Welcome to Gaia! ::

Magick and Psionic Research Institute and Learning Center

Back to Guilds

Trying to understand the potential of the human mind, and the potency of the human spirit. 

Tags: Occult, Supernatural, Magic, Psychic 

Reply Otherkin/Reincarnation/Soul Discussion
Is there anyway to become immortal?

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

The MiIIennium EarI

Wealthy Elder

PostPosted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 4:50 pm


I would personally like to know if you can become immortal?
PostPosted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 4:54 pm


I'd doubt it with the physical body. Perhaps with the soul.
But in my personal opinion, the spirit is eternal, the bodies we use are temporary vessels to experience life.


josiv


Loiterer


divineseraph

PostPosted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 8:10 pm


Only the soul, but that is immortal anyway. I would say that a true Philosopher's Stone could do that, but realistically you could only survive as long as the planet or the required materials, which is not, strictly speaking, eternal.
PostPosted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 8:48 pm


The nature of the physical dimension is that nothing is eternal. Science tells us that not even the stars are eternal.

Obscurus

Otherworldly Foe

18,675 Points
  • Millionaire 200
  • Forum Regular 100
  • Big Tipper 100

[BlkCat]

PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 7:17 am


I strongly believe that anything that is created can also be destroyed.

This goes for souls, gods, humans, animals, in-animate objects, ect.


The only thing that is "immortal" to me, is pure energy. So your spirit(the energy) is "immortal", but your soul(the self) is not.



Of course this also depends on your definition of immortal. Immortal means you -cannot- cease to exist. Everlasting, in my definition, means you live forever and your body never degrades, however if somebody pulled the trigger of a shotgun pointed at your head...well...you're dead.
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 7:45 am


MiIIennium EarI, an interesting method of finding more about the issues of mortality would most likely be found via a google search of the term "Anti-Aging". You could also start with this metaphor, or head directly to this site.

I personally am quite fascinated by the subject and those who deal with "Anti-Aging" technologies.

Subrosian
Captain


Delequen

PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 10:21 am


[BlkCat]
I strongly believe that anything that is created can also be destroyed.

This goes for souls, gods, humans, animals, in-animate objects, ect.


The only thing that is "immortal" to me, is pure energy. So your spirit(the energy) is "immortal", but your soul(the self) is not.



Of course this also depends on your definition of immortal. Immortal means you -cannot- cease to exist. Everlasting, in my definition, means you live forever and your body never degrades, however if somebody pulled the trigger of a shotgun pointed at your head...well...you're dead.


I'm sure this post wasn't meant to sound as...ignorant (best word I can use for this) as it does, but I'd just like to clarify something. The soul is synonymous with the spirit. They are just different words used to describe the same thing: The basic animating force of life, the energy and consciousness of a being. It is energy, all of it is. The self, the mind, the conscious and unconscious is all energy, and therefor is all immortal if we are to go by that definition. The definition I gave is a simple re-wording of this definition:
Quote:
In many religions and parts of philosophy, the soul is the immaterial part of a person. It is usually thought to consist of one's thoughts and personality, and can be synonymous with the spirit, mind or self. ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soul


If how you explained it was your personal outlook then please state so people aren't confused when the majority consensus (documented definitions, all major and minor religions) document the soul and spirit as the same thing.
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 6:50 pm


Delequen
The soul is synonymous with the spirit. They are just different words used to describe the same thing: The basic animating force of life, the energy and consciousness of a being.


Thousands of years of alchemical tradition might disagree with the assertion that the spirit and soul are the same thing. The spirit is the ever-present interpenetrating active "God-element" of all of existence. It is what keeps the universe in motion and in the case of living things, it is the animating property.

The soul, on the other hand, is that unique aspect that makes an individual an individual (aside from the obvious physical differences). The soul, however, cannot be equated to the mind. The mind is more analogous with the Spirit, which I described above.

