|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:26 pm
Cajmera The problem with that is that, following this concept, one person could plausibly be entered with and have stake in several couple. For example, suppose that Meeki entered a couple...and then ten other people entered the raffle with ten of her Soquilis as the mate. She'd have 11 couples in the raffle, which comes off as more than a little unfair. This came up last month and got dealt with then, but obviously the wording of that requirement didn't get changed *hates all this confusion* That would actually be unfair to me. >.> Because say that happened, I could only keep ONE basket and would have to give the other 10 away which would suck a**. Edit: Well at least those that 'won'. XD
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:27 pm
Cajmera The problem with that is that, following this concept, one person could plausibly be entered with and have stake in several couple. For example, suppose that Meeki entered a couple...and then ten other people entered the raffle with ten of her Soquilis as the mate. She'd have 11 couples in the raffle, which comes off as more than a little unfair. This came up last month and got dealt with then, but obviously the wording of that requirement didn't get changed *hates all this confusion* i understand that's possible but what are the chances of it? Serisouly?
Either way it's going to be unfair to someone but i'd think it would make more since to make if better for people who've put the time into getting/rping many Soq rather than thoes who've only invested in one (personal opinion, if ou dont like it i dont give a s**t)
I personaly find it complete s**t that if i had more than one Soq in a relationship i would have to wait until each one of them got a breeding, which could take months and months, before i could try with another. It woudl be a lot smarter to cap it a like 2 or 3 Soq person in a raffle rather than one.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:27 pm
TheMadHatter Cajmera @Mia: According to the co-ownership agreement of Harley Quinn, Lora would be getting the basket from the first breeding...so I counted her as entered twice since she's the active owner, not Skye 3nodding Lorako gets ONE and Skye gets ONE so skye would be getting more than one basket if Joker/Harley and Remy/Kitara both one but what are the chances of that?Wouldn't you get a basket, though? Their co-ownership agreement says that Lora would get the basket from the first breeding and Skye from the second, so unless there were 3 baskets Skye WOULDN'T be getting a basket from that one. Unless I read the agreement wrong, which is possible.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:29 pm
Cajmera TheMadHatter Cajmera @Mia: According to the co-ownership agreement of Harley Quinn, Lora would be getting the basket from the first breeding...so I counted her as entered twice since she's the active owner, not Skye 3nodding Lorako gets ONE and Skye gets ONE so skye would be getting more than one basket if Joker/Harley and Remy/Kitara both one but what are the chances of that?Wouldn't you get a basket, though? Their co-ownership agreement says that Lora would get the basket from the first breeding and Skye from the second, so unless there were 3 baskets Skye WOULDN'T be getting a basket from that one. Unless I read the agreement wrong, which is possible. yes, Skye just told me this cause my brain completely ignored the fact that i own Joker XD. But Lorako's got another enterrred which she woudl be keeping a basket from so it still stands that if the rule that you can only have one soq entered stand's Joker and Harley have to be pulled
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:31 pm
Pretty much... If there were only two baskets Lorako would get one and Hatter would get one... Should their be a third basket -and- we managed to get a slot for Remy/Kitara I'd forfeit my basket in favor of an RP contest for someone to take over the extra foal. We don't have anyone lined up to recieve our babies and, as we've talked about for plot reasons, we'd rather have reliable RP'ers playing the children of our Soq's than people who might possibly butcher the characters as some have seen happen in the past. XD;
*fluffs Hatter* Calm down, dear. No sense in causing a ruckus when we've already got it figured out between us, at least. heart
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:31 pm
To be completely honest. The only breeding system I have seen that keeps everyone happy is in SoA - you rp and get a certain amount of rps you get to breed, that way its like a little gift for rping.
If those who dont rp still wanna breed raffle them off.. but keep it open for those who rp, SoA sometimes get flooded by breedings but not that often. It works well and isn't all that much more work either.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:32 pm
*snugs Skye*
Looks like I'll have to check the raffle when I get home from work at this rate. Once again good luck to everyone, and I hope the rule can be clarified.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:33 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:34 pm
I can understand your point, Hatter, but I'll still be agreeing to disagree. Either way, there's no point in hashing things out in this thread anymore; so let us all wait for Sirenz's decision *snugs everyone waiting*
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:36 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:36 pm
*snugs Caj and waves to Sayuri, Hatter, Mia, Meeki, Shar Skye, Remove*
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:37 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:38 pm
*hopes the drawing occurs before she has to go to work* :3
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:39 pm
*lurks on the ceiling and waits*
*wves to rein*
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:40 pm
*waves to Rein*
*snugs Sayuri*
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|