|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:21 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:47 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 11:13 am
|
|
|
|
gundam fan zero wow you are stupid if you think funnels are that good. yes they are good but: 1. it would not do that much to the gundanium alloy since it is natrally beam resistent and after it is refined it is even more so. 2. char is a good pilot and it a newtype but don't think herro would lose that easily. 3. it took a freaken beam cannon to damage wing gundam's leg. have you compared the power difference of a funnel and a beam cannon firing? look into things before making a stupid post like this
do you know that a.) Gundarium armor in UC is not beam resistance b.) Funnels do not shoot beams, it's light-wave particles (or something like that)
Therefore, think about it, a remote, MOVING, firing mechanism. And the moving is not like regular movement, it's ******** instantaneous. With guns such as the Dober Cannon, or a Mega Beam Particle Cannon, is a WASTE. Even going close range is not smart idea, b/c you be facing not just one, but maybe two or three.
Please, LEARN GUNDAM MECHANISM. Do not just spew out jibberish
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 6:07 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 2:28 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 3:15 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:02 pm
|
|
|
|
personally don't think that a lot of people can beat char, since he and amuro are the first, as well as the best pilots in the whole gundam series. It is undoubtable that Amuro is really strong, and if Char can fight on an equal ground with Amuro, that proves that Char is also something. However, when you look at the Wing series, it is questionable how strong can the characters be. In my opinion, Char is definitely better than Zech in piloting. Also, their gundam makes a difference. Char's gundam is much more powerful as far as agility and attack range. Yes, Zech's gundam is as well strong, yet its movement is not fast enough in comparison to Char's. So I'd say Char is better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:29 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:05 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:49 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 8:58 pm
|
|
|
|
gundam fan zero i don't want to be rude here but neither sazabi or tallgeese 3 are gundams they are ms. A Gundam is a Mobile Suit, but a Mobile Suit need not be a Gundam.
Quote: In CE standards, in my point of view, the only CLEAR distinction that they are gundams are based on the OS they operate on As good a rule-of-thumb as any when it comes to CE Gundam--though what it says on the model kit boxes is usually the final say as to whether it's a "Gundam" or not.
Quote: In AC, I thought that being called a gundam meant that you had Gundarium alloy (and I thought Tallgesse had that) Gundanium Alloy. A Mobile Suit can utilize Gundanium Alloy without being a Gundam. Look at Mercurius and Vayeate.
Quote: I really don't know about UC though... Honestly, there have been Mono-Eyed Gundams. And Blue Destiny 1 sported a GM head... Rule of thumb in UC Gundam: it's a Gundam when it's called a Gundam (though the MSN-00100 Hyaku Shiki is doctored in).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 3:21 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 5:03 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:12 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 2:03 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|