|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casting Pearls night Captain
|
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:03 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 3:55 pm
Quote: McCarthy’s Musings: The Friday Five Remembers…Jay Heaps and Ben OlsenBy Kyle McCarthy, Goal.com Two of the more familiar faces in MLS won't be around to take the field next season. New England defender Jay Heaps and D.C. United midfielder Ben Olsen both called it quits over the past couple of weeks. Both players were constant presences in the league for over a decade and came to personify their clubs. As soccer fans across the United States anxiously await the outcome of the World Cup draw today, the Friday Five discusses why MLS won't be the same without two of its most notable veterans. 1. (Primarily) one-club men. In an age of transience, Heaps and Olsen spent the vast majority of their careers with New England and D.C., respectively. Sure, there were those brief (Olsen's one-season loan stint at Nottingham Forest) and not-as-brief (Heaps' two-and-a-half years with Miami) stints somewhere else, but these two players will always be associated with the clubs they turned out for season after season. These days, there's something to be said for that. 2. Evolution in the face of adversity. Perhaps the most remarkable thing about both players is how they managed to adapt their games over the course of the years without fading into irrelevance. Olsen made his name as a right winger before a series of ankle injuries robbed him of much of his pace. Instead of folding up shop, Olsen turned into a defensive midfielder good enough to travel to the World Cup in 2006. Heaps started out as a midfielder and fell into a role as a fullback who, by his own admission, wasn't particularly tidy in his defensive third. As the years progressed, Heaps improved considerably as a defender and eventually earned four caps with the U.S. national team in the CONCACAF Gold Cup this summer. 3. Intensity and competitiveness. Some players take off plays. Others take off games. Heaps and Olsen, well, they didn't take off anything. Every moment on the field meant life or death to them. And if their teammates weren't showing that hunger to win, then the duo would certainly make that point clear, too. Every team needs that guy who can't simply afford to lose, whether on the field or, as Revolution teammate Steve Ralston noted after Heaps' retirement ceremony Wednesday, at ping-pong on the Wii. 4. A lightning rod for opposing fans. The relentlessness may have endeared Heaps and Olsen to teammates and those who cheered for the Revolution and United, but the constant cajoling and competing made them persona non grata for opposing supporters. Instigate some disapproval among the masses usually means you're doing your job well. 5. A touchstone for those around them. The contributions didn't stop on the field as the duo were key contributors in the locker room and in the community. Teammates, staffers, media members, fans, it never seemed to matter. There was always a moment to talk or an instant to take a photograph. Olsen, a licensed minister, even officiated at Nick Rimando's wedding back in the day. Talk about versatility.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Casting Pearls night Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casting Pearls night Captain
|
Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 6:17 pm
Quote: McCarthy’s Musings: The Friday Five Examines Donovan’s New Galaxy DealBy Kyle McCarthy Landon Donovan may be headed to England in January, but it looks like his long-term future remains in Los Angeles. Donovan signed a four-year contract extension with MLS and the Galaxy on Wednesday. The reported $9 million pact represents the most lucrative deal for an American player in MLS by quite some distance and makes Donovan the second-highest paid player in the American top flight behind Galaxy teammate David Beckham. What impact will Donovan's new deal have on MLS, its salary structure and its players? The Friday Five examines the possible fallout from Donovan's record-breaking deal. 1. Donovan is “a special player.” That exact phrase came up twice as I gauged reaction about the deal yesterday. Given the context and the player in question, it's hard to quibble with its usage. Considering his performances on the field and his unique value to MLS, Donovan certainly deserves a pay packet in this price range. This is the perfect agreement for a player who wants to stay in MLS and for a league that wants and needs to keep him here. The lingering question is whether MLS will see this deal as a one-time exception for a special player in a unique set of circumstances or as a brief to raise the level of compensation for other domestic standouts. 2. The timing…well, it's a bit curious. For Donovan, the timing makes perfect sense. Why not take a big raise and a guarantee to have the flexibility to go away on loan? From the league's perspective, it is logical to keep Donovan happy and satisfied while demonstrating his commitment to MLS ahead of a Premier League loan deal and the World Cup, but it doesn't quite compute to give any player, even a vitally important one like Donovan, a massive deal six weeks before the expiration of the Collective Bargaining Agreement. Make no mistake: this deal raises the bar for other players around MLS at a time when the league is trying fix its costs in the new CBA. Odd time to flash the cash then, isn't it? 3. How, if at all, will the Donovan deal impact the CBA negotiations? The relatively compressed pay scale for Americans has now widened considerably with Donovan now slated to make approximately $2.25 million per season, according to Sports Illustrated's Grant Wahl. All of a sudden, the top American players around MLS – perhaps Stuart Holden, who just elicited a bumper contract offer that now represents approximately one-seventh of Donovan's yearly haul, will be the trail blazer – are going to start to wonder why their contract number isn't even in the same zip code as Donovan's take. Will those players possess enough sway or enough European interest to drag their wages up to a level they might feel is more appropriate? The circumstances - Donovan's unique importance and MLS' bargaining power in CBA negotiations, to name two - suggest that it may not happen as quickly as the players think it should after this deal. 4. The price for new Designated Players just rose significantly. European agents will absolutely have a field day with Donovan's new deal. After all, why should a player with impeccable credentials in the world game accept a discount when MLS is willing to shell out big bucks to someone not named Blanco or Beckham? Maybe MLS can still weasel its way into a discount or two because some potential DP targets love the idea of playing in America, but it'll be a tough sell when Donovan, who hasn't excelled overseas despite his stellar body of work Stateside, is on such an enormous chunk of change. 