|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 6:58 am
Post what you would like the companies to focus on, or what you would add to the next (saga name here) game.
Let's see...
- Squarenix: Stop releasing games for The One Franchise and go back to the sagas that were really worth playing: Secret of Mana, Chrono Trigger, Chaos Legion... (To name a few.) *Not saying Final Fantasy was always bad. Just the last four or five games.
- Someone. Anyone. Wait, not really anyone, but could one of the GOOD game companies out there make another Sailor Moon RPG? It's kinda hard for my gamer heart to accept there's only one good Sailor Moon game out there.
- Beyond Good And Evil 2. And I want it now.
- A new Street Fighter game that's not a remake/remastering of the same old games (Even SF 3 got old.)
- A 3D (a la Fifa 04-05-06-07) Captain Tsubasa game. Because the old RPGs were fun to play, and the SNES/PS1 versions made the soccer bits more realistic. And frankly, I'd love seeing those wall-piercing shots in full 3D glory.
- Sonic Riders 2. Riders had one flaw, and it was not having enough different tracks to race on. Oh, and different game modes would be nice, too (a racing CTF, for example. Works in Unreal Tournament.)
- Unreal Tournament 3. I know it's coming out soon, but I want it for yesterday. xp
- Dino Crisis 3 for PC. Some of us can't go buying every damn console out there just to follow our favorite sagas. (PS 2 around here are still worth around 200 dollars. Ouch.)
- A good DS emulator. Not one that only works for the programmers' favorite games. (I love big bootlegs and I cannot lie! surprised )
- A good Rurouni Kenshin game (the one that exists, for PS1, was a bad ripoff of Samurai Showdown.)
- A Battletoads 3D game. It's a classic that deserves a good sequel (unlike the two it got.)
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:09 pm
Lets see (Please if you don't like what I say ok)
Squareenix Final fantasy and Dragon Quest are great games but give your other series respect too. The mana series gets games but no one hears about them until they are released and they suck. I also would like a new Chrono game and a new Parasite Eve game. Oh and how about original games? Your last original title was what Kingdom hearts and even that was hardly original.
Capcom: Please continue the Megaman legends series. I know not everyone loves it but it had a great story that well is unfinished. instead you drove the Megaman X story into the ground and kept giving us Battle Network games. WHY? Also instead of millions of re releases of the same game (Street Fighter 2) that are no different release Street Fighter four already. I mean just look at Guilty Gear a new 2-d Fighter can be Sooooo fluid now.
For a 3d Good Sonic Platformer that does not feel like a wiimote demo.
Yeah a good DS Emulator Pokemon D&A is unplayable at 5 frames per second.
An English port of Mother three. Yeah I Emulated it but I still want to own it.
A game company to hire me and make my game "Refuge" to become a reality.
(Note) Razor If you think Squares recent Final fantasys are bad play their recent Mana games much much worse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 3:49 pm
Heh... Agreed on most points.
Parasite Eve... Hell yeah. That game was so underrated because of its "sucky controls!" (same controls as the first two RE games. Blind fanbois can say much s**t without knowing.)
Street Fighter 4 needs to become a reality. And they need to give some of the old characters some story there. I mean... SF 3-3's Guile and Chunli were basically filler material, with no freaking reasons to be there, and why put Makoto in when you already got Sakura and Karin who have half her moves each (and fight soooo better.) IMO Sakura's dragon killer was one of the best anti-n00b SF techniques ever. She needs to return as a 20-some kick-a** Shotokan (Making the next generation be really a next generation. Can't live with just Elena, Ibuki, Dudley and Alex, really.)
Sonic's 3D platformers had one big flaw: Too easy. Heroes almost does it, but I was done with the whole thing (all four teams + final battle) before I realized (and Team Chaotix IMO needs to be shot into a black hole.) I never had any trouble with the controls (I don't care if it's 2D, 3D or 4D, controls are never a problem to me in any game. I adapt to them and master them.)
As for Square's Mana series, they lost me with Legend Of Mana (PS1) the thing was so 3-years-old-can-beat-this I really didn't care (and the GBA Mana was a remake of the real Seiken Densetsu 1, so it wasn't a new game for me.) But why does the SoM saga suck nowadays? Because they put those who aren't 'good' enough to work in FF, to work in the other projects (and if they were lamer than those who released FF12, then crap, are they BAD.)
More wishes:
- A Dragon Ball Z game that needs you to use the brain, to have some sort of strategy going. Fighting games are cool for 45 minutes, but the old NES Dragon Ball Z RPGs beat the stuffing out of Budokai/Hyper Dimensions/Ultimate Battle 22 and specially, the no-challenge GBA DBZ games.
- A Transformers game that's not a milk cow. Yeah, the movie wasn't bad, but the game spawned off it makes my spark bleed. xp
- Carmageddon 4. Let's show those GTA-high kiddies what a good car rampage is about. (I see your GTA tank and raise you a caterpillar. Who needs tank shells when you can crush anything under your wheels and not even feel the bump?)
