|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 4:10 am
For those of you who do not know: Prop 8 out here in California was the banning of Same-Sex marriage.
Many people are sending me tl;dr's about how I am a homophobic, card carrying KKK member, who doesn't want them to have the same rights I do. Since, you know, all Republicans MUST be for YES on Prop 8. Even though, statistically speaking, we NEEDED about 20%+ of that YES vote to go to the democratic majority of the state to have it pass. Which it did. That's all on them, but, of course, Democrats never take the blame. For anything political. neutral Yes, well, besides the fact that I cannot even vote, I decided to play devil's advocate with them. This is what I mentioned to an acquaintance of mine when he demanded that "all those ******** who voted yes" needed to "gtfo his myspace friends list". As if he couldn't be assed to do it himself. Dumbass. But I digress.
wahmbulance TL;DR IS AHEAD wahmbulance
"Not to play devil's advocate here, but has anyone taken into consideration the fact that marriage is a religious ceremony? I think what most people were afraid of was being FORCED to marry gay couples as it is against their religions. I mean, if it didn't pass ((actually, I believe they are appealing it, right?)) then these churches would have lost their tax exempt status because they would not marry them. It would be considered discrimination, and, if the couple wanted to, they could sue the church and ruin them. Just putting that point out there. I also think that the NO campaign was TERRIBLE to many people which put them off. They shouldn't be screaming in these peoples faces about how "ignorant" they are when it is in their target audience's religion ((or, at least, they perceive it to be)) that gays shouldn't be married. It turns them off to the cause, you know? That campaign was just as close minded as they claim the "yes vote" to be by resorting to name-calling and telling them they should feel "ashamed". Instead, they should try to educate them peacefully on their view point and ask that they take the feelings of these couples into consideration. The NO campaign should have been saying, "Just think, what if you couldn't marry the one you loved?" instead of "IT IS WRONG, WRONG, WRONG". The skin color issue does not even come close to this. This is something I have been lampooned for already, but, seriously, it doesn't even come close. It's the MAN+MAN/WOMAN+WOMAN issue here because, as previously stated, they feel it is against their religion when it comes to SAME-SEX marriage, not a bi-racial marriage. You know, many people were attacked ((just as gay and bi people have been)) because they had YES signs in their yard. My neighbor's house was egged and someone tried to beat their door in. I think the NO campaign just went about this the wrong way COMPLETELY. Guilt tripping people into voting their way is NOT going to work. On a side note: I was SHOCKED ((because of the same guilt trip reason)) that 4 turned out the way they did. I found those commercials to be rude and arrogant. "Think outside your bubble" indeed. Why don't you think outside YOURS and try to see EVERYONE'S point of view? but I digress lol"
((lol was added at the end to make that hard core liberal think that I was completely on his side. neutral ))
I also did not add this: The Gay Marriage Law was passed illegally by those three judges. They thought they could decide what the people wanted for them. They wanted to change the state constitution with only taking a MINORITY of people into consideration. Also, I still think that field trip to the lesbian wedding was creepy. ((Just in case you didn't hear: An elementary school in San Francisco took it's first graders to see a lesbian wedding)) Am I the only one that thinks education about this should not start that young? I am not trying to be closed minded, but these children are too young too understand imo. Couldn't they have waited until, oh say, 6th grade?
ALSO I know it is hard to tell from my posting, but I am still undecided on this issue. I'm not 100% for it or against right now. Mainly because my best guy friend is bisexual. He is on the fence with me ((he is very Catholic)).