5. Goodbye, grandfather clause? Maybe it's just wishful thinking, but the magnitude of Donovan's new deal should hasten the end to the one lingering exception to the Designated Player rule. Donovan is the only player in MLS who makes DP money, but is not counted as a DP because he – along with the since departed Eddie Johnson and Carlos Ruiz – earned a DP-level deal before the rule's inception prior to the 2007 season. The Galaxy, to the best of my knowledge after writing a story on Donovan's situation in November 2007, picks up the tab as if Donovan was a DP without actually counting him as such. Donovan's presence as a non-DP player on DP money gives the Galaxy a significant competitive advantage. How many teams can find a player that will contribute as much on and off the field as Donovan does for a cap hit equal to that of a second Designated Player? One further point to ponder: when AEG head honcho Tim Leiweke chatted with The Observer about possible changes to the DP rule in November, he suggested that a possible rule alteration would increase the number of available DP slots to three per team. In the context of the Donovan deal, it would make ample sense to hand each club two native DP slots and permit them to go out and acquire a third. In such a hypothetical situation, Beckham and Donovan would take up the Galaxy's two DP slots, while the Galaxy could sweet talk some team into conceding an extra slot to collect its third. Sounds like a win-win for everyone, even if it wouldn't do as much as it should to restore the competitive balance thrown askew when L.A. didn't have to pay the piper to acquire a DP slot for Donovan in the first place. BONUS. Does this shatter the DP ceiling for MLS-reared American players? Donovan's contract upgrade opens MLS up to another question it may not want to answer: why can't other American players who developed in MLS earn DP dollars?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 25, 2009 4:19 pm
Quote: McCarthy’s Musings: The Friday Five Delivers Its Christmas List
By Kyle McCarthy Christmas is all about giving unto others, right? In that spirit, the Friday Five is putting its personal wishes to the side – though if you're willing to purchase that long-desired first-class trip around the world for the TFF, by all means – and focusing on the needs of the greater American soccer community. 2009 offered plenty of gifts for the American soccer fan, all things considered. World Cup qualification and a surprising run to the Confederations Cup final for the U.S. men's national team. The continued development of MLS on and off the field, with a special tip of the hat to the stellar expansion success in Seattle. The emergence of a special class of MLS rookies. The debut of WPS. The impressive dominance of the U.S. women's national team under Pia Sundhage. To cap it all off, Los Angeles finally managed to include David Beckham in a team that didn't stink. Despite all of those positives, there is still room under the tree for a gift or two heading into 2010 and the Friday Five is more than willing to suggest a few possible options. If you have additional hopes and dreams, feel free to comment below. 1. Labor peace in MLS. Nothing is more important than finding some common ground between MLS and its Players Union. If there's one thing MLS can't afford, it's a lockout that impacts the start of its season. Fortunately for those of us who follow the league, both sides are well aware of that fact. Push the troubling rumblings from the Union and its players to the side for now and hope both sides strike the deal they need to strike as close to Jan. 31 as possible. 2. One potential star from the six young foreign players that inked MLS deals this week. Los Angeles signed three Brazilians on loan from Sao Paulo, while MLS is apparently in the process of distributing three young Colombians to teams across the league through the discovery process. If one of these players even approaches the impact Fredy Montero – admittedly a far more accomplished player upon his arrival than any of these prospects – made in his first season, MLS will continue to increase the level of play and keep its bottom line healthy by developing and selling foreign talent overseas. 3. An influx of younger talent in January's MLS SuperDraft. By most accounts, this year's crop won't match the bumper group that arrived on the scene this year. Even with that caveat in mind, there are some players in this class that can have an impact straight away. We'll know more after the SuperDraft Combine on Jan. 9-12 – I'll be there to run the rule over the chosen few and get a feel for the players I don't get to see much, if at all, during the college season – but the addition of a few more dependable players would only build on the base of youthful talent already in the fold. 4. Increased resources to develop refereeing at the ground level. MLS coaches, fans, front office staffers, media members and players scream incessantly about the need for better refereeing. If this season is any indication, the standard simply isn't where it needs to be, even if it may represent an improvement from years past. In order to cultivate better referees with more feel for the game, USSF needs to start at the grassroots level by spending the money to nurture new referees who have played the game at a decent level, identify talented prospects and push them through the system. By devoting more resources and instituting better development initiatives, the USSF can discover the next generation of referees and stock a league that will need a deeper referee pool as it continues to expand. 5. A unified second division. At this point, it doesn't particularly matter how USSF sorts out the mess between NASL and USL. Sure, the NASL has a point about its lack of autonomy and growth under the former USL leadership and the USL didn't do itself any favors with the shady circumstances surrounding its sale, but that is irrelevant right now. American soccer needs a reasonably stable second division in 2010; it's up to USSF to sort out the unholy disaster and get almost everyone on the same page sooner rather than later. BONUS. A little help for WPS. It's a long, hard and necessary slog for women's professional soccer in the United States. Here's hoping the WPS can find a way to build on its opening season and figure out an approach to beat the odds and make the balance sheet work for the long-term.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Casting Pearls night Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casting Pearls night Captain
|
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 6:32 pm
Quote: McCarthy's Musings: Survival And Growth Dominate Decade In MLSDec 30, 2009 By Kyle McCarthy Seven years ago, MLS teetered on the precipice of failure. Losses accumulated with each passing day as teams struggled with bad venue contracts and poor auxiliary revenue sources. Red ink flowed profusely and black ink represented a distant dream. A federal court in Boston held the structural existence of the league in its hands. Flailing teams in Miami and