Welcome to Gaia! ::

Reply The Pro-life Guild
Permanent Birth Control: It's a commin'. Goto Page: 1 2 3 4 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

DCVI
Vice Captain

PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 7:22 am


http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1865975,00.html

Quote:
Getting your tubes tied is not the most appealing phrase, but it's way more user-friendly than sterilization. Maybe that's why the maker of Essure--a newer, cheaper, faster, scalpel-free alternative to tubal ligation--is marketing the procedure as "permanent birth control."


It took just two minutes for Theresa Jackson to get sterilized. On a recent afternoon in Gallatin, Tenn., the 35-year-old mother of three lay on an exam table in the office of her ob-gyn, Dr. Alan Bennett, with her feet in stirrups and her husband by her side. She was awake and relaxed enough to let me watch (weird, I know) as Bennett inserted first a thin camera into her uterus and then, using a video monitor as a guide, a small coil into each of her Fallopian tubes. Afterward, Jackson walked to her car and went home to her kids. (See the Year in Health, from A to Z.)

Each year about 700,000 women in the U.S. get their tubes tied, with the surgeries typically requiring general anesthesia, a hospital stay and a week of recovery. But according to Millennium Research Group, there are plenty of women who are done having kids but don't want to go under the knife. The health-care data firm projects the female-sterilization market will more than triple, from $80 million in 2007 to $245 million, by 2012, as these women opt for quick fixes like Essure that can cost patients as little as a doctor's visit co-pay.

Jackson said the local-anesthesia shots she got before the implantation were "painful." And afterward, she had cramps for a few hours akin to the ones during her period. The 1 1/2-in.-long (38 mm) coils--which are like pen springs but smaller and softer--contain fibers that irritate the tubes and prompt scar tissue to grow into and around the tiny loops. After three months, the Fallopian tubes are blocked, preventing eggs from reaching the uterus to be fertilized.

Approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2002, Essure coils were implanted mostly in hospitals until last year, when Conceptus, the Mountain View, Calif., manufacturer, started training lots of docs to perform the procedure in their offices. The firm recently launched its first big advertising campaign. Rival company Hologic hopes to gain FDA approval in 2009 for Adiana, a soft silicone polymer similarly inserted to seal off the Fallopian tubes.

Unlike some tubal-ligation methods, Essure cannot be reversed. One general concern among doctors is that women who choose to get sterilized might later change their minds. In a study in Obstetrics & Gynecology of 11,232 women who had been voluntarily sterilized, 20% of those who were younger than 30 at the time of the operation felt regret later, compared with 6% of those who were older than 30. Bennett, who stopped performing tubal ligations a year ago and now sterilizes only with Essure, says, "The most important job we have is to make sure people are absolutely certain." He discussed the issue for a year with Chastity Taylor, who is only 29 and has one daughter, before implanting the coils in her in September. The doctor, his patient and her husband are convinced it was the right choice; otherwise, Taylor says, "I would have stayed on the IUD forever."

Of course, there is another choice for couples who don't want to take any chances--right, gents? But twice as many married women as married men in the U.S. get sterilized. "I would've gotten a vasectomy, if that's what she wanted," says Theresa Jackson's husband Mike. "But then we talked about Essure," he says. "And I'm a sissy."


...scar tissue? It makes you infertile by scar tissue?

Isn't that bad?

Regardless. Wow.
eek
PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 8:05 pm


Scar tissue can do that (which the reason why have the women that have endometriosis and other problems that may cause scar tissue to build up are infertile).

That is interesting but I personally wouldn't do it. After having an endoscope done, I try to avoid anything like that or worse unless necessary. But now that it's cheaper and easier, more woman can get their wish.

rweghrheh


lymelady
Vice Captain

PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 12:46 am


Well...more women will get it except that doctors are still not going to do it if you're under 30 and don't have kids. Unless you take a lot of time persuading. This woman who had to consider it for an entire year had a daughter already; I'm willing to bet that if she hadn't, the doctor wouldn't have agreed to do it. That happens a lot already, I don't think this will change anything, especially since this doesn't even have a chance of reversal the way that tubal litigation does.
PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 7:59 pm


There are apparently gynos in my area who are certified to do it, so I'll look into it and be sure to let y'all know if I get it done. 3nodding My mom's worried that it could puncture your uterus, but seeing as it's not even in your uterus, and it's not exactly sharp or anything, it doesn't seem too bad. I want to see one, just out of curiosity.

La Veuve Zin

Rainbow Smoker

5,650 Points
  • Mega Tipsy 100
  • Forum Sophomore 300
  • Ultimate Player 200

KConn12

PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:37 pm


It sounds painful. confused
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 7:19 pm


It honestly sounds less painful than childbirth xd

It probably isn't all that painful really unless something goes wrong. I could be wrong.

lymelady
Vice Captain


Nangoku

PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 8:08 pm


I actually work at a women's clinic and Essure is completely safe and WONDERFUL!
I don't have it myself since in order to get permanent birth control you have to have children or be over 35 I think it is. But our doctors perform this procedure on a daily basis and we've had overwhelming success. The vast majority of women love it and have had no problems with it.
PostPosted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:51 pm


Nangoku
I actually work at a women's clinic and Essure is completely safe and WONDERFUL!
I don't have it myself since in order to get permanent birth control you have to have children or be over 35 I think it is. But our doctors perform this procedure on a daily basis and we've had overwhelming success. The vast majority of women love it and have had no problems with it.


