|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 9:24 am
To dedicate oneself to one other person
or
To dedicate oneself to all people
Choose one
and explain why...or not
but choose only one
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 11:43 am
To dedicate yourself to all. Although it is important to give our all to one person, it is also important to help others.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 3:53 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 8:57 pm
It is hard to choose isn't it?
with two replies so far both seem torn between the two
neither able to make a solid choice
on one hand
you could dedicate yourself to one person
perhaps that relationship will thrive
but take a look around are we not compelled to act
to make corrections where we feel there is need
I don't think I could sit and watch disasters one after another
the call for action is just too strong to ignore
now on the other hand
by dedicating oneself to the masses
what happens to those closest and dearest to you?
will they understand why you do what you do or
will they feel the pain of betrayal and abandonment?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 3:02 pm
If you decided to help all it wouldn't necessarily be abandoment of those close to you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 5:16 pm
Well..if you ask what is MORE noble then one-one part because then you have all of your faith in that one person. You would give all for that one person because that's all who you have to give it too. Thus it would be easier to dedicated oneself to one person, opposed to many.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 6:14 pm
Unfading_Beauty_Within If you decided to help all it wouldn't necessarily be abandoment of those close to you. your right, however, their feelings are their own all we can do is aferm in some way our continued conectedness
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 6:24 pm
darknessfairy29 Well..if you ask what is MORE noble then one-one part because then you have all of your faith in that one person. You would give all for that one person because that's all who you have to give it too. Thus it would be easier to dedicated oneself to one person, opposed to many. so what would you choose?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 7:03 pm
lordstar darknessfairy29 Well..if you ask what is MORE noble then one-one part because then you have all of your faith in that one person. You would give all for that one person because that's all who you have to give it too. Thus it would be easier to dedicated oneself to one person, opposed to many. so what would you choose?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:04 pm
darknessfairy29 lordstar darknessfairy29 Well..if you ask what is MORE noble then one-one part because then you have all of your faith in that one person. You would give all for that one person because that's all who you have to give it too. Thus it would be easier to dedicated oneself to one person, opposed to many. so what would you choose? how would you explain to someone why you do the things you do? why you made the choice you made
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 5:24 am
lordstar darknessfairy29 lordstar darknessfairy29 Well..if you ask what is MORE noble then one-one part because then you have all of your faith in that one person. You would give all for that one person because that's all who you have to give it too. Thus it would be easier to dedicated oneself to one person, opposed to many. so what would you choose? how would you explain to someone why you do the things you do? why you made the choice you made
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 4:48 pm
I completely agree with darknessfairy all the way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 3:39 pm
Thats how I feel
sometimes no matter how many times I explain the message still gets lost
its frustrating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
