
Right?
And I've gotten messages saying that it's over bandwidth. 2, in fact. And I've paid the fine. Well I get another one today, when in fact I haven't changed it in months. And I pay the fine. Well just now I get a PM saying this:
Quote:
Earlier in the day your signature was disabled for being over bandwidth. You have failed to change it and you were quoted stating you would not be changing it. Your signature cannot stay over bandwidth, it will continue to be disabled and the fines do continue to raise. I would definitely recommend changing your signature to be within guidelines. I am giving you this chance to change it without it being disabled. I will be checking back tomorrow evening. If it is not changed by then it will be disabled again.
Is it only fair that if I have paid the fine that it should remain? I understand that the restriction on bandwidth is important and it is a traffic issue but people don't have to keep paying for username or gender changes over and over again. (what I mean by this is they don't have to keep paying for one change)
Is this quite fair? I think they should have just told me beforehand that I should have changed it rather that have me pay to keep it then just tell me to change it after I've paid them.
