|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 8:13 pm
Valko Valentine Check out the bold line:Days In Silence ~In an interview at fainme G-corp was pronounced dead by VO and L0che.
SykoSilver; "Are we done with corporations like G CORP and S CORP yet?"
Vo/L0cke; "G Corp is officially done, but the possible starting of other corporations depends on where the story goes."
I was reading through an interview I found on the sight- mostly for the battle system stuff, but I came across this section confirming that G-corp is never coming back. Sad really because G-corp has been there for us for the better part of 4 years, but you can not do anything about Gaia ambitions. ~  The bold like was added by the person who typed up the interview.
It means nothing.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 8:36 pm
Valko Valentine Check out the bold line:Days In Silence ~In an interview at fainme G-corp was pronounced dead by VO and L0che.
SykoSilver; "Are we done with corporations like G CORP and S CORP yet?"
Vo/L0cke; "G Corp is officially done, but the possible starting of other corporations depends on where the story goes."
I was reading through an interview I found on the sight- mostly for the battle system stuff, but I came across this section confirming that G-corp is never coming back. Sad really because G-corp has been there for us for the better part of 4 years, but you can not do anything about Gaia ambitions. ~
Look, kid. I don't care what was found, and where the kid said it came from.
This needs HARD proof. A video, or soemthing. Everyone knows they exist.
If you want to post things like this as if they were fact, then you'd BEST provide something to back it up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 7:41 am
New Vogue Child Valko Valentine Check out the bold line:Days In Silence ~In an interview at fainme G-corp was pronounced dead by VO and L0che.
SykoSilver; "Are we done with corporations like G CORP and S CORP yet?"
Vo/L0cke; "G Corp is officially done, but the possible starting of other corporations depends on where the story goes."
I was reading through an interview I found on the sight- mostly for the battle system stuff, but I came across this section confirming that G-corp is never coming back. Sad really because G-corp has been there for us for the better part of 4 years, but you can not do anything about Gaia ambitions. ~
Look, kid. I don't care what was found, and where the kid said it came from.
This needs HARD proof. A video, or soemthing. Everyone knows they exist.
If you want to post things like this as if they were fact, then you'd BEST provide something to back it up.
And Crimson, I was referring to the line that I resized, for emphasis, and to point your attention to that line. Not only that, but why the ******** would I think that people, in an interview, could speak in bold and underline?
And I think the fact that the admins said that other corporations might be starting means something.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:48 am
Silence doesn't supply a credible source. Therefore, until further notice his word is NOT valid.
Hell, i talked with Fleep to verify that Ling had in fact said that one of the lines of binary was nonsense, that she had never said which one. i'm going to try and contact him tomorrow and see if that interview is in fact valid. If Silence cannot provide his sources, it cannot be held credible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:47 am
Boy, you're annoying me.
I never said that you produced it "out of thin air".
First off, I know well it was in the first post, meaning it didn't need to be quoted.
In said first post, he was bashing it, and stating that there was no validity.
Furthermore, you felt the need to repost it on the same page, enlarging an already bolded line as if we were blind, and ignorant enough to maybe have missed it.
That, however, isn't important, just annoying.
What's truly irksome is that you posted it, calling our attention to it again, as if the thread started on it wasn't enough, and pointed the thing out as if it were factual.
You think that the quote is a fact, as obvious though your last post.
I was stating that the "fact" itself needs proof.
If you want to post something as fact, have the proof ready to back it up, no matter where the statement was before.
The point, as you may have gathered is that you should not post unfounded claims as fact without proof of anything to back you up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 1:01 pm
This was the main part of my original post, the part I personally wrote: Quote: I think that Koneko Koji is right on this one. G CORP may disappear to be replaced with a corporation of similar ideals. In my opinion, probably one that incorporates Zurg technology with G CORP research.
If I was using it for a purpose in my post, why the ******** wouldn't it need to be quoted? It makes things easier and makes what I'm trying to say clearer and less confusing.
Look, I don't think it's neccessarily fact. I just think that its odd that you would attack me for using it, when you clearly misunderstood my post. Now that's annoying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 1:53 pm
You guys need to be friendlier.
Remember.
We're talking about made up stories on the internet.
=P
But really, I don't think there is any discussion here except what we can speculate, because we can't prove that the interview is true or untrue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:29 am
Hmmm.... was just re-reading through the archives and came across this page: X catagorically states he got the syringe full of liquid from LabTech123 - AFTER the Silent Flash Protocol when the experiment was started up again - this means that there is still a G-Corp Lab headed by LabTech123! G-Corp are (according to this assumption) NOT gone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 3:35 pm
So the attack on 123 ... was merely a robbery ...
meaning X COULD be working for a rival corporation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 3:39 pm
Wolfram Lee Ysud So the attack on 123 ... was merely a robbery ... meaning X COULD be working for a rival corporation. *cough* Von Helsons *cough*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 4:07 pm
Agent Manketsu Wolfram Lee Ysud So the attack on 123 ... was merely a robbery ... meaning X COULD be working for a rival corporation. *cough* Von Helsons *cough* I think that it would be more likely for him to be working independantly.
It just fits him better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 4:39 pm
Wolfram Lee Ysud So the attack on 123 ... was merely a robbery ... meaning X COULD be working for a rival corporation. Possibly; but who said anything about X attacking 123? twisted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 5:30 pm
Koneko Koji Wolfram Lee Ysud So the attack on 123 ... was merely a robbery ... meaning X COULD be working for a rival corporation. Possibly; but who said anything about X attacking 123? twisted They're in kahoots!
It was all staged!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 5:41 pm
Koneko Koji Wolfram Lee Ysud So the attack on 123 ... was merely a robbery ... meaning X COULD be working for a rival corporation. Possibly; but who said anything about X attacking 123? twisted O.O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 12:29 pm
Cashemere Cactus Said
That we Hadn't heard last of G corp yet..
In the GCD I saw it in one thread like 2 months ago.
So it's G corp isn't dead. domokun
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![[.Hermes.]'s avatar](https://a1cdn.gaiaonline.com/dress-up/avatar/ava/19/08/6a232baa460819_flip.png?t=1253684453_6.00_00)
