|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Masked Swordsman Captain
|
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 6:30 pm
Would you be interested in taking over the world? Why or why not? question
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:18 pm
Well, what sort of government would there be, what is the hiearchy?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Masked Swordsman Captain
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 3:56 pm
Starxle Well, what sort of government would there be, what is the hiearchy? Well, what I suggest is (And please offer me feedback on this as it isn't set in stone yet, the constitutions weren't made in a day) A form of global government hybrid where there are:5 leaders (each with a different job) 25 counsel members 195 representatives (One for each country, maybe more or less depending..) How you get into an office:Leaders- Three are voted into office by the Councilors. Two are chosen by the last five leaders. Councilors- Voted into office by the representatives. Representatives - voted into office by their country (The country shall choose the means) What am I talking about when I say that the leaders will have different jobs-There will be the: Head Leader Head Treasurer Head Adviser Head of Economy Head of Defense What each tier of my proposed government does:Leaders- Are the ones in charge of finding solutions to world problems and propose the things to change in the world. Councilors- There are five to a leader, councilors discuss the solutions and proposals that the Leaders decide upon. If the councilors disagree on a leader's proposal, the leader can take it to the representatives, to vote on, after a certain amount of time has passed. Representatives - Representatives put forth the proposed ideas that the Leaders and the Councilors agreed upon into action. They will for the most part be located in the country that they are representing in an embassy-like building. Occasionally, when a leader's council members disagree upon the leader's decisions, the leader can then take it straight to the representatives after a certain amount of time has passed. AfterwordThe problem is, I don't want it to mess with the national governments too much, but I still want us to be able to have enough influence in their governments to get things done/changed. Also, it's not going to be your classic world take-over scheme, in case you didn't realize that from the form of government. I suppose you could say I am going for a more influential(and widespread) version of the U.N. though with a unique style all it's own. Also, we won't be making laws, per say. Instead, we'll be influencing all the different nations to change for the better. With the primary focus being world preservation. Any suggestions, ideas, critique, problems that might arise that you notice?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:13 pm
The Masked Swordsman Starxle Well, what sort of government would there be, what is the hiearchy? Well, what I suggest is (And please offer me feedback on this as it isn't set in stone yet, the constitutions weren't made in a day) A form of global government hybrid where there are:5 leaders (each with a different job) 25 counsel members 195 representatives (One for each country, maybe more or less depending..) How you get into an office:Leaders- Three are voted into office by the Councilors. Two are chosen by the last five leaders. Councilors- Voted into office by the representatives. Representatives - voted into office by their country (The country shall choose the means) What am I talking about when I say that the leaders will have different jobs-There will be the: Head Leader Head Treasurer Head Adviser Head of Economy Head of Defense What each tier of my proposed government does:Leaders- Are the ones in charge of finding solutions to world problems and propose the things to change in the world. Councilors- There are five to a leader, councilors discuss the solutions and proposals that the Leaders decide upon. If the councilors disagree on a leader's proposal, the leader can take it to the representatives, to vote on, after a certain amount of time has passed. Representatives - Representatives put forth the proposed ideas that the Leaders and the Councilors agreed upon into action. They will for the most part be located in the country that they are representing in an embassy-like building. Occasionally, when a leader's council members disagree upon the leader's decisions, the leader can then take it straight to the representatives after a certain amount of time has passed. AfterwordThe problem is, I don't want it to mess with the national governments too much, but I still want us to be able to have enough influence in their governments to get things done/changed. Also, it's not going to be your classic world take-over scheme, in case you didn't realize that from the form of government. I suppose you could say I am going for a more influential(and widespread) version of the U.N. though with a unique style all it's own. Also, we won't be making laws, per say. Instead, we'll be influencing all the different nations to change for the better. With the primary focus being world preservation. Any suggestions, ideas, critique, problems that might arise that you notice? Reminds me of the UN on the last part, also that does not do as much as it apears. I agree that in a organization to take ver the world, a hydra head is a pleaseant idea, however, a hydra rarely is able to work.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:16 pm
I agree with it...As for taking the world...I'm in for sure, use me any way you can. If there are those against us and are refusing to budge no matter what...send the Shadow in.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:39 pm
BlackroseDarkness I agree with it...As for taking the world...I'm in for sure, use me any way you can. If there are those against us and are refusing to budge no matter what...send the Shadow in. You understand that I am trying to limit the bloodshed. This guild is about taking over the world, but so that the world doesn't destroy itself.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
The Masked Swordsman Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:43 pm
The Masked Swordsman BlackroseDarkness I agree with it...As for taking the world...I'm in for sure, use me any way you can. If there are those against us and are refusing to budge no matter what...send the Shadow in. You understand that I am trying to limit the bloodshed. This guild is about taking over the world, but so that the world doesn't destroy itself. i never said anything about bloodshed...i guess i can make it seem as such, with the way i speak. I just...convince them, otherwise...make them willlingly under you.. not through violence...just by knowing their minds, or what they want...maybe trickery if things really dont work. I may have my...ideals wrong right now... Shadow is a strange thing.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:50 pm
