|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 2:48 pm
sybilus wow that sound super duper slow for the Rebel army's suits. You're talking about resistance fighters with black market dealings and stolen construction units fighting an army with full funding. Of course they're slow.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 7:09 pm
How is the U.S. cannon fodder? I mean compared to the UK we are, but still.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 1:25 am
Red_knightm How is the U.S. cannon fodder? I mean compared to the UK we are, but still. It's due to a few events in this war on terror. The US' response was to send as much as possible at the problem. The UK's response was to send our veterans over. The US' troops didnt have enough equipment to go around. The UK's troops brought everything they needed. The US' troops commonly got blown up and struggled to fight terrorism. The UK's troops had a lower death record, and saved the US' a** many a time. The US' general stated "If we had one tenth of their training, this war would be over by now." The UK's soldiers even have people who have gained the PURPLE HEART from such a small conflict. As you can see, the US seems to be using fodder in comparison to the UK's tactics.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 10:51 am
Ophiuchus sybilus wow that sound super duper slow for the Rebel army's suits. You're talking about resistance fighters with black market dealings and stolen construction units fighting an army with full funding. Of course they're slow. yup. especially with mace and axe. only good thing about them are that you don't have to refill the guns. XD wow, it sound like U.K is far superior in this war than the U.S in both moral and in equipment wise.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 10:58 am
Ophiuchus Red_knightm How is the U.S. cannon fodder? I mean compared to the UK we are, but still. It's due to a few events in this war on terror. The US' response was to send as much as possible at the problem. The UK's response was to send our veterans over. The US' troops didnt have enough equipment to go around. The UK's troops brought everything they needed. The US' troops commonly got blown up and struggled to fight terrorism. The UK's troops had a lower death record, and saved the US' a** many a time. The US' general stated "If we had one tenth of their training, this war would be over by now." The UK's soldiers even have people who have gained the PURPLE HEART from such a small conflict. As you can see, the US seems to be using fodder in comparison to the UK's tactics. Yeah.... I guess times are a changing, but thats a different topic. Do we need more designs for the UK and the US, and what happened to china and Russia? where are they in this?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 11:25 am
Red_knightm Ophiuchus Red_knightm How is the U.S. cannon fodder? I mean compared to the UK we are, but still. It's due to a few events in this war on terror. The US' response was to send as much as possible at the problem. The UK's response was to send our veterans over. The US' troops didnt have enough equipment to go around. The UK's troops brought everything they needed. The US' troops commonly got blown up and struggled to fight terrorism. The UK's troops had a lower death record, and saved the US' a** many a time. The US' general stated "If we had one tenth of their training, this war would be over by now." The UK's soldiers even have people who have gained the PURPLE HEART from such a small conflict. As you can see, the US seems to be using fodder in comparison to the UK's tactics. Yeah.... I guess times are a changing, but thats a different topic. Do we need more designs for the UK and the US, and what happened to china and Russia? where are they in this? ....china and russia are a part of the current war on terror? neutral I'm using the current affairs as a basis for a story.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 6:17 pm
Ophiuchus Red_knightm Ophiuchus Red_knightm How is the U.S. cannon fodder? I mean compared to the UK we are, but still. It's due to a few events in this war on terror. The US' response was to send as much as possible at the problem. The UK's response was to send our veterans over. The US' troops didnt have enough equipment to go around. The UK's troops brought everything they needed. The US' troops commonly got blown up and struggled to fight terrorism. The UK's troops had a lower death record, and saved the US' a** many a time. The US' general stated "If we had one tenth of their training, this war would be over by now." The UK's soldiers even have people who have gained the PURPLE HEART from such a small conflict. As you can see, the US seems to be using fodder in comparison to the UK's tactics. Yeah.... I guess times are a changing, but thats a different topic. Do we need more designs for the UK and the US, and what happened to china and Russia? where are they in this? ....china and russia are a part of the current war on terror? neutral I'm using the current affairs as a basis for a story. no.. but most suggest that within some time China and Russia, and india, will quickly develop and surpass U.S and U.K.. well at least that's what my soc.st teacher said. so if you're setting it up for the future, it might be a good idea to also consider them
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 1:55 pm
