| Film or Digital? |
| Film |
|
12% |
[ 2 ] |
| Digital |
|
31% |
[ 5 ] |
| Both! |
|
56% |
[ 9 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2005 11:47 am
Time to get this guild started! xd heart
I love both film and digital forms. They both have their ups and downs, so I consider them equal in value. 3nodding
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2005 7:23 pm
Digital! It's just easier! But more expenisve...batteries...batteries...and um...batteries. I should really invest in some rechargeable ones.
Aargh,it took me three minutes just to post this...evil errors... sad
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2005 7:41 am
uhhhm both! smile I don't have a film camera tho. I have a digital. but I've heard that film has better quality (if you know what your doing of course) but I don't have money to always buy film sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2005 10:22 am
Digital, all the way. Whenever I shoot with film I feel like I'm wasting it... redface
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2005 6:52 pm
hm, so far, I am the only film vote... heh. I Prefer film over digital because I have more fun with it. I have access to a darkroom so I find there is much more to do with film than digital. they both have their advantages tho.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 8:50 pm
I personally go digital for convenience, its cheaper in the long run (no film or darkroom costs) and chemicals smell... I used to be in the darkroom alot, I still do when I need REALLY hi contrast black and white images. for everything else, theres digital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 9:37 pm
mmm, digital i guess, but i want to try film. because i never have.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 11:17 pm
@Michiura Samantha: You most certainly should invest in rechargable ones exclaim
For my personal use digital is nice because I use it more for reference and that doesn't require HIGH resolution. However if you wanted it for the photography it self I think film I nicer, I'm not very experienced though and I've never been in "the dark room".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2005 12:23 am
when I worked in a photo lab, I got all the AA batteries I can handle out of sigle use cameras. xd
I still have a bunch left; however, recharables are so much better. I have a Quantum 1+ (a nice sealed lead acid batter), aswell. it runs my old film camera and it will run my new flashes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 3:47 pm
[ Message temporarily off-line ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:10 pm
I like both......it really depends on what the subject matter/style is for me.
That reminds me, I haven't posted what my tools are yet: A Canon Pro1 for digi and an old '70's Pentax MX for flims whee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2005 5:34 am
[ Message temporarily off-line ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2005 10:32 am
I'm not skilled enough to be able to take rolls of film yet without it being lots of money out of my pocket, so I have a digital. When I get above amatuer level and would like to make photography a more regular thing for me( I'm more for drawing) I might get a real film camera...but I'm pretty sure I'll be sticking with digi for a good amount of my life...I'm just more responsible with my electronic media..and willing to work with it.. @_@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:39 pm
[ Message temporarily off-line ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 5:47 pm
I like film. Developing my own pictures is so much fun...I just wished I had access to a darkroom!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
