|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 7:23 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 9:06 am
There really should be a child-free village open to lower ages, say 21+, for example.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:05 am
No rabbits? *scratches head* confused Well, seeing as it says no ducks (and a pond is shown in the picture) or bees or pigeons either, maybe they think rabbits will escape and eat people's gardens? I'm assuming the 45 age minimum is also likely to make sure they won't get anybody who comes in claiming they won't have kids there who goes back on their word. If at 45 they don't have kids on them, it is probably too late to have them suddenly pop up one that wasn't there before.
I added this to my CF section of my bookmarks. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 1:45 pm
Neato, now we need to make our own childfree village where the entry fee is getting sterilized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:26 am
XenoReiji Neato, now we need to make our own childfree village where the entry fee is getting sterilized that is SUCH an awesome idea! ....And we should keep bunnies *is obsessed*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 5:55 am
Foxglow XenoReiji Neato, now we need to make our own childfree village where the entry fee is getting sterilized that is SUCH an awesome idea! ....And we should keep bunnies *is obsessed*
Do want! surprised heart *seconds/thirds the notion*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 5:37 pm
This might be ideal for some people, but not for me, I don't think. Ideally, I would live in the middle of an untouched forrest like a hunter/gatherer, collecting berries, nuts, and plants to eat, and killing animals for their hides, using flint to start fires to keep away the bugs. Alas, land like this is hard to come by these days. I may be stuck with a village similar the one described in that article, in which case, I hope you will understand my grumpiness, future neighbors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 9:58 pm
I agree we need to allow bunnies... and kitties ninja and we need to teach them to be ninjas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 8:11 am
Ninja cat? Also do want. ninja That sounds like the most adorable security system ever. Also, it reminds me of Neko Shogun from Persona 4. I kept Neko Sogun until the very last fight because it was so cute and nulled/reflected so many elements. XD It was the last thing I used in the last battle too just because I wanted to, though it was many levels behind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 12:42 pm
Yes... and we will train them to survive on babies... ninja . eek We now have plans for trash island.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 12:49 pm
Babyvore ninja cats? surprised Awesome. However, wouldn't that leave them very hungry if we took them on Trash Island (TM)? We'd be away from babies for long periods of time. Bringing babies in just to feed the cats seems to kind of defeat the purpose.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 9:21 pm
Hmmm.. this is true... and a problem... ninja We would have to train them to think of babies as a rare delicacy so they are hunted down with extreme prejudice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 3:08 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:09 pm
XenoReiji Hmmm.. this is true... and a problem... ninja We would have to train them to think of babies as a rare delicacy so they are hunted down with extreme prejudice.
Mmm, I like this plan. cool
I think we'd need to train our ninjas to find bigger trees though. razz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 6:42 am
@Foxglow: cool EXACTLY only with swords and smoke bombs... and baby jerky.
Blue-chan, do you think we will have trees on trash island? O.o
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