- Stop releasing Tetris wannabes. Seriously. There was one, and only one, and all yor Pentis/Hexis/Wateris/Bombis/OMGWTFPILLSis games can only hope to lick Tetris' boots clean (if they ask nicely enough.) This goes specially for Popc(r)ap Games, the major offenders in that matter.
- Killer Instinct 3. That game was "what Mortal Kombat wants to be when it grows up" but was left without more sequels for no good reason.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 7:11 pm
Who owns the rights to killer instinct though? Nintendo or Rare. That can cause a problem when it comes to making a new one and where it goes.
Oh and razor Square Soft is not Chaos Legion. Capcom is.
Also have you played Seiken Densetsu 4/Dawn of Mana for the PS2. Proves that if their recent Final fantasy's suck continuing the Mana series was even worse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 11:44 pm
i say there needs to be some honestly good starship games out there for consoles like ps2, ps3, xbox360 and ....wait...yeah, those are the only good consoles in my opinion.. sweatdrop (and i can't handle an xbox controler for s**t.) xp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 6:52 pm
Go over to the PC universe.
There you got all the StarWars games, the Star Trek games (which IMO suck, but some like'em,) and there's even strategy-spaceship games like Homeworld...
And, of course, there's Tyrian 2000. Best. ********. Space. Shooter. Ever.
(And It's 2-D. But 2-D genius > 3-D half-assedness.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 12:15 am
RazorZKnight Go over to the PC universe. There you got all the StarWars games, the Star Trek games (which IMO suck, but some like'em,) and there's even strategy-spaceship games like Homeworld... And, of course, there's Tyrian 2000. Best. ********. Space. Shooter. Ever. (And It's 2-D. But 2-D genius > 3-D half-assedness.) true, true, but i don't got a computer that can handle those games... sweatdrop i liked homeworld from the strategy guide i read. i wanted to play it SOOO badly! >.<
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 2:19 am
...
Tyrian 2000 works in a Pentium 1. I've tested it. It really doesn't need much in the way of graphics.
And if that fails, the original game, Tyrian, I played it in my computer a decade ago. It's pre-Diablo 1, I don't think any computer that still works would have problems running it (tho, XP is a b***h when faced with DOS games. There's ways to solve that too.)
As for Homeworld/HW 2? They run awesome in my Pentium 4 2.5 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 256 MB vidcard and dual 250 GB disks >.> Yeah, I don't waste money in consoles, that's why I can keep my computer up to date (tho I need to get me a dualcore 3.6 GHz CPU and a 512 MB vidcard for the next batch of PC games.
And, you know, the downright best 3D space shooter ever created was Tie Fighter, which worked in computers so old you probably never thought they could exist... (Still, screw graphics with a rusty corkscrew, Tie Fighter still beats the crap out of any other 3D SW shooter ever made.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:07 am
RazorZKnight ... Tyrian 2000 works in a Pentium 1. I've tested it. It really doesn't need much in the way of graphics. And if that fails, the original game, Tyrian, I played it in my computer a decade ago. It's pre-Diablo 1, I don't think any computer that still works would have problems running it (tho, XP is a b***h when faced with DOS games. There's ways to solve that too.) As for Homeworld/HW 2? They run awesome in my Pentium 4 2.5 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 256 MB vidcard and dual 250 GB disks >.> Yeah, I don't waste money in consoles, that's why I can keep my computer up to date (tho I need to get me a dualcore 3.6 GHz CPU and a 512 MB vidcard for the next batch of PC games. And, you know, the downright best 3D space shooter ever created was Tie Fighter, which worked in computers so old you probably never thought they could exist... (Still, screw graphics with a rusty corkscrew, Tie Fighter still beats the crap out of any other 3D SW shooter ever made.) @~@ ,,, xp *faints.* ... tooo ... maaaany... computer woooooords!!!... crying *dies.* i swear, how is it i can have half a dozen computer modding friends and still not understand a single word you freaks say!!? gonk i'm so computer illiterate!! crying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 4:59 pm
Only those who want to learn do learn. That applies for everything, but in computers, it's one big truth.
If you don't even know what your computer is, then you can't really tell which games will work for it, and what you need to improve to get to play those games you want.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 8:46 pm
RazorZKnight Only those who want to learn do learn. That applies for everything, but in computers, it's one big truth. If you don't even know what your computer is, then you can't really tell which games will work for it, and what you need to improve to get to play those games you want. i'm always too busy trying to learn more important things than thinsg about something i'm not gonna get to even use half the time anyway.... xp i spend more time getting into astral wars and getting mixed up in the affairs of the gods to have time to play video games anyway... sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 2:14 am
Then don't complain that you don't know, accept it as a fact of life...
And well, you do need computers for other stuff than gaming, and knowing what computer you have helps you know why the f'k the internet's slow/IM services won't work/your virtual dog ate your virtual homework.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 9:02 pm
RazorZKnight Then don't complain that you don't know, accept it as a fact of life... And well, you do need computers for other stuff than gaming, and knowing what computer you have helps you know why the f'k the internet's slow/IM services won't work/your virtual dog ate your virtual homework. yeah, whiny habbits i am still trying to break... sweatdrop i realy am sorry. xp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 3:45 pm
I dont like Nintendo Dual is a creepy graphic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
