|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 7:33 pm
Maybe if you save the in-character part for something like how you have the Agent's Quarters. At the top of the Containment thread, have them list their profile, the one that you have listed right now. And in the sentiment thread, instead of having it be in in-character, make it out of character. An actual list of people.
Make sense?
I kind of confused myself with that one
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 10:16 pm
a_diic_T I O N
If you check the time on my posts, you'd see that I stopped posting that long ago. I posted reserved in case there's need to add to the thread. A Q/A, a Faq, an info post, etc etc. I don't need to be mocked by the VC for trying to help. Especially when I'm adding one of the most basic threads to the guild, which obviously, you didn't think of.
You're right, and you have my apologies. Ignorance is no excuse for rudeness, and I thank you for helping out so much. It's good to see quite a bit of life springing in to the guild, from both you and -Chronic Angels-. Thank you very much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kain M ShZual Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 10:37 pm
I think I speak for the both of us when I use, don't mention it.
But I have another question.
Are we allowed to role play on the main forum?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 10:42 pm
Hat-tori -Chronic Angels- Why is there no user name spot on the profile skeletons? It's nice to know whose character we're looking at when we go into the Data base Ah, a good point. The 'database' is actually an in-character section, therefore, a username spot would seem very out of place. But you're right, I'll figure out a way around this... Create a separate piece for individuals to fill out upon entering in a character for approval (the first character only, of course) that more or less contains OOC info, such as Name and Characters Being Played. Somethin' like that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kain M ShZual Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 11:12 pm
Kain M ShZual Hat-tori -Chronic Angels- Why is there no user name spot on the profile skeletons? It's nice to know whose character we're looking at when we go into the Data base Ah, a good point. The 'database' is actually an in-character section, therefore, a username spot would seem very out of place. But you're right, I'll figure out a way around this... Create a separate piece for individuals to fill out upon entering in a character for approval (the first character only, of course) that more or less contains OOC info, such as Name and Characters Being Played. Somethin' like that.
Or maybe just put their usernames in parenthesis at the bottom of the profile?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 12:38 am
That too.
Or.... idea. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 3:48 pm
I realized that the guild has a lot of sub forums that would be updated quite frequently; such as Agent's Assignments and such. Well, seeing as there is no way for members to tell if anything has been updated, besides going through every single forum and checking each thread, why not have a thread on the main forum?
Just a Announcement sort of thing. Every time something is updated, it gets posted in that thread. I could slap it together if you like, it shouldn't be too hard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:44 pm
a_diic_T I O N
I realized that the guild has a lot of sub forums that would be updated quite frequently; such as Agent's Assignments and such. Well, seeing as there is no way for members to tell if anything has been updated, besides going through every single forum and checking each thread, why not have a thread on the main forum?
Just a Announcement sort of thing. Every time something is updated, it gets posted in that thread. I could slap it together if you like, it shouldn't be too hard.I agree. So long as Tori gives the OK, you, by all means, have permission to help out yet again if you so wish.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kain M ShZual Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 11:39 pm
This thread should actually be in the Main Forum...
And I guess I'll start on the announcement Thread as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 2:02 pm
-Chronic Angels- I think I speak for the both of us when I use, don't mention it. But I have another question. Are we allowed to role play on the main forum? The main forum is the 'base' floor, or the ground floor. so yes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 1:11 pm
Perhaps we could, you know, become more SCP-ish?
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-4444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 1:30 pm
Ah, the old Wiki continues its childish and silly smear campaign.
We've already established that this guild has very little to do with the SCP wiki, really. At best, we're a canonical alternate dimension.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 1:36 pm
Eh, what I'm saying is that you're not creepy. You're superhero-y. And Mary-Sue-y.
So please quit acting that way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 4:37 pm
And here I thought we'd see NEW material! Silly freakin' me.
Does the AIM look to be creepy? It's BASED off of...bored of explaining. But hey, if you wanna see something creepy n' hear some creepy shtuffs, LEMME KNOW!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kain M ShZual Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 7:14 pm
Unconfirmed Reptile Eh, what I'm saying is that you're not creepy. You're superhero-y. And Mary-Sue-y. So please quit acting that way. The main problem in keeping the Wiki's 'feel' is death, lethality, insanity... what gives it that extra dimension over ours is the fact that SCP are untamable, lethal things of mystery. Translating this to roleplay is nigh-impossible. The only thing I vaguely kept was the Sites, and even that is different. The Wiki's right: We're like some weird alternate dimension here! So if you want to make one that' s more 'authentic', be my guest!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
