| Do you think there shold be more than three stages of evolution and Lv's that go past 100? |
| Yes. More than three stages of evolution and pokemon Lv's that go way past 100. |
|
33% |
[ 9 ] |
| Yes, more than three stages of evolution. |
|
11% |
[ 3 ] |
| Yes. I think that all pokemon should have Lv's that go past 100. |
|
7% |
[ 2 ] |
| Yes. I think that most pokemon should have Lv's that go past 100. |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Yes. I think that some pokemon should have Lv's that go past 100. |
|
7% |
[ 2 ] |
| I think that very few pokemon should have Lv's that go past 100. |
|
3% |
[ 1 ] |
| None of the above. |
|
29% |
[ 8 ] |
| Entei!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
7% |
[ 2 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 4:19 pm
Do you think there should be more than three stages of evolution for pokemon?
Do you think the pokemon Lv's should go past 100?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 4:22 pm
I think that there should be more than 3 stages of pokemon evolution.
I also think that all pokemon Lv's should go past 100.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 5:04 pm
Yes. There should be more than three stages of evolutions for pokemon. I also, agree that pokemon Lv's should go beyond 100.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 8:16 pm
I think that pokemon should go past lv. 100, but I think it might get too complicated if there were more than three stages of evolution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 8:36 pm
i think its fine how it is now
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 9:24 am
It would be more complicated but, there would be more types of pokemon.
What do you think?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 5:07 pm
I think that's an excellent point. It does open up to a lot more variety. The possibilities would be endless with levels that go past 100...I'd love to see a match like that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2008 8:55 am
i think it would be too much if they had more than 3 evolutions, but it would be sweet if they could go past lv 100. It could be like disgaea and then we'd have lv 9999 pokemon!!!!^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:01 pm
It would take a long time to get a pokemon to the lv 9999.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 9:44 pm
thatd be the point tho. I got bored with Pokemon Blue after I had six of them all at 100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 3:40 pm
I think that intense levels like that might make it more interesting. No limits! That'd be awesome!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2008 12:56 pm
Agree'd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 8:35 pm
I think it is fine already.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 28, 2008 4:23 pm
Leonardo95 Do you think there should be more than three stages of evolution for pokemon?
Do you think the pokemon Lv's should go past 100? In think that they should be more than three stages cuz it jus makes like boring. And the levels should hav no limits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 5:52 am
No, the lv. limit is good....lv.100 is high enough.
No, because at certain times.....(like Larvitar's evolutions) it takes forever to get to Tyranitar.....Three stages of evoulutions are good enough for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
