|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:45 pm
Silvrtide shifty_842 Let N. Korea test their nukes. If they try anything, we'll come back at them an apocolypse. and we want an apocalypse? think for a minute about what youre saying. An apocolypse on their country. Not world wide.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:00 am
do the math!
nukes=fallout
fallout+wind=death fot all
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:49 pm
Capt. Confusticus do the math! nukes=fallout fallout+wind=death fot all not nessesarily. most of the radioactive material will be gone before it ever even hits the ground after the explosion. all that will be left is pretty much just the carbon-14 and some other elements that have half-lives of about a million years. and those have been around us since the dawn of time allready. there will be more than usual, but they still wont carry far from where the bomb drops--if the weather is right. even if the weather isnt right, the fallout will still be limited. @ shifty: please use "sir".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 8:22 pm
Plus, hydrogen bombs are not as radioactive as modern nukes. Sure they're old but hey, whatever works right?
*Silvrtide- What do you mean?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 1:56 pm
shifty_842 Plus, hydrogen bombs are not as radioactive as modern nukes. Sure they're old but hey, whatever works right? *Silvrtide- What do you mean? You are expected to read the boot camp sticky as a member.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 9:06 pm
Oh I see. Yes sir, sorry sir.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 4:23 pm
shifty_842 Oh I see. Yes sir, sorry sir. No problem, just remember to do it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 8:13 pm
Silvrtide shifty_842 I don't trust them one bit ,but until we can do what they can, we need to be-friend them. Once we can down their satelites, then to hell with them and their idiotic economy. As cold as that seems, if the US operated that way, we'd probably be alot more intimidating as a nation. there would be no need to. china can simply not function without us, and if korea ever tried anything that hurt us, do you know whos back china would have? ours. still, we do need to watch them. we know they have nukes as well, but the chances of them actually using them is minimal. what about when we helped south korea, China attacked us then whos to say they wouldnt do it again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 2:59 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 8:31 pm
The Future U.S.Marine Silvrtide shifty_842 I don't trust them one bit ,but until we can do what they can, we need to be-friend them. Once we can down their satelites, then to hell with them and their idiotic economy. As cold as that seems, if the US operated that way, we'd probably be alot more intimidating as a nation. there would be no need to. china can simply not function without us, and if korea ever tried anything that hurt us, do you know whos back china would have? ours. still, we do need to watch them. we know they have nukes as well, but the chances of them actually using them is minimal. what about when we helped south korea, China attacked us then whos to say they wouldnt do it again. ever heard the phrase, "that was then"? the times have changed. china wasnt as dependent on us as they are now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:24 pm
Why are we focusing only on China and N. Korea? What if they both go against us? We need to start thinking about who we CAN trust and fight with. For example, can we allie with the Russians before they do? Just look what we are doing, we're in tunnel vision, we're anly focusing on two potential threats, do you get what I'm saying?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:44 pm
srgt. Sosuke Sagara Why are we focusing only on China and N. Korea? What if they both go against us? We need to start thinking about who we CAN trust and fight with. For example, can we allie with the Russians before they do? Just look what we are doing, we're in tunnel vision, we're anly focusing on two potential threats, do you get what I'm saying? please read the previous posts before you say anything. and were allready pretty much allied with russia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:09 am
what i don't get is how commies in north korea call it the democratic peoples republic of korea
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:35 pm
Capt. Confusticus what i don't get is how commies in north korea call it the democratic peoples republic of koreaits all for propaganda.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 5:53 pm
Silvrtide Capt. Confusticus what i don't get is how commies in north korea call it the democratic peoples republic of koreaits all for propaganda. Exactly. That's why Russia was the United Soviet Socialist Republic. ((I'm pretty sure that's right.)) A cool name to fight for is all they have since they aren't really fighting for much else, sir.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
