|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2004 5:32 pm
When we're taking over a country, which one should we take over. It should have the following specifications.
- Preferably Not Desert
- Not starved
- Not close to war mongering countries.
- Tropical (Come on, you know you want to live somewhere tropical. At least not like Greenland.)
- Not over-populated (We need a voting majority, so less than 3 million people if we "convert" Gaia and Gaia has grown to around 2 million people.
Does anyone have any ideas?
- Pretty large, as it will be supporting over 2 million people. No tiny islands.
Ideas (Will add as they are posted.)
- The Bahamas (At 26 people per square km)
Problems - Almost no farmland. Economy will have to be based on non-farming, food will have to be shipped in)
Come on people! Ideas!
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 4:30 am
Aeridea Mr. Grunkalunka Shouldn't our first country be a desolate little hell hole? If we manage to turn it around it'll look really good for our credibility and leadership skills. The problem is that we probably won't be able to turn it around easily. We should save big problem areas for when we have other countries under our control with more people who will help us. Ex- we don't want to try to get into the Middle East just yet. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 9:41 am
Mr. Grunkalunka Aeridea Mr. Grunkalunka Shouldn't our first country be a desolate little hell hole? If we manage to turn it around it'll look really good for our credibility and leadership skills. The problem is that we probably won't be able to turn it around easily. We should save big problem areas for when we have other countries under our control with more people who will help us. Ex- we don't want to try to get into the Middle East just yet. sweatdrop Still, it would probably be better to start off in a rather developed country and work from there. After we have a solid start, then we can move on to renovating these 'fixer' upper's'...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 1:20 pm
regane id go for belgium or something like that, i doubt it has less than 3M people, but you do get to be member of the EU, btw solving (major) problems in a country would be easier once we united a bunch of nations, so we have a decent economie and resources to solve it. But belgium is part of the EU. If the EU notices what we're doing we're screwed. I'm not sure if we're thinking a hostile take over or what, but avoiding countires that have powerful friends would be a good idea. We need a place no one cares we're taking over, so long as we don't start killing everyone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 1:26 pm
Myythren regane id go for belgium or something like that, i doubt it has less than 3M people, but you do get to be member of the EU, btw solving (major) problems in a country would be easier once we united a bunch of nations, so we have a decent economie and resources to solve it. But belgium is part of the EU. If the EU notices what we're doing we're screwed. I'm not sure if we're thinking a hostile take over or what, but avoiding countires that have powerful friends would be a good idea. We need a place no one cares we're taking over, so long as we don't start killing everyone. of course im not thinking of a agresive take over, just gaining a superior political party, that does realy good, and some time later start similar parties(with drifent names) in countries around it like holland, germany, luxemburg, france etc etc actualy i hope the eu will develop to become a nation like the us (in goverment form, and if have strong party's before that happens, than thing will be going realy well
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2005 7:47 pm
Mytharis When we're taking over a country, which one should we take over. It should have the following specifications. - Preferably Not Desert - Not starved - Not close to war mongering countries. - Tropical (Come on, you know you want to live somewhere tropical. At least not like Greenland.) - Not over-populated (We need a voting majority, so less than 3 million people if we "convert" Gaia and Gaia has grown to around 2 million people. Does anyone have any ideas? - Pretty large, as it will be supporting over 2 million people. No tiny islands. Ideas (Will add as they are posted.) - The Bahamas (At 26 people per square km) Problems - Almost no farmland. Economy will have to be based on non-farming, food will have to be shipped in) Come on people! Ideas! But you forget, though tiny islands have little land, they are easier to take over. So, what we need to do is just take over a few at a time. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 12:25 am
Look, after my long hiatus I post here first. Heh.
Anyways, wouldn't we need somewhere out of the way, so that the general public wouldn't notice right away. Somewhere in the Pacific, probably. ANYWAYS.... glad to see the Darkstar Party is getting off to a start.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 8:11 am
Mistress DragonFlame Mytharis When we're taking over a country, which one should we take over. It should have the following specifications. - Preferably Not Desert - Not starved - Not close to war mongering countries. - Tropical (Come on, you know you want to live somewhere tropical. At least not like Greenland.) - Not over-populated (We need a voting majority, so less than 3 million people if we "convert" Gaia and Gaia has grown to around 2 million people. Does anyone have any ideas? - Pretty large, as it will be supporting over 2 million people. No tiny islands. Ideas (Will add as they are posted.) - The Bahamas (At 26 people per square km) Problems - Almost no farmland. Economy will have to be based on non-farming, food will have to be shipped in) Come on people! Ideas! But you forget, though tiny islands have little land, they are easier to take over. So, what we need to do is just take over a few at a time. 3nodding Well, if we did take over a few, we could unite their government. Good idea!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 1:13 pm
Mytharis Mistress DragonFlame Mytharis When we're taking over a country, which one should we take over. It should have the following specifications. - Preferably Not Desert - Not starved - Not close to war mongering countries. - Tropical (Come on, you know you want to live somewhere tropical. At least not like Greenland.) - Not over-populated (We need a voting majority, so less than 3 million people if we "convert" Gaia and Gaia has grown to around 2 million people. Does anyone have any ideas? - Pretty large, as it will be supporting over 2 million people. No tiny islands. Ideas (Will add as they are posted.) - The Bahamas (At 26 people per square km) Problems - Almost no farmland. Economy will have to be based on non-farming, food will have to be shipped in) Come on people! Ideas! But you forget, though tiny islands have little land, they are easier to take over. So, what we need to do is just take over a few at a time. 3nodding Well, if we did take over a few, we could unite their government. Good idea! Starting off with islands is a very good idea. No one will notice, and in a short amount of time, we could get a fairly large empire. Very good idea indeed. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 8:29 pm
I vote iceland. Why? Free hot water, the water's terrible for naval attack, the landscape is beautiful and mostly non developed. Actually, let's not take over iceland, because they're one of the few countries that doesn't need it. they have a working system of government. Oh well.
Islands, eh? How about setting up on un colonised ones first? That would require an investment though...still, so would the rest of this!
*ponders other means of world domination.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 5:38 am
IF you all are thinking islands why not hawaii or indonisia.
Hawaii- seperate island could create problems though. But if we have a peaceful take ove we may gain control of Oahu and Pearl Harbor. Thats a good place for a main base.
Indonease-(did i spell that right?) Larger has good land. Plus it nice to live in. Its also away from EU and someone said earlier that if Eu knows what were doing were screwed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 10:36 am
Rhidan IF you all are thinking islands why not hawaii or indonisia. Hawaii- seperate island could create problems though. But if we have a peaceful take ove we may gain control of Oahu and Pearl Harbor. Thats a good place for a main base. Indonease-(did i spell that right?) Larger has good land. Plus it nice to live in. Its also away from EU and someone said earlier that if Eu knows what were doing were screwed. Hawaii = US = We're screwed. We can't fight with such a big military power. Indonesia - Too large. There are 238 million people in Indonesia - No voting majority.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
