|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 2:52 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:11 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:26 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 9:32 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:06 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 1:15 pm
|
|
|
|
I have a question.
I've been working on a character for use in a post-apocalyptic zombie roleplay. Putting it as simply as I can, she's a zombie that's managed to retain her intellect. She did this by keeping her brain oxygenated after her body died up until the point it revived. This character operates on the assumption that it's cerebral anoxia, total deprivation of oxygen to the brain, that results in the brain damage that renders zombies unintelligent, impulsive, aggressive, clumsy, and constantly hungry.
From a writer's perspective, she's an experiment, an opportunity for me to explore the other side of the conflict between the living and the living dead. I'm especially curious to see how other characters will react to her. After all, one of the things that makes zombies easy to kill is the fact that they're no longer human. But what if they were? What then? What would people do if they couldn't get away with killing a zombie guilt-free?
I'll understand if you reject this idea, but I'm hoping you will keep an open mind and at least consider it.
Thank you for your time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 1:59 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 2:09 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 3:38 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 3:49 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:11 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:33 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:42 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:15 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:17 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|