|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:07 pm
The Stolen Turnabout - Let's see, Ron admits he tampered with the crime scene by shoving Kane's body into his safe, and doesn't get punished at all for it?
He also confesses to stealing the first four treasures in Bullard's files as Mask*DeMasque. The "double jeopardy" excuse is bull; Phoenix never proved Ron wasn't DeMasque, he just proved Ron didn't steal the Sacred Urn. Again, Ronnie gets off scot-free.
Recipe for Turnabout - Okay, Tigre slipped up in the end about knowing which bottle had the poison. That doesn't prove he was the one who poisoned Elg, Godot could have just claimed Tigre was indeed impersonating Phoenix in Maggey's first trial, in which case he would have know about the bottle anyway.
Bridge to the Turnabout - Hey, way to murder Maya's mother and then try to pin it on poor Iris. a*****e.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 1:19 pm
Stolen Turnabout: True about Ron not getting in some sort of trouble for tampering with the crime scene.
Yet, the only thing I can think of about the DeMasque thing is that since he confessed to the first four 'double jeopardy' applies in some way. I don't know.
Recipe for Turnabout: That just made me angry in a way. How could he just concede that easily? I wanted to smack Phoenix for thinking that'd work, but then Godot didn't argue back and my wanting to smack shifted.
Bridge to Turnabout: I'm editing this a bit since I just replayed the case. I didn't really find him a complete a**. Iris and Misty were willing to do the roles that Godot suggested, they didn't have to participate. Misty was even willing to die to save Maya. If anything, I just thought he was vengeful towards Dahlia and wanted to kill her, not Misty. He is an a** in the way that he knew it was Misty, yet still killed her.Hopefully he was better as a defense attorney.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 5:54 pm
actally in the 3rd trial Godot wasn't the Proscutor in Maggey's 1th Trial it was Payne.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 6:01 pm
Still, that doesn't change the fact he could argue Tigre was really impersonating, so he could've known the difference. confused
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emotionless Hitokiri Crew
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 11:25 pm
Sakasagami no Yura The Stolen Turnabout -
Recipe for Turnabout - Okay, Tigre slipped up in the end about knowing which bottle had the poison. That doesn't prove he was the one who poisoned Elg, Godot could have just claimed Tigre was indeed impersonating Phoenix in Maggey's first trial, in which case he would have know about the bottle anyway.I dunno... regardless, he had a motive, was known to be at the scene and pretty much admitted that he knew about the poison. I doubt any proving of he did it or not was necessary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 7:18 am
Emotionless Hitokiri Sakasagami no Yura The Stolen Turnabout -
Recipe for Turnabout - Okay, Tigre slipped up in the end about knowing which bottle had the poison. That doesn't prove he was the one who poisoned Elg, Godot could have just claimed Tigre was indeed impersonating Phoenix in Maggey's first trial, in which case he would have know about the bottle anyway.I dunno... regardless, he had a motive, was known to be at the scene and pretty much admitted that he knew about the poison. I doubt any proving of he did it or not was necessary. Let me explain.. I believe in that case,capcom messed up.Most likely,it was meant to originally be incriminating that Tigre knew about the green bottle.It was never used as evidence in the first trial,and there was no way for Tigre to know about it before.I think capcom just realized it wouldn't make sense,and didn't like the idea of reusing a theme(poisoned medicine),and changed it...which in turn,made most of the case odd.It's just a theory though...but it makes more sense that Tigre knowing about the medicine would be more incriminating then the glass bottle...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 10:06 am
Emotionless Hitokiri Sakasagami no Yura The Stolen Turnabout -
Recipe for Turnabout - Okay, Tigre slipped up in the end about knowing which bottle had the poison. That doesn't prove he was the one who poisoned Elg, Godot could have just claimed Tigre was indeed impersonating Phoenix in Maggey's first trial, in which case he would have know about the bottle anyway.I dunno... regardless, he had a motive, was known to be at the scene and pretty much admitted that he knew about the poison. I doubt any proving of he did it or not was necessary. When do you ever not have to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt who the true killer is? In case 2-2, Franzy basically says "I don't care that all the evidence points to Ini and your explanation makes perfect sense; if you can't provide a motive, you lose."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 6:52 pm
Sakasagami no Yura Emotionless Hitokiri Sakasagami no Yura The Stolen Turnabout -
Recipe for Turnabout - Okay, Tigre slipped up in the end about knowing which bottle had the poison. That doesn't prove he was the one who poisoned Elg, Godot could have just claimed Tigre was indeed impersonating Phoenix in Maggey's first trial, in which case he would have know about the bottle anyway.I dunno... regardless, he had a motive, was known to be at the scene and pretty much admitted that he knew about the poison. I doubt any proving of he did it or not was necessary. When do you ever not have to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt who the true killer is? In case 2-2, Franzy basically says "I don't care that all the evidence points to Ini and your explanation makes perfect sense; if you can't provide a motive, you lose." Yeah I was just staring blankly at that thinking "WTF? The evidence cleary points to Ini! The motive is also obivious! Franzy was just being a sore loser!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 11:05 am
Sepulchre Still, that doesn't change the fact he could argue Tigre was really impersonating, so he could've known the difference. confused Did Godot even care if someone had impersonated Phoenix, he hates him. stare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 11:51 am
Skyeblue777 Sepulchre Still, that doesn't change the fact he could argue Tigre was really impersonating, so he could've known the difference. confused Did Godot even care if someone had impersonated Phoenix, he hates him. stare I doubt he would care.
...
But he could've still argued it, yes?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 2:12 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:47 pm
Though it is the prosecutor's duty to point out such things, isn't it the judge who's supposed to lay down the discipline and give ruling on whether or not the person is a criminal?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 10:21 am
Yes, which is why it's the prosecutor's job to convince the judge the defendant is guilty. The judge is supposed to be an impartial mediator of sorts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 8:00 pm
pirahnaPANCAKES Though it is the prosecutor's duty to point out such things, isn't it the judge who's supposed to lay down the discipline and give ruling on whether or not the person is a criminal? Yeah I think thats true but knowing the judge it's sort of hard for him to do that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:46 pm
Skyeblue777 pirahnaPANCAKES Though it is the prosecutor's duty to point out such things, isn't it the judge who's supposed to lay down the discipline and give ruling on whether or not the person is a criminal? Yeah I think thats true but knowing the judge it's sort of hard for him to do that.
I thought it was funny that his brother has a Canadian accent in the US version.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