So it's safe? What about side effects? Does it have any (I always think it's important to know about it and most stuff have some side effects, even if rare).

It's not really painful?

Not getting done anything time soon (not that they will as i'm not 35 nor do I have children), but it would be good to know about if I ever decided to have it done in the future (by then, there may even for options).

rweghrheh


Rosary16

PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 5:14 pm


I'm not a fan of birth control, but it sounds better than abortion.
PostPosted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:53 pm


Eeeeyah. Irreversible, unnecessary procedures (where "unnecessary" means having a procedure done that doesn't actually treat anything wrong with you), or even semi-irreversible, unnecessary procedures give me the heebie jeebies. I'm hesitant to even get a tattoo. sweatdrop

That and....scar tissue....yeah.

*shrugs* Well....if it's safe and it floats your boat.

Cyanna


A Menina Pianista

PostPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:09 am


I do not like sharp foreign objects in my orifices, including IUDs, braces, and now these. I mean... a coil? Like, the metal spring that holds notepads together (smaller, but still)? gonk eek crying Owwwwwww. Condoms for me, thanks. I guess to some women it would be quicker than getting snipped and propably safer, so, I guess it's good. ^ ^

... coils... irritation... gonk God, just stick a bottle brush up there while you're at it, maybe some steel wool...
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:09 am


Scar tissue isn't 'bad' it just is tissue that is more rough, the process works because the lining of the uterus is where the fertilized egg needs to attach too, so in basic terms the egg doesn't attach to the uterus, and is ejected at the menstruation period, I assume.

Scar tissue on major organs that are necessary like your liver (cirrhosis) is bad however.

Rainbowfied Mouse

6,200 Points
  • Conversationalist 100
  • Forum Junior 100
  • Wall Street 200

I.Am
Captain

Quotable Tycoon

7,825 Points
  • Money Never Sleeps 200
  • Signature Look 250
  • Forum Regular 100
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:45 am


Rainbowfied Mouse
Scar tissue isn't 'bad' it just is tissue that is more rough, the process works because the lining of the uterus is where the fertilized egg needs to attach too, so in basic terms the egg doesn't attach to the uterus, and is ejected at the menstruation period, I assume.

Scar tissue on major organs that are necessary like your liver (cirrhosis) is bad however.
Well, you've gotta admit though, it sounds incredibly unpleasant. If someone said, "Hey, we can sterilize you by scarring your testicles so much they can't push sperm up to your p***s instead of just snipping your testicles of," I would say, "Um... I don't think so."

Course, I'm not interested in being sterilized anyways, and any sort of sterilization generally involves scarring of some sort. But this still sounds incredibly unpleasant, even compared to the usual tube tying. It seems like it would create an itch that you just can't reach until it finished scarring. That'd drive me insane.
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 6:56 am


I.Am
Rainbowfied Mouse
Scar tissue isn't 'bad' it just is tissue that is more rough, the process works because the lining of the uterus is where the fertilized egg needs to attach too, so in basic terms the egg doesn't attach to the uterus, and is ejected at the menstruation period, I assume.

Scar tissue on major organs that are necessary like your liver (cirrhosis) is bad however.
Well, you've gotta admit though, it sounds incredibly unpleasant. If someone said, "Hey, we can sterilize you by scarring your testicles so much they can't push sperm up to your p***s instead of just snipping your testicles of," I would say, "Um... I don't think so."

Course, I'm not interested in being sterilized anyways, and any sort of sterilization generally involves scarring of some sort. But this still sounds incredibly unpleasant, even compared to the usual tube tying. It seems like it would create an itch that you just can't reach until it finished scarring. That'd drive me insane.


In all fairness you wouldn't know the difference. People with Cirrhosis don't even realize until really it's too late. But, yeah, I think I rather get a snip than a spring placed inside me... though I do not support birth control, but it's still much better than the other option for birth control >.>

Rainbowfied Mouse

6,200 Points
  • Conversationalist 100
  • Forum Junior 100
  • Wall Street 200

lymelady
Vice Captain

PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 12:50 pm


Rainbowfied Mouse
Scar tissue isn't 'bad' it just is tissue that is more rough, the process works because the lining of the uterus is where the fertilized egg needs to attach too, so in basic terms the egg doesn't attach to the uterus, and is ejected at the menstruation period, I assume.

Scar tissue on major organs that are necessary like your liver (cirrhosis) is bad however.
I don't think it works quite like that. This is about the fallopian tubes, not the uterus.

What you're talking about involves the endometrium, but this procedure keeps the sperm from ever reaching the eggs because the fallopian tubes are blocked.

I wonder whether this has a heightened risk of ectopic pregnancy, actually, since there's a failure rate.
Reply
The Pro-life Guild

Goto Page: 1 2 3 4 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum