|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 8:16 pm
|
|
|
|
Ceribri Mourning Star Lucifer Ceribri Edit: (Heh, thanks. Oh, and "allie" is spelled 'ally'.. I won first and then second place in spelling bee in two different years at school... ^^) Yes, I haven't overlooked that yet. I would have been completely against Snape, but possibly by the UV, have trusted him..then again, there is this huge argument leaning heavily on them, and Harry has only heard of them once. So with the assumption that Dumbledore did not form a UV with Snape, I would say that you are right in that matter. I would want Snape dead, which would make me madder that I had to find all these little Horcruxes hidden. And seeing as to what happened with trying to retrieve the locket, I would say he's gonna have one heck of a fight against him. I also have to agree with the idea of Dumbledore leaving messages to Harry, placed in certain points by him before he died. Perhaps some of the teachers, such as McGonagall, were given something by Dumbledore to give to Harry after his death, or something of the sort. Even at this point, I would still want to murder Snape, no matter what Dumbledore says or writes. (On a side note, how old are you and how old do you think I am?) Sorry, my spelling leaves something to be desired. V_V" I'm assuming the bold HARRY is meant to be Dumbledore, and therefore be able to agree that the UV could limit Snapes actions, and possibly forcing him to do something "good". Not that Harry cares, and not that I blame him. This is going to contradict everything I've been trying to established but, this stupid thought crawled into my head and I just need to run it past someone. Ok, I know this is going to seem a little off but, remember how Snape wast the traitor who told Voldemort about the prophecy? Do you think Dumbledore trusts Snape because Dumbledore was the one who sent Snape to tell Voldemort about the Prophecy? Ok, and assuming that makes sense(which is a pretty BIG assumption)... Would it be possible that Dumbledore, knowing there was no way anyone could defeat the Dark Lord, took advantage of the prophecy to create a situation that would give the good guys a way to defeat Voldemort? Almost like, the prophecy was an answer to Dumbledores prayers, so he sent his double agent in, tipped the Dark Lord off with just enough info, and then waited for Voldemort to dig his own grave? ....Oh god, I hope that makes sense. (BTW, I'm almost 18 yrs old and yes, I'm freaking old so bleh. You'd be what, 15-16?) Uh, yes, it does make sense, but not true, I think. With what Dumbledore and Trelawney have told Harry before adds up to what says that neither of them knew Snape was eavesdropping untill he ran away after hearing part of the prophecy. Snape also came to Dumbledore asking for forgiveness and had seen the 'error of his ways' type thing. So I would have to say that since Snape wasn't a double agent yet, that theory wouldn't work. Oh, I am going to my school's spelling bee in a few weeks, and BTW I am only 13. ^^ Shocking, huh?
But that could be a cover up story. I mean, I wouldn't put it past Dumbledore to have a cover up story. Besides, how do you tell a 16 year old boy you concocted the death of his parents which indirectly lead to the incarseration of his god father?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 8:13 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 8:28 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 10:46 am
|
|
|
|
Mourning Star Lucifer Ceribri Mourning Star Lucifer Ceribri Edit: (Heh, thanks. Oh, and "allie" is spelled 'ally'.. I won first and then second place in spelling bee in two different years at school... ^^) Yes, I haven't overlooked that yet. I would have been completely against Snape, but possibly by the UV, have trusted him..then again, there is this huge argument leaning heavily on them, and Harry has only heard of them once. So with the assumption that Dumbledore did not form a UV with Snape, I would say that you are right in that matter. I would want Snape dead, which would make me madder that I had to find all these little Horcruxes hidden. And seeing as to what happened with trying to retrieve the locket, I would say he's gonna have one heck of a fight against him. I also have to agree with the idea of Dumbledore leaving messages to Harry, placed in certain points by him before he died. Perhaps some of the teachers, such as McGonagall, were given something by Dumbledore to give to Harry after his death, or something of the sort. Even at this point, I would still want to murder Snape, no matter what Dumbledore says or writes. (On a side note, how old are you and how old do you think I am?) Sorry, my spelling leaves something to be desired. V_V" I'm assuming the bold HARRY is meant to be Dumbledore, and therefore be able to agree that the UV could limit Snapes actions, and possibly forcing him to do something "good". Not that Harry cares, and not that I blame him. This is going to contradict everything I've been trying to established but, this stupid thought crawled into my head and I just need to run it past someone. Ok, I know this is going to seem a little off but, remember how Snape wast the traitor who told Voldemort about the prophecy? Do you think Dumbledore trusts Snape because Dumbledore was the one who sent Snape to tell Voldemort about the Prophecy? Ok, and assuming that makes sense(which is a pretty BIG assumption)... Would it be possible that Dumbledore, knowing there was no way anyone could defeat the Dark Lord, took advantage of the prophecy to create a situation that would give the good guys a way to defeat Voldemort? Almost like, the prophecy was an answer to Dumbledores prayers, so he sent his double agent in, tipped the Dark Lord off with just enough info, and then waited for