|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:21 pm
Who thinks if Hitler waited to attack Russia that he would win the war?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 11:40 am
I seem to remember that Hitler had a good reason for attacking Russia when he did...>.> Or maybe he just didn't learn from Nepoleon....
Though I don't think he should have divided up his troops if he wanted to win.
I'm glad he lost though. I have a special hate for Hitler.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VampirePumpkins Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 9:53 pm
I am actually a supporter of his ideas, but never to that extent killing is never right no matter how you feel about some one.
I do find it poetic humor tho how these European conquers keep loosing because they attack Russia loosing to the same tactics. He only attacked Russia for all there food supply. Russia probably would of given the Nazi army some of it since they where allies. Hitler just didn't want to lower himself to ask another country that he seen as inferior for help.
If he even of waited till he took out Brittan and summer time when it was less cold the Nazi army could of won in a quick blitz.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 3:11 pm
If Hitler had stuck with his nonagression pact (signed in 1939) with Soviet Russia and concentrated on western Europe, the Nazis would have been more successful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
