Welcome to Gaia! ::

We euthenize animals for so many reasons. If they attack someone, if they have a terminal illness, if they are suffering horribly and won't get better, or if we think it is what we need to do (ex: the dog shows aggression and will only get worse).
We also kill people for killing other people. But what about if they are suffering?
Let's face it, there are some terribly diseases out there, diseases that cause pain and agony for years and years until finally the persons dies. So why is it that we think it is humane to keep these people alive, if it is absolute that they are going to die?
I bring this up because I was watching an episode of L&O about a couple who gave there infant daughter enough pain killers to kill her, because she was diagnosed with a disease which would cause her unimaginable pain and suffering, from constant ache and pains and fragile bones, to slow loss of all of her senses, and they didn't want their daughter to have to go through that.

I think that the euthanization of people who want it and have a reason for it should be allowed. As for people who can't consent, whether it be because they can't speak or they are too young, the person in charge of their health can decide with the help of their doctors.
I mean, if we are fine with euthanizing people for legal reasons, why not do it to ease suffering as well?And not to say that this would be used in all cases of a terminal illness, but only in rarer cases in which it is literally impossible for the person to get better.


So what do you think?

If they have a terrible, terminal and incurable illness, and all one can do is administer painkillers until the painful death(say, severe radiation sickness). Or, if they're in terrible daily pain and there's nothing you can do...

Not a fan of the death penalty, so I don't support the idea in those cases.

As far as suffering from an incurable disease goes, I don't fully understand why this isn't an option for the person. When a pet has an incurable disease and your only options are to euthanize them now or have them be in pain until the disease kills them, everyone says that euthanizing them is the right choice. If it's humane to not make the animal suffer, why is it humane to keep a person in the same position alive for as long as possible?

Obviously it would only be available in specific circumstances (the disease is incurable and will eventually kill the patient, the person is in severe pain from the disease, etc.), and the person would have to consent to the procedure.

I believe in the death penalty, but maybe that's because we don't have it here.
I think if a person kills another person, then they should die the way their victim(s) did.

Getting back on topic, I believe a person has a right to choose if they're suffering from a terminal illness.
It's their life and clearly they're going to die, so if they would rather it be sooner than later then i don't believe others have the right to choose for them.
Especially if they're going to suffer!

I personally think that people with terminal illnesses should be able to take their life, or have someone do it for them if they are not physically able, if they want to.
The death penalty...it depends on what they did.

I agree with killing prisoners off. Why would I want to keep a lunatic alive in jail? Who can get food, have a warm place to sleep and drink for free! If someone has killed at least more than 6 people, they should be killed. I strongly believe rapist (at least 6 or more woman) and child molesters should be put to death too.

I think people with terrible illness should be able to have the choice to kill themselves. I wouldn't want to go through that kind of pain, and besides if I'm paralyzed on my bed. I would like to be killed, I would rather be dead than be paralyzed on a bed for the rest of my life. It would get so lonely. You would miss out on things and you wouldn't be able to take care of yourself. That is just something I couldn't handle. I do believe this should go into affect.

I believe that dangerous criminals deserve to be put down. It seems more humane than having them locked up the rest of their life possibly learning to become more dangerous and a bigger threat to society.