sybilus Ophiuchus Red_knightm Ophiuchus Red_knightm How is the U.S. cannon fodder? I mean compared to the UK we are, but still. It's due to a few events in this war on terror. The US' response was to send as much as possible at the problem. The UK's response was to send our veterans over. The US' troops didnt have enough equipment to go around. The UK's troops brought everything they needed. The US' troops commonly got blown up and struggled to fight terrorism. The UK's troops had a lower death record, and saved the US' a** many a time. The US' general stated "If we had one tenth of their training, this war would be over by now." The UK's soldiers even have people who have gained the PURPLE HEART from such a small conflict. As you can see, the US seems to be using fodder in comparison to the UK's tactics. Yeah.... I guess times are a changing, but thats a different topic. Do we need more designs for the UK and the US, and what happened to china and Russia? where are they in this? ....china and russia are a part of the current war on terror? neutral I'm using the current affairs as a basis for a story. no.. but most suggest that within some time China and Russia, and india, will quickly develop and surpass U.S and U.K.. well at least that's what my soc.st teacher said. so if you're setting it up for the future, it might be a good idea to also consider them First Gundam was based on a World War. Our story is to be based on the war on terror.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 3:20 pm
Ophiuchus Red_knightm Ophiuchus Red_knightm How is the U.S. cannon fodder? I mean compared to the UK we are, but still. It's due to a few events in this war on terror. The US' response was to send as much as possible at the problem. The UK's response was to send our veterans over. The US' troops didnt have enough equipment to go around. The UK's troops brought everything they needed. The US' troops commonly got blown up and struggled to fight terrorism. The UK's troops had a lower death record, and saved the US' a** many a time. The US' general stated "If we had one tenth of their training, this war would be over by now." The UK's soldiers even have people who have gained the PURPLE HEART from such a small conflict. As you can see, the US seems to be using fodder in comparison to the UK's tactics. Yeah.... I guess times are a changing, but thats a different topic. Do we need more designs for the UK and the US, and what happened to china and Russia? where are they in this? ....china and russia are a part of the current war on terror? neutral I'm using the current affairs as a basis for a story. Yeah I know, just what the hell are they going to be doing with giant weapons going about, just stay neutral or will they have MS' for theirselfs? I know you are taking current affairs, but still I'd think Mobile Suits would change things abit.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 5:06 am
Red_knightm Ophiuchus Red_knightm Ophiuchus Red_knightm How is the U.S. cannon fodder? I mean compared to the UK we are, but still. It's due to a few events in this war on terror. The US' response was to send as much as possible at the problem. The UK's response was to send our veterans over. The US' troops didnt have enough equipment to go around. The UK's troops brought everything they needed. The US' troops commonly got blown up and struggled to fight terrorism. The UK's troops had a lower death record, and saved the US' a** many a time. The US' general stated "If we had one tenth of their training, this war would be over by now." The UK's soldiers even have people who have gained the PURPLE HEART from such a small conflict. As you can see, the US seems to be using fodder in comparison to the UK's tactics. Yeah.... I guess times are a changing, but thats a different topic. Do we need more designs for the UK and the US, and what happened to china and Russia? where are they in this? ....china and russia are a part of the current war on terror? neutral I'm using the current affairs as a basis for a story. Yeah I know, just what the hell are they going to be doing with giant weapons going about, just stay neutral or will they have MS' for theirselfs? I know you are taking current affairs, but still I'd think Mobile Suits would change things abit. but then it wouldn't be based on current affairs, would it? Do you see china and russia running to our aid? ********, do you see the rest of NATO doing so either? They may well be building military use mobile suits due to the terrorist attacks as a defense mechanism, but they wouldn't get involved, just as they aren't getting involved now.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 9:07 am
Ophiuchus Red_knightm Ophiuchus Red_knightm Ophiuchus Red_knightm How is the U.S. cannon fodder? I mean compared to the UK we are, but still. It's due to a few events in this war on terror. The US' response was to send as much as possible at the problem. The UK's response was to send our veterans over. The US' troops didnt have enough equipment to go around. The UK's troops brought everything they needed. The US' troops commonly got blown up and struggled to fight terrorism. The UK's troops had a lower death record, and saved the US' a** many a time. The US' general stated "If we had one tenth of their training, this war would be over by now." The UK's soldiers even have people who have gained the PURPLE HEART from such a small conflict. As you can see, the US seems to be using fodder in comparison to the UK's tactics. Yeah.... I guess times are a changing, but thats a different topic. Do we need more designs for the UK and the US, and what happened to china and Russia? where are they in this? ....china and russia are a part of the current war on terror? neutral I'm using the current affairs as a basis for a story. Yeah I know, just what the hell are they going to be doing with giant weapons going about, just stay neutral or will they have MS' for theirselfs? I know you are taking current affairs, but still I'd think Mobile Suits would change things abit. but then it wouldn't be based on current affairs, would it? Do you see china and russia running to our aid? ********, do you see the rest of NATO doing so either? They may well be building military use mobile suits due to the terrorist attacks as a defense mechanism, but they wouldn't get involved, just as they aren't getting involved now. well the reason why these countries doesn't get involved was because they hated the image of U.S being the world dominant police. this situation will probably change as the world proceed, so it's arguable whether they will involve with the worldwide terror thing. yet, again, if you say it's based on current events, U.S will be the main player here. Although they particiate in the attempt to eliminate the terrorism, U.K.'s involvement is limited, comparing to U.S.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 2:47 pm
