OK. I realize that each person has their own creative license, and who the hell am I to reef on that, right? Well, this is the reviews section and everybody has to take some sort of constructive criticism, even if the review is a cold and fact-stating article. Here's my take on this story.

This, while not a long prelude, was a little difficult to muddle through. I understood it, the grammar wasn't half-bad, but if one is to get a complete story, one should not mix present with past tenses. (I.E. [and this is a perfect example] I then pull from a special case a package of silver bullets. It was my last case and they cannot go to waste, it takes too many resources to acquire this much pure silver.) If one is going to do a present tense, hope nobody minds, but I'm going to use this snippet, this is what it would look like. "I then pull from a special case, a package of silver bullets. It is my last case, and I cannot let them go waste. It just takes up too many resources to acquire this much pure silver."

Now, not much was changed, merely some punctuation in the first sentence, and I broke up the second sentence. But, if you will look at the original and look at my example, there is no mix of past and present and is much more fluid. Now, you could go purely third person, which would look more like this: "I then pulled a package of silver bullets from a special case. It was my last case, which could not be allowed to go to waste; pure silver was a resource that I couldn't afford to go through too often."

Beyond that, it was a good read, something I would not mind continuing to read, though werewolves and hunters are a bit cliche at this point. Keep up the good work, and I hope you get something out of this.