|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 21, 2005 4:33 pm
oddly, im pro-death penalty, but also pro-life. what I can't believe is how some people who don't deserve to live are kept alive, but those who deserve life are given death. its MURDER! just MURDER YOUR WIFE! JUST LET HER DIE! i live in a very liberal town, and i am most DISGUSTED with the crap that i hear out of their mouths when they say "let the criminals live" and "let terry die"
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 10:22 am
I'm still angry over this case. It's not really something that's easy to forget, really. It's disgusting and immoral what they did, but I'm sure we all know that, already.
Edit: Sorry, not trying to bump the thread back up. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 8:32 pm
It is immoral and disgusting. Don't worry, doesn't seem like it, it just seems like you're reading this topic and have an opinion on it, and if opinions weren't still welcomed on this, it'd have been deleted long ago.
It sickens me that they let him get away with it. It's awful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 3:24 pm
Hoo-boy.
I have an opinion on this.
Miranda knows it.
But... Gah.
What a... devisive issue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 8:09 pm
[Terri Schaivo rant]
I supported the decision her husband made. To be honest, I don't think anyone should live a life like that unless they have some hope of coming out of the vegetative state. The way her parents acted though, made me sick. I feel like the parents were selfish keeping her alive. I wouldn't let my child live like that, if it was in my hands.
[/ end Terri Schaivo rant]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 8:17 pm
iluvcinnamoroll [Terri Schaivo rant] I supported the decision her husband made. To be honest, I don't think anyone should live a life like that unless they have some hope of coming out of the vegetative state. The way her parents acted though, made me sick. I feel like the parents were selfish keeping her alive. I wouldn't let my child live like that, if it was in my hands. [/ end Terri Schaivo rant]
Personally, I would have liked that problem to have stayed in the family, and not be the business of anyone.
But I support what her husband did.
She had NO chance of recovery.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 10:28 pm
Mcphee iluvcinnamoroll [Terri Schaivo rant] I supported the decision her husband made. To be honest, I don't think anyone should live a life like that unless they have some hope of coming out of the vegetative state. The way her parents acted though, made me sick. I feel like the parents were selfish keeping her alive. I wouldn't let my child live like that, if it was in my hands. [/ end Terri Schaivo rant]
Personally, I would have liked that problem to have stayed in the family, and not be the business of anyone.
But I support what her husband did.
She had NO chance of recovery.Not. True. The doctors said she had a chance of recovery. She WAS starting to improve when he pulled her out of therapy. He actively stopped something that was making her better and wouldn't let them keep going with it. While he was having kids with another woman. Oh yeah. THat's love alright.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 10:29 pm
The problem is that, at one point, she -did- have a chance of recovery, and the husband avoid it. From what I heard, at least.
If it had been obvious that she had had no chance at survival, the whole time, then yes, obviously the husband should have been able to take out the tube. But then, if that were the case, he would have taken it out a loong time ago.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 10:40 pm
I also object to the method. Dying a slow and painful death? If you want to mercy kill, at least make it painless. It's inhumane to cause someone to suffer for that long.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 10:49 pm
lymelady I also object to the method. Dying a slow and painful death? If you want to mercy kill, at least make it painless. It's inhumane to cause someone to suffer for that long. Except that there's legal issues with that, I believe. sweatdrop I'm all for changing those laws in these cases, except that I know it would be abused.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 10:54 pm
I.Am lymelady I also object to the method. Dying a slow and painful death? If you want to mercy kill, at least make it painless. It's inhumane to cause someone to suffer for that long. Except that there's legal issues with that, I believe. sweatdrop I'm all for changing those laws in these cases, except that I know it would be abused. Hollond is already abusing them They have forced euthinasia for the elderly, the young and sickly beofr ethe age of 12. How bout that, sorry grandma, we love you but yoru a burden so were having you killed. Sorry son, because you caught the flue, they want to kill you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 11:02 pm
I.Am lymelady I also object to the method. Dying a slow and painful death? If you want to mercy kill, at least make it painless. It's inhumane to cause someone to suffer for that long. Except that there's legal issues with that, I believe. sweatdrop I'm all for changing those laws in these cases, except that I know it would be abused. I completely agree... It was cruel to give her such a long and painful death. Like you said though, legal issues come in... It would be better for laws to be changed and allow people like Schaivo to die peacefully, but there will be people who screw it up and abuse it, therefore its a no go.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 7:00 am
The issue for me here is that . . . there was nothing wrong with her!!!! You're supposed to "let a person go" if she is dependent on machines and otherwise would proceed to a natural death. She was brain-damaged, but not deathly ill! They stopped feeding her. That's how they "let her go"! rolleyes scream
Following that logic, it would be legal and morally acceptable to stop feeding an infant. eek
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 5:28 pm
GreenInkling The issue for me here is that . . . there was nothing wrong with her!!!! You're supposed to "let a person go" if she is dependent on machines and otherwise would proceed to a natural death. She was brain-damaged, but not deathly ill! They stopped feeding her. That's how they "let her go"! rolleyes scream Following that logic, it would be legal and morally acceptable to stop feeding an infant. eek There are a few choicers who want that legal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
