|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 4:17 pm
I'm doing alright, firebird. =^_^=
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 4:27 pm
ninja wait till what I have got planned for Miss Batneko... and Shinobi if Batneko told him already ninja
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:48 pm
Arkanik I'm doing alright, firebird. =^_^= That's cool. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:20 pm
*Sees Firebird's sig* So, what does everyone think of the trial so far? Seems to be just a lot of character stuff, to me... I wonder when they'll get to the REAL evidence...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 7:19 pm
I think it's rigged. They purposely gave him a newbie defence bot and a very experienced prosecution bot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 11:44 pm
firebird766 I think it's rigged. They purposely gave him a newbie defence bot and a very experienced prosecution bot. i agree but i think they did it that way so Ian would get more votes for innocent when the voting comes btw what are you guys voting?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 11:49 pm
gamemaniac511 firebird766 I think it's rigged. They purposely gave him a newbie defence bot and a very experienced prosecution bot. i agree but i think they did it that way so Ian would get more votes for innocent when the voting comes btw what are you guys voting? I'm waiting until the very end, so i can see all the evidence and facts come together. If they have a convincing enough case, i'll go 'guilty', if the defense is good, i'll go 'innocent'...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:14 am
Arkanik gamemaniac511 firebird766 I think it's rigged. They purposely gave him a newbie defence bot and a very experienced prosecution bot. i agree but i think they did it that way so Ian would get more votes for innocent when the voting comes btw what are you guys voting? I'm waiting until the very end, so i can see all the evidence and facts come together. If they have a convincing enough case, i'll go 'guilty', if the defense is good, i'll go 'innocent'... hmm i'm bordering on inncocent at the moment but the evidence could change at any moment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:27 pm
It's sounds like a Soap Opera to me... confused . Oh well.
The lack of bringing up some of those main problems that were found throughout the storyline updates is a little dissapointing, but this isn't over yet, so there's still hope?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 7:21 pm
Not MUCH hope, i'm afraid... Last i saw in there, next come the closing arguments. And then we vote. I'm disappointed in the lack of PHYSICAL evidence shown. Hell, that would get a REAL case thrown out right there... All they have is a picture of him THERE, a bottle, and a hell of a lot of character testimony....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 6:49 am
Arkanik Not MUCH hope, i'm afraid... Last i saw in there, next come the closing arguments. And then we vote. I'm disappointed in the lack of PHYSICAL evidence shown. Hell, that would get a REAL case thrown out right there... All they have is a picture of him THERE, a bottle, and a hell of a lot of character testimony.... yea...unfortunately we demand MORE evidence...and with us voting soon i guess we're not getting it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 11:58 am
Well, the prosecution never showed any proof that Ian was responsible for the fire, so... *Votes 'not guilty'*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:00 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:32 am
sweatdrop * try's to post a question but forgot wat it wass eek ohh noes !
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 1:06 pm
I voted innocent, too. It's not that I like Ian (I really don't), I just didn't want to be a tard and make him guilty for something I believe was not argued appropiately.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
