost never comes back. The point I am trying to make is that I think that there is a limit to the pathways that we can handle using. Use a pathway more often it becomes stronger and we are more inclined to use it again. Use a pathway less often it becomes weaker and eventually dissapears.
To build up certain pathways to such extreames takes time and effort, time and effort that is not spent on other pathways, therefore you may be able to build up some parts of the brain but at the cost of others.
27x The way I see it It works like this. If I wanted to to telekenesis then I think I could. Tele-distant, and Kenesis-movement, put together, means to move something from far away. Therefore, if I want to move something from far away, I'd just use my arm.
That's a new usage for telekenesis biggrin
27x That is an application of a concous function of the mind. We can controll these kinds of things, because we don't have to controll alot with our concous mind. The subconcous uses alot of energy, but it doesn't wonder why. If we were concous of every process going on in our brain, however, then we'd use up alot of energy thinking about it, and contemplating it. It's too much to focus on concously, but it can be done subconcously.
Even if we had to do everything consciously I bet that it wouldn't be long before we developed a subconscious; haven't you ever done some simple repetitive task for so long that you simply quit thinking about it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 1:55 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 1:23 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 9:01 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:33 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 10:09 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:10 am
|
|
|
|
Niniva 27x On the other hand, perhaps God keeps us from being able to do these things because we would be more difficult to controll. This is akin to the "good reason" I spoke of earlier, accept I didn't appeal to any higher power. The reason could be simply cause and affect, such as if we COULD tap these "powers" of sorts then apathy may run rampant, immorality would insue....things that we are either not ok with and or not ready for. That types of things. Could be God, could be any number of other possibilities. Well I may be wrong, but I believe that if not god, then fate, keeps us from becomeing too powerfull.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:55 am
|
|
|
|
27x Niniva 27x On the other hand, perhaps God keeps us from being able to do these things because we would be more difficult to controll. This is akin to the "good reason" I spoke of earlier, accept I didn't appeal to any higher power. The reason could be simply cause and affect, such as if we COULD tap these "powers" of sorts then apathy may run rampant, immorality would insue....things that we are either not ok with and or not ready for. That types of things. Could be God, could be any number of other possibilities. Well I may be wrong, but I believe that if not god, then fate, keeps us from becomeing too powerfull.
I'm not entirely certain I know what that word "fate" is reffering to. But if it is refering to some deterministic factors then we don't really have a mind at all anyway so we cannot "tap" into it since we have no real tride and true free will to actuall "act" anyway....but that is a conversation for another time in another thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 3:39 pm
|
|
|
|
Niniva 27x Niniva 27x On the other hand, perhaps God keeps us from being able to do these things because we would be more difficult to controll. This is akin to the "good reason" I spoke of earlier, accept I didn't appeal to any higher power. The reason could be simply cause and affect, such as if we COULD tap these "powers" of sorts then apathy may run rampant, immorality would insue....things that we are either not ok with and or not ready for. That types of things. Could be God, could be any number of other possibilities. Well I may be wrong, but I believe that if not god, then fate, keeps us from becomeing too powerfull. I'm not entirely certain I know what that word "fate" is reffering to. But if it is refering to some deterministic factors then we don't really have a mind at all anyway so we cannot "tap" into it since we have no real tride and true free will to actuall "act" anyway....but that is a conversation for another time in another thread.
By fate I mean the lack of free will; the idea that everything will happen a certian way.
I peronally believe that either there is a good, or there is a fate that keeps us from our free will.
That's entirely subjective though; purely speculation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|