Voldemort to dig his own grave? ....Oh god, I hope that makes sense. (BTW, I'm almost 18 yrs old and yes, I'm freaking old so bleh. You'd be what, 15-16?) Uh, yes, it does make sense, but not true, I think. With what Dumbledore and Trelawney have told Harry before adds up to what says that neither of them knew Snape was eavesdropping untill he ran away after hearing part of the prophecy. Snape also came to Dumbledore asking for forgiveness and had seen the 'error of his ways' type thing. So I would have to say that since Snape wasn't a double agent yet, that theory wouldn't work. Oh, I am going to my school's spelling bee in a few weeks, and BTW I am only 13. ^^ Shocking, huh? But that could be a cover up story. I mean, I wouldn't put it past Dumbledore to have a cover up story. Besides, how do you tell a 16 year old boy you concocted the death of his parents which indirectly lead to the incarseration of his god father? True, that makes loads of sense. If someone told me that, I would kill them on the spot. If we assume my last theory (last post) is true, then I would still want revenge, but maybe not as badly, if Snape actually was telling Dumbledore the truth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 1:35 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 6:15 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 1:07 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 4:23 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 9:36 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 8:02 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 8:03 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 8:06 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 8:09 pm
|
|
|
|
Ceribri Mourning Star Lucifer Ceribri Mourning Star Lucifer Ceribri Edit: (Heh, thanks. Oh, and "allie" is spelled 'ally'.. I won first and then second place in spelling bee in two different years at school... ^^) Yes, I haven't overlooked that yet. I would have been completely against Snape, but possibly by the UV, have trusted him..then again, there is this huge argument leaning heavily on them, and Harry has only heard of them once. So with the assumption that Dumbledore did not form a UV with Snape, I would say that you are right in that matter. I would want Snape dead, which would make me madder that I had to find all these little Horcruxes hidden. And seeing as to what happened with trying to retrieve the locket, I would say he's gonna have one heck of a fight against him. I also have to agree with the idea of Dumbledore leaving messages to Harry, placed in certain points by him before he died. Perhaps some of the teachers, such as McGonagall, were given something by Dumbledore to give to Harry after his death, or something of the sort. Even at this point, I would still want to murder Snape, no matter what Dumbledore says or writes. (On a side note, how old are you and how old do you think I am?) Sorry, my spelling leaves something to be desired. V_V" I'm assuming the bold HARRY is meant to be Dumbledore, and therefore be able to agree that the UV could limit Snapes actions, and possibly forcing him to do something "good". Not that Harry cares, and not that I blame him. This is going to contradict everything I've been trying to established but, this stupid thought crawled into my head and I just need to run it past someone. Ok, I know this is going to seem a little off but, remember how Snape wast the traitor who told Voldemort about the prophecy? Do you think Dumbledore trusts Snape because Dumbledore was the one who sent Snape to tell Voldemort about the Prophecy? Ok, and assuming that makes sense(which is a pretty BIG assumption)... Would it be possible that Dumbledore, knowing there was no way anyone could defeat the Dark Lord, took advantage of the prophecy to create a situation that would give the good guys a way to defeat Voldemort? Almost like, the prophecy was an answer to Dumbledores prayers, so he sent his double agent in, tipped the Dark Lord off with just enough info, and then waited for Voldemort to dig his own grave? ....Oh god, I hope that makes sense. (BTW, I'm almost 18 yrs old and yes, I'm freaking old so bleh. You'd be what, 15-16?) Uh, yes, it does make sense, but not true, I think. With what Dumbledore and Trelawney have told Harry before adds up to what says that neither of them knew Snape was eavesdropping untill he ran away after hearing part of the prophecy. Snape also came to Dumbledore asking for forgiveness and had seen the 'error of his ways' type thing. So I would have to say that since Snape wasn't a double agent yet, that theory wouldn't work. Oh, I am going to my school's spelling bee in a few weeks, and BTW I am only 13. ^^ Shocking, huh? But that could be a cover up story. I mean, I wouldn't put it past Dumbledore to have a cover up story. Besides, how do you tell a 16 year old boy you concocted the death of his parents which indirectly lead to the incarseration of his god father? True, that makes loads of sense. If someone told me that, I would kill them on the spot. If we assume my last theory (last post) is true, then I would still want revenge, but maybe not as badly, if Snape actually was telling Dumbledore the truth. I think that the reason dumby trusted snape is hidden away somewhere for the event that harry lived but dumby died so its all of his memorys and stuff of all the popeles like why he trusted snape???? and plus i think snape is actually deep down a good guy i am not saying killig dumby was good but i think some emotinal thing happend to him that is going to be reavealed in the 7th book oh well thats what i think surprised breathes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 11:39 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 9:56 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|