|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 5:38 pm
Ok what weapons would you say would be the worst to use against zombies?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 7:14 pm
This topic is too ******** broad.
Air. Feathers. Food. Bandages. Water. Dust. Sand. Paper.
There's no discussion because there are too many things that are utterly harmless. (Within reason.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 7:30 pm
I meant in the sense that a chainsaw is a bad weapon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 7:52 pm
Shrantic This topic is too ******** broad. Air. Feathers. Food. Bandages. Water. Dust. Sand. Paper. There's no discussion because there are too many things that are utterly harmless. (Within reason.) ******** you, sand is an awesome weapon. Blind zombies have a significantly harder time finding you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:10 pm
I agree with Shrantic on the most part. I mean, you can use a wooden spoon as a weapon, but it would be a sucky a** weapon. Same goes for a butter knife or a sock with a bunch of nickels in it. Though that last one might not be so bad if you get a good sock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:28 pm
Pretty much everything on Future Weapons.
Because they're either A)Prototypes, B) Shittily designed but they paid a ton to Discovery, or C) You can't get one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 6:14 am
uryu ishida Pretty much everything on Future Weapons. Because they're either A)Prototypes, B) Shittily designed but they paid a ton to Discovery, or C) You can't get one. Like the Cat Gun. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:26 am
Fresnel uryu ishida Pretty much everything on Future Weapons. Because they're either A)Prototypes, B) Shittily designed but they paid a ton to Discovery, or C) You can't get one. Like the Cat Gun. That is a great design. I want need one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 1:29 am
A wheelchair. And you're in it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 7:05 am
Okay, well I say that the Desert Eagle is a bad weapon.
Yeah, it'll kill some for you.
But then it jams at the worst possible moment.
And you die.
Fun, eh?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 7:51 am
XxBroken_And_ShatteredxX Okay, well I say that the Desert Eagle is a bad weapon. Yeah, it'll kill some for you. But then it jams at the worst possible moment. And you die. Fun, eh? I will say, the ones it does kill it'll kill REALLY ******** DEAD, but goddamn does it love to jam. I can't remember if it was the first round or the second, but those magazines just LOVE to make the gun take a giant s**t.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:00 pm
XxBroken_And_ShatteredxX Okay, well I say that the Desert Eagle is a bad weapon. Yeah, it'll kill some for you. But then it jams at the worst possible moment. And you die. Fun, eh? I think this is actually true for most guns. Especially in a situation where the odds of anyone you know that actually knows how to care for a firearm is dead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:13 pm
Doctor Yueh XxBroken_And_ShatteredxX Okay, well I say that the Desert Eagle is a bad weapon. Yeah, it'll kill some for you. But then it jams at the worst possible moment. And you die. Fun, eh? I think this is actually true for most guns. Especially in a situation where the odds of anyone you know that actually knows how to care for a firearm is dead. Eh, NO. BIG no. There are 100 million firearm owners in the US, roughly, and I'd be willing ot bet a great big majority of them know how to clean a gun. As well, most modern, and even a lot of older designs, firearms are reliable even without care for extended periods of time. The DEagle is just a piece of s**t. there are guns that have gone GENERATIONS of being shot, but never being cleaned, as family heirlooms and competition gunners put a ******** of rounds through their guns between cleanings,.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:40 am
uryu ishida Doctor Yueh XxBroken_And_ShatteredxX Okay, well I say that the Desert Eagle is a bad weapon. Yeah, it'll kill some for you. But then it jams at the worst possible moment. And you die. Fun, eh? I think this is actually true for most guns. Especially in a situation where the odds of anyone you know that actually knows how to care for a firearm is dead. Eh, NO. BIG no. There are 100 million firearm owners in the US, roughly, and I'd be willing ot bet a great big majority of them know how to clean a gun. As well, most modern, and even a lot of older designs, firearms are reliable even without care for extended periods of time. The DEagle is just a piece of s**t. there are guns that have gone GENERATIONS of being shot, but never being cleaned, as family heirlooms and competition gunners put a ******** of rounds through their guns between cleanings,. I've never actually thought to myself "man, I really need to clean this gun." Not even when I crack it open and see what's inside. The best I get is. "This needs more lube." And this is from a guy who used to do monthly cleanings, putting 1000 rounds a month through his rifle. At a certain point in the AR's cycle of getting dirty, it self-regulates. There is actually an upper limit as to how dirty an AR can get.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 9:07 am
One of those foam noodles for pool parties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