sybilus Ophiuchus Red_knightm Ophiuchus Red_knightm Yeah.... I guess times are a changing, but thats a different topic. Do we need more designs for the UK and the US, and what happened to china and Russia? where are they in this? ....china and russia are a part of the current war on terror? neutral I'm using the current affairs as a basis for a story. Yeah I know, just what the hell are they going to be doing with giant weapons going about, just stay neutral or will they have MS' for theirselfs? I know you are taking current affairs, but still I'd think Mobile Suits would change things abit. but then it wouldn't be based on current affairs, would it? Do you see china and russia running to our aid? ********, do you see the rest of NATO doing so either? They may well be building military use mobile suits due to the terrorist attacks as a defense mechanism, but they wouldn't get involved, just as they aren't getting involved now. well the reason why these countries doesn't get involved was because they hated the image of U.S being the world dominant police. this situation will probably change as the world proceed, so it's arguable whether they will involve with the worldwide terror thing. yet, again, if you say it's based on current events, U.S will be the main player here. Although they particiate in the attempt to eliminate the terrorism, U.K.'s involvement is limited, comparing to U.S. That's where you're wrong. While we don't throw thousands of cannon fodder at the problem, what we send MATTERS. Our death toll is about.... a TENTH that of the US one due to superior training, teamwork and equipment. Plus, we don't go around making indecent videos of captive civillians half as much as the US do. lol Anyway, the reason NATO doesn't help is because they don't CONDONE the war in Iraq. Not because they don't want america to be the world police. s**t, is that what they teach kids nowadays? Propaganda for the masses. neutral
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 5:19 pm
Ophiuchus Red_knightm Ophiuchus Red_knightm Ophiuchus Red_knightm How is the U.S. cannon fodder? I mean compared to the UK we are, but still. It's due to a few events in this war on terror. The US' response was to send as much as possible at the problem. The UK's response was to send our veterans over. The US' troops didnt have enough equipment to go around. The UK's troops brought everything they needed. The US' troops commonly got blown up and struggled to fight terrorism. The UK's troops had a lower death record, and saved the US' a** many a time. The US' general stated "If we had one tenth of their training, this war would be over by now." The UK's soldiers even have people who have gained the PURPLE HEART from such a small conflict. As you can see, the US seems to be using fodder in comparison to the UK's tactics. Yeah.... I guess times are a changing, but thats a different topic. Do we need more designs for the UK and the US, and what happened to china and Russia? where are they in this? ....china and russia are a part of the current war on terror? neutral I'm using the current affairs as a basis for a story. Yeah I know, just what the hell are they going to be doing with giant weapons going about, just stay neutral or will they have MS' for theirselfs? I know you are taking current affairs, but still I'd think Mobile Suits would change things abit. but then it wouldn't be based on current affairs, would it? Do you see china and russia running to our aid? ********, do you see the rest of NATO doing so either? They may well be building military use mobile suits due to the terrorist attacks as a defense mechanism, but they wouldn't get involved, just as they aren't getting involved now. ok so they do have the technology to produce them. what else do we need now?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:00 am
Red_knightm Ophiuchus Red_knightm Ophiuchus Red_knightm Yeah.... I guess times are a changing, but thats a different topic. Do we need more designs for the UK and the US, and what happened to china and Russia? where are they in this? ....china and russia are a part of the current war on terror? neutral I'm using the current affairs as a basis for a story. Yeah I know, just what the hell are they going to be doing with giant weapons going about, just stay neutral or will they have MS' for theirselfs? I know you are taking current affairs, but still I'd think Mobile Suits would change things abit. but then it wouldn't be based on current affairs, would it? Do you see china and russia running to our aid? ********, do you see the rest of NATO doing so either? They may well be building military use mobile suits due to the terrorist attacks as a defense mechanism, but they wouldn't get involved, just as they aren't getting involved now. ok so they do have the technology to produce them. what else do we need now? Well, now that we've planned the initial units and background... CHARACTERS. We have three "main" groups. 1 - English forces mobile suit team. 2 - American forces mobile suit team, "Lucky Aces". 3 - The main terrorist leaders.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|