Welcome to Gaia! ::

Things you should know about me:

• I love intelligent trolls. Scholastic has been my only fun for quite some time.
  
• If you're one of the most intelligent, you're right up my alley. I've enjoyed our little war thus far, and I'm still amused. Nice to meet you.
  
• I've been debating with you purely for my own amusement as well. We're both enjoying this, so why stop now?
  
• As long as we're enjoying ourselves, I'm all for it.
  

This is probably a good place. No sense in deluging the thread much more. We've stretched the pages quite a bit already.

I figured as much. I was simply refusing to acknowledge it.

Don't worry. The folly of others amuses me.

Maybe in your private, fictional TOS. Responding to an insulting post is perfectly acceptable. Reporting insulting posts is what I like to call the first resort of the weak and unskilled in debate.

Sort of like leaving one of the m's out of 'grammatical?'

Was it good for you too?

Ah, a very good idea. I shall remove the fetters from my enormous intellect, and you can pray to the devil or whatever it is you do when you want to cease to be stupid.

Oh, no. I have to play with a handicap on Gaia. If I played with such an enormous advantage, it would offend my sense of fairness and might permanently alter the BBCode due to its immense gravitational pull.

Wow, you're right! It isn't a 50-50 test! False in this case was short for "You're completely ******** wrong and deliberately twisting the information, you massive heap of scrub wash, you." And I meant that in the best possible way.

My parliamentary debate book says you're wrong.

And here I thought I was in the real world already, you know, with having to make money and all to support my degree program. Oh darn.

So let me get this straight. When exactly did you stop beating your wife?

That's because they're out of your league. I'm just stepping on you because you're there. So, how about them fallacies?

And the ED you speak of is one in which all of the above are useless.
Congratulations on making yet another fundamentally flawed contention and ignoring the facts.
Your reputation isn't worth bothering with. It's the fallacious bullshit you spew that's fun to dissect.

Ah, but you're forgetting the fanboys. They count for more, since they're male and everyone knows that males > females. Incidentally, that's why I'm smarter than you. Our brains are three times the size of your brains. It's science. [/Anchorman]

It's simple. My arguments have been unrelated to your claims and could not have supported them, as they were about differing subjects. Moreover, you have rephrased your arguments in an attempt to make them less glaringly full of holes, and this is ignoring the fact that your arguments may not be proven as you initially stated them. As you have restated them, only the first is unsupportable, while the second is hardly a definitive statement at all, and is devoid of meaning and merit.

Oh noes! Sentence fragments might take over Gaia!
It's still fallacious, in case you were wondering. That's like saying the sky is blue, so apples are red.

I meant the implication, as you well know. "Pretty confident" equates to "I could be wrong," no?

Were it a fact or relevent, it would be. Because something may be does not mean anything definitive of the sort. Nice try, though.

Someone clearly failed to observe my flames in 2003. Oh well.

I don't have any reason to call you a bad person. I could, however, state that you're contradicting yourself (i.e. torpedoing your own argument), or are using blatantly flawed logic in an attempt to goad me into anger, thereby increasing the chances of me arguing against a point I agree with. However, I will do neither.
You have failed to make me angry, or to become confused and make silly blunders. In short, you're not a very effective troll.

That's advice. Claiming that the world somehow ceases to care and life gets more painful is fallacious, as both are unprovable as a generalization.

If I were either, I would likely be doing something other than perpetuate a point-by-point debate. I am neither, and I do not believe you are capable of supporting your claim.

Welcome to the land of sarcasm.

That's so cute, how you claim to have defined my purpose. I do, however agree that some need to experience pain or ruin in order for others to learn.

Not as obvious as how much I'm enjoying this.

What about... von Karma?

Oh, I'm hoping you're intelligent somewhere deep down, too.

I've addressed these above. I could have opted out long ago, but you're amusing me thus far.