Starxle The Masked Swordsman Starxle Well, what sort of government would there be, what is the hiearchy? Well, what I suggest is (And please offer me feedback on this as it isn't set in stone yet, the constitutions weren't made in a day) A form of global government hybrid where there are:5 leaders (each with a different job) 25 counsel members 195 representatives (One for each country, maybe more or less depending..) How you get into an office:Leaders- Three are voted into office by the Councilors. Two are chosen by the last five leaders. Councilors- Voted into office by the representatives. Representatives - voted into office by their country (The country shall choose the means) What am I talking about when I say that the leaders will have different jobs-There will be the: Head Leader Head Treasurer Head Adviser Head of Economy Head of Defense What each tier of my proposed government does:Leaders- Are the ones in charge of finding solutions to world problems and propose the things to change in the world. Councilors- There are five to a leader, councilors discuss the solutions and proposals that the Leaders decide upon. If the councilors disagree on a leader's proposal, the leader can take it to the representatives, to vote on, after a certain amount of time has passed. Representatives - Representatives put forth the proposed ideas that the Leaders and the Councilors agreed upon into action. They will for the most part be located in the country that they are representing in an embassy-like building. Occasionally, when a leader's council members disagree upon the leader's decisions, the leader can then take it straight to the representatives after a certain amount of time has passed. AfterwordThe problem is, I don't want it to mess with the national governments too much, but I still want us to be able to have enough influence in their governments to get things done/changed. Also, it's not going to be your classic world take-over scheme, in case you didn't realize that from the form of government. I suppose you could say I am going for a more influential(and widespread) version of the U.N. though with a unique style all it's own. Also, we won't be making laws, per say. Instead, we'll be influencing all the different nations to change for the better. With the primary focus being world preservation. Any suggestions, ideas, critique, problems that might arise that you notice? Reminds me of the UN on the last part, also that does not do as much as it apears. I agree that in a organization to take ver the world, a hydra head is a pleaseant idea, however, a hydra rarely is able to work. What would you suggest as an alternative then?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
The Masked Swordsman Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 4:44 pm
The Masked Swordsman What would you suggest as an alternative then? You should at least have one lead head of the government elected by at least 4 of the others. That way it is more evident to see the corruption, or to have someone deal with it easier.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 5:14 pm
Starxle The Masked Swordsman What would you suggest as an alternative then? You should at least have one lead head of the government elected by at least 4 of the others. That way it is more evident to see the corruption, or to have someone deal with it easier. Hmm, then more like having the Leader be, well the leader. Then the four will have less power then the leader, but with the power to decree that the leader is corrupt and unfit for duty if they have a majority of the four sub-heads deciding that the leader is unfit. (among their other duties)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
The Masked Swordsman Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 4:10 am
All you need to take over the world (or world peace) is money. With money you can buy weapons land soldiers anything you need. Get enough money and start a small organization or gang as their now referd to. Make it succesful well enough for it to become worldwide. Then take other small organizations that have a simularity in your own and buy them out. Thus making your own bigger. As you get bigger and bigger most large countrys may start expecting you as a terrorist org. But just keep going untill you are large enough to buy out things like the Triads or the Mafia. These will act as you soldiers aloung with whoever you need. Start using the money and power you have to buy and get larger amounts of land. Once you have a good base of operations you start. Sooner or later small countries will be going to war. When they do offer your survises to the highest offer. Then destroy the aposing country and get paid. As you do this you will gain more money and more power thus more countries will come to you seeking help. eventually you will be large enough to call your org a small countrie. This is as far as im going into this... So figure the rest out on you own.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2010 10:40 am
In reality it's not so simple as that. Even if you have more money or power, you could still be overthrown. Just as the Americans were able to fight back the British. Take, for instance one of your own examples, the mafia. Or to be more precise, the Sicilian Mafia. Despite having a mass of wealth, and power. They are breaking apart. Their bosses have been locked up, and have little to no contact with the outside world, so their organization is slowly breaking apart. Perhaps if we only looked to control a small part of the world, we could rely solely on money and finance. However, with such a global goal we have to work together with the powers that be, otherwise we will get nowhere.
You have to use politics, the population, money, resources, and most of all you must know how to use all of them to their fullest potential. I mean, if other countries suspect you of being a terrorist group, then they are going to be keeping a close eye on you. You can't just keep growing and growing, it will make everyone else nervous. First, you must convince everyone else that it is in their best interest to let your group grow passively.
The world we live in is much to complicated to rely on one form of power. In order to accomplish our goal, we must use *everything* that we can get.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
The Masked Swordsman Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 11:05 pm
I don't think we have a full understanding of everything yet. This is going to take a plan with such meticulous detail, that every move we make is to have a certain effect which leads us to our next move. But we can't make such moves unless we know exactly what it is that we're trying to accomplish and what stands in our way. We have to know exactly how things work, so that we can work them to our own advantage. Thinking of things of a world wide scale, that's even more detail to take into consideration. I propose that we begin doing topics of study, and that we have a thread or forum to post all findings on the subjects that we're researching. A plan may begin to form itself when we know what we're working with.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 11:19 pm
Oh, but in answer to the question posed here, I don't personally want to run the world as much as I want to take an active hand in drastically reshaping it for the good of everyone. Peacefully, and honestly.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|