|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potions Master Snape Crew
|
 Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 2:35 am
The last time a Snape won in the arena, it was a lousy cosplay with the cheap Goth items and the Celebrity Date for Lily.
Will we let such a shameful thing happen again?
http://www.gaiaonline.com/arena/gaia/cosplay-avatar/vote/?entry_id=101899169#title
Vote for me. And I do ask that you vote fairly.
It's also part of a cosplay group effort. Any votes towards cosplay avatars with the "pctmember" tag are greatly appreciated. The fandoms vary. Again, vote fairly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:14 am
I thought it was good, I hope you win
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potions Master Snape Crew
|
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 1:00 pm
I appreciate your vote. *wants to place. Did hit 13th back in 2007*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 3:25 pm
...I don't like it as much as movie Snape. Ah well, I voted for you anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potions Master Snape Crew
|
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 4:09 pm
*Book!Snape ftw. Likes him better that way, personally*
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 4:14 pm
...movie Snape is nicer. And hotter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potions Master Snape Crew
|
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:19 pm
Psh, ugly devious b*****d > not-so-devious-b*****d pretty boy. talk2hand
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 8:00 pm
Potions Master Snape Psh, ugly devious b*****d > not-so-devious-b*****d pretty boy. talk2hand I see it the other way around. Ah well, whatever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 10:57 am
As far as Book!Snape versus Rickman!Snape goes, I have to say that Rickman is the only actor that could pull off the role of Snape and pull it off well. Though they could do with making Rickman's skin a little sallower, I find the two are quite similar. Plus since the book is sort of in Harry's POV, the description given was rather biased, I think. Either way, wonderful cosplay, Professor.
I can't believe that a cosplay with just shoddy Goth items won. And the Celebrity Date=Lily thing is really just stupid. If they'd made the avi with the right theme in mind, instead of just throwing things together, it may have looked quite good. It's rather sad, really..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 10:59 am
Evelyn Luminariel ...movie Snape is nicer. And hotter. I'm going to have to agree with you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 1:41 pm
I love both, I have only one problem with film Snape, he's too good looking, in the book he is ment to be ugly, but Alan is far from it and can sing and dance, he's too damn hot for his own good, but I still love him, I how can you not like Snape? And they are both the same character
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 7:40 pm
Schizo_S A K U As far as Book!Snape versus Rickman!Snape goes, I have to say that Rickman is the only actor that could pull off the role of Snape and pull it off well. Though they could do with making Rickman's skin a little sallower, I find the two are quite similar. Plus since the book is sort of in Harry's POV, the description given was rather biased, I think. Either way, wonderful cosplay, Professor. I can't believe that a cosplay with just shoddy Goth items won. And the Celebrity Date=Lily thing is really just stupid. If they'd made the avi with the right theme in mind, instead of just throwing things together, it may have looked quite good. It's rather sad, really..
I'll concede that point that the books were written in Harry's POV, but I guess it's a preference thing. Personally, I like him uglier. Hollywood just has a tendency to pretty up things (I have a rant about other characters in various media too, and not just Snape. >> There are some where the source material is unbiased and from a third-person perspective that clearly shows the characters as homely, but they allowed the actor to keep his handsomeness for eye candy instead of breaking out some make-up and making them look truer to their source).
I couldn't believe it either. I could find the cosplay if you want; it came out the same month as the last book.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potions Master Snape Crew
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 7:53 pm
hazel843 I love both, I have only one problem with film Snape, he's too good looking, in the book he is ment to be ugly, but Alan is far from it and can sing and dance, he's too damn hot for his own good, but I still love him, I how can you not like Snape? And they are both the same character ...I so don't see that as a problem. wink
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 11:23 pm
Potions Master Snape Schizo_S A K U As far as Book!Snape versus Rickman!Snape goes, I have to say that Rickman is the only actor that could pull off the role of Snape and pull it off well. Though they could do with making Rickman's skin a little sallower, I find the two are quite similar. Plus since the book is sort of in Harry's POV, the description given was rather biased, I think. Either way, wonderful cosplay, Professor. I can't believe that a cosplay with just shoddy Goth items won. And the Celebrity Date=Lily thing is really just stupid. If they'd made the avi with the right theme in mind, instead of just throwing things together, it may have looked quite good. It's rather sad, really..
I'll concede that point that the books were written in Harry's POV, but I guess it's a preference thing. Personally, I like him uglier. Hollywood just has a tendency to pretty up things (I have a rant about other characters in various media too, and not just Snape. >> There are some where the source material is unbiased and from a third-person perspective that clearly shows the characters as homely, but they allowed the actor to keep his handsomeness for eye candy instead of breaking out some make-up and making them look truer to their source).
I couldn't believe it either. I could find the cosplay if you want; it came out the same month as the last book.And that's terrible. That they cut out his finer moments, that is. I think that since Hollywood can't stand unattractive people, it effects films greatly. I mean, the 2004(I think..) Phantom of the Opera movie had Gerard Butler as a total hottie. I could totally live with the partial disfigurement and the rather tattered hair, which is basically all that was used to portray his disfigurement and when originally the Phantom was supposed to look way worse ("Like yellow parchment is his skin . . . a great black hole served as the nose that never grew . . ." as said by Joseph Buquet, rather aptly describing the Phantom, if we're going by the book) I think the eye candy thing is to enhance the way the movie looks, because as a general rule, humans are shallow in that way. Most people aren't going to see a romantic movie like The Phantom of the Opera if, for example, Miss Daae was rather lacking in the department of looks, and the Phantom was disfigured as he should be and not as Hollywood believed correct. And as for Snape being 'uglier' as you put it, I think that he's probably not ugly, so much as not what society deems handsome. (cough Lockhart cough) I'd quite like to hear this rant of yours, and I'd like the link to the cosplay as well. =]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 11:32 pm
This is kind of off topic, but it has Snape, so.... That makes it okay, right? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