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 5:07 am
I'm not for any government sanctioned marriage It's a religious institution Always has been and should have stayed that way That and marriage was never a guaranteed right Stands to reason That gay marriage ( since it's not generally accepted in most religions) wouldn't be allowed(whatever you wanna call it)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 11:54 am
i find myself confused by the very issue of marriage as opposed to civil union. i personally believe marriage to be a religious institution that shouldnt be interfered with by the government, but it is because of the tax implications and other things like health care and insurance. i am assuming that the marriage ceremony itself is now considered a civil union. how could it not be? married people receive the same benefits as couples joined by civil union. its a matter of those people choosing how they want to be united. although i am myself an atheist, i believe we must respect each religion and their right to perform whatever ceremony within their own bounds that they wish as long as it does not violate the laws of the country or state they reside in. that being said, i dont think gay marriage should be politicized. i also dont think any marriage should be politicized. if a couple wants to get married, let them, regardless of gender as long as they are both human. however, if two people want to receive the government benefits that come with the joining of two people, they need to perform a civil union in either a court of law or some other federal building set aside for that kind of purpose.
dont make it retro-active. allow couples that are already married to receive the benefits of a civil union. keep the separation of church and state without damaging the integrity of either.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 7:24 pm
Marriage isn't a Christian term anymore. Almost every religion uses it, and not all of them are against homosexuality. Even some Christian demoninations do gay marriage, so technically, even if it was a Christian term, you could argue God would want you to do it.
Civil unions...if that is what makes people happy, then call it that. Marriage is still marriage to me. Gay Civil Unions = marriage.
A ban on civil unions, even straight ones, was passed her in Florida. I'm sad.
I need to find a new religion that isn't Christianity. Too many Christians are looking at me weird.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 9:21 pm
I'm with Scythe on this. Keep government out of religion.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 3:36 am
TBH this is one of the things that makes me more moderate. (I know, I know.)
Religiously, government needs to keep out of the church. But as for legal marriage licenses, there is no need to ban except to make more people angry.
And if you don't want to call it a marriage then call it something else but I do believe they need to have equal legal rights to straight couples.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 7:46 am
The Zodikosis TBH this is one of the things that makes me more moderate. (I know, I know.) Religiously, government needs to keep out of the church. But as for legal marriage licenses, there is no need to ban except to make more people angry. And if you don't want to call it a marriage then call it something else but I do believe they need to have equal legal rights to straight couples. Government should stay out of religion Religion should stay out of government Scrap all marriage laws and things like tax penalties / breaks and make everything a civil union marriages are as a religious thing/ ceremony
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 6:30 pm
Scythe of Relief The Zodikosis TBH this is one of the things that makes me more moderate. (I know, I know.) Religiously, government needs to keep out of the church. But as for legal marriage licenses, there is no need to ban except to make more people angry. And if you don't want to call it a marriage then call it something else but I do believe they need to have equal legal rights to straight couples. Government should stay out of religion Religion should stay out of government Scrap all marriage laws and things like tax penalties / breaks and make everything a civil union marriages are as a religious thing/ ceremony Honestly, if scrapping the idea of legal marriage licenses is what it takes to ensure equal rights, then by all means I believe it should be done.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 2:52 am
The Zodikosis Scythe of Relief The Zodikosis TBH this is one of the things that makes me more moderate. (I know, I know.) Religiously, government needs to keep out of the church. But as for legal marriage licenses, there is no need to ban except to make more people angry. And if you don't want to call it a marriage then call it something else but I do believe they need to have equal legal rights to straight couples. Government should stay out of religion Religion should stay out of government Scrap all marriage laws and things like tax penalties / breaks and make everything a civil union marriages are as a religious thing/ ceremony Honestly, if scrapping the idea of legal marriage licenses is what it takes to ensure equal rights, then by all means I believe it should be done.If nobody can agree that everyone is equal (not just gays but so called "african americans and the like) Then there will be no equality to be had If equality can be gained by taking a power that the government should never have had in the first place away I'm all for it
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 1:37 am
Even though I am gay I am not 100% sure on ethier side. But I made a list of things I thought would help promote thier 'rights' I say thiers because I hate being at all associated with them. So I made this into a note on facebook.I got a couple responses. "1.Get rid of the gay pride parade.
2.Get rid of the gay community.
3.Have gays/gay supporters be more tolerant.
4.Gays start acting as equals and not different.
5.Take all the stereotypical gays off the main media.
6. No more being proud of your gayness.
7. No more f** hags.
8.Get rid of all gay symbols.
9.Don't go around saying your gay all the time.
10.Stop saying being gay is who you are,not just a part of who you.
A short list.
But showing people that being gay isn't what defines you and your like anyone else who deserves rights,can help a lot more than protests."Friend #1-"I don't understand your rationale for these Angela. These suggestions seem oppressive at best. Everyone has an equal right to express themselves and they ought to exercise it. "Get rid of the gay community"? What type of support system will they have if they are not in a community with like minded people? We must support equal rights for all. To stand idly by in a time of injustice is to aid the oppressor." Friend #2-Just think of what would happen if you applied these restrictions to previous movements in the past. Where would people of color be if they had "gotten rid" of the black community? What would have happened if these people had just decided, "Let's stop being proud of who we are." Change takes more than just allowing the system to work itself out, because they system will never correct itself if there's not one to correct it. And in such a trying time like this, how can one even suggest to take away what matter most, to take away community, a place where people can come together and fight out against the injustices happening right in front of us. You say gays should have more tolerance. Tolerance for what? For allowing people to take away their rights, to treat them as second class humans? Yes, people deserve to have their opinions but those opinions shouldn't be allowed to infringe on other peoples rights, plain and simple. Why in God's name should we tolerate oppression? I do not believe that gay marraige is a right,I think of it as a benefit. Many gay people and they supporters are some of the most closed minded people I know. http://www.gaypatriot.net/This is a website where gay republicans speak about what they think on issues on stuff like this. They have some great stuff and wonderful arguements. They are against teh prop 8 protests. They believe that the people voted,and what they voted for should stay,and should not be changed just because of some people get angry.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 6:20 pm
Even though I am a Christian, I am all for gay rights. My best friend is a gay guy and I'm bisexual. For all the people out there that think that gay marriage should be banned because of their religion should take a look at the Constitution. FREEDOM OF RELIGION. Meaning, the next guy doesn't have to believe as I do. So, they should have all of their rights.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 5:53 am
As much as I'm for gay marriage, I feel that the country as a whole isn't ready for it yet.
People are making it a huge deal.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 5:55 am
Queen of the Highway Even though I am a Christian, I am all for gay rights. My best friend is a gay guy and I'm bisexual. For all the people out there that think that gay marriage should be banned because of their religion should take a look at the Constitution. FREEDOM OF RELIGION. Meaning, the next guy doesn't have to believe as I do. So, they should have all of their rights. I love the stereotype that all republicans and all religious people despise the idea of gay marriage.
I swing more conservatively and I'm catholic... but I'm also bisexual.
All of my democratic friends get confused when they find this out. I'm just a person :<
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 2:43 pm
Rena626 Queen of the Highway Even though I am a Christian, I am all for gay rights. My best friend is a gay guy and I'm bisexual. For all the people out there that think that gay marriage should be banned because of their religion should take a look at the Constitution. FREEDOM OF RELIGION. Meaning, the next guy doesn't have to believe as I do. So, they should have all of their rights. I love the stereotype that all republicans and all religious people despise the idea of gay marriage.
I swing more conservatively and I'm catholic... but I'm also bisexual.
All of my democratic friends get confused when they find this out. I'm just a person :< I know, and I'm bi too. Like, you can't help who you're attracted to, no matter what God you follow.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 4:51 pm
I'm anti-gay marriage anyway, but the reason I support Prop 8 is because in May 2008, four supreme court activist judges overturned the vote of the people and made gay marriage legal despite the vote from four years ago. Overturning the vote of the people. That's pretty unconstitutional. I don't think any court has the right to go against the people for their own agenda. It's just plain wrong. Also, I don't think one interest group should have the power to change society's rules, force people to compromise their beliefs and attack the religious community when they lose. That's not tolerance at all!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|