A simpler way of putting it might be like this: Everything has a soul. Animals have souls, plants have souls, and even minerals have souls in the alchemical view. However, spirit is the driving force behind all of this manifestation and life; it is not the specific make-up of the individual in question. We all possess "a spirit" but we also all possess "a soul".

According to the alchemists, of course.

Obscurus

Otherworldly Foe

18,675 Points
  • Millionaire 200
  • Forum Regular 100
  • Big Tipper 100

Delequen

PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 8:43 pm


Then by the definition you've given, according to the alchemists, the soul is a part of the spirit, thus equating it to the same thing. I've studied Alchemy, along with other paths, including Hermetics, so I know what you're trying to say, but it's all a round about way of deterring it to be all inclusive.
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 9:06 pm


Delequen
Then by the definition you've given, according to the alchemists, the soul is a part of the spirit, thus equating it to the same thing. I've studied Alchemy, along with other paths, including Hermetics, so I know what you're trying to say, but it's all a round about way of deterring it to be all inclusive.


It really is a just a question of semantics. In everyday conversation "soul" and "spirit" are interchangeable. I'm just pointing out that the animating force and the individual properties that make something individual are not the same thing.

Obscurus

Otherworldly Foe

18,675 Points
  • Millionaire 200
  • Forum Regular 100
  • Big Tipper 100

Delequen

PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:07 am


Obscurus

It really is a just a question of semantics. In everyday conversation "soul" and "spirit" are interchangeable. I'm just pointing out that the animating force and the individual properties that make something individual are not the same thing.


I understand that, but what I'm trying to say is by doing that, you've defeated your own argument.
PostPosted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 2:08 pm


The animating force and the individual properties - spirit and soul - not the same thing? I'd say that depends on your worldview, but let's not go there. It's sort of tangential, but suffice it to say I think "individuality" is a questionable concept if taken on its own.

In a way this relates to how I see the issue of immortality, though. I find immortality to be a fool's dream from two angles: everything is already immortal and everything is always changing. On the surface I imagine it seems these two are irreconcilable contraries. This is true if you have a more linear, one-dimensional concept of time, but not if you look outside of that paradigm. I'd try to explain it better, but it's difficult to put into words and it's something you either get or you don't get (and if you don't get it, by no means does this mean you're "unenlightened" it just means the idea doesn't gel with your worldview).

Starlock


Obscurus

Otherworldly Foe

18,675 Points
  • Millionaire 200
  • Forum Regular 100
  • Big Tipper 100
PostPosted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:27 pm


All I'm saying is that in the alchemical view there is a body, soul, *and* spirit. And they are distinctly separate things. I, for the most part, adhere to this view. I think that it requires a good deal of study into alchemy to really understand what I mean by separation of soul and spirit though.

As I said, when speaking in casual conversation, spirit and soul are pretty much interchangeable. The distinction is important when we're actually discussing those concepts within an alchemical context.

@Delequen: Saying that the Soul is part of the Spirit is the same as saying that the Body is part of the Spirit or the Body is part of the Soul. The mind and the soul are separate in this view, in case there is any confusion with that.


None of this is terribly pertinent to the topic of immortality though. I'll just say that I believe that the incorporeal aspect of ourselves is immortal for all intents and purposes, as energy cannot be created or destroyed. Even when we vacate the physical body, our "spiritual" body, or however we get around when we're dead, could still be considered the Body in the above trinity. I'm not going to comment on concepts like immortality or where we go after we die, as I don't really know what I believe when it comes to these subjects. I just believe that physical death is not the end.
PostPosted: Sat Apr 24, 2010 2:32 pm


Actually this is something science has come up with, you see sea turtles after maturity stop growing and stop deteriorating. Now we have that same gene with in us. Now this is just speculation but many scientists believe that at a age well past 100 humans perverbial switch will flip and we too will stop aging much like the turtles. So apart from out side sorcess and ill health potentialy yes. But you would have to live a long time to get there and you may just change your mind before then.

CoonHillda

Reply
Otherkin/Reincarnation/Soul Discussion

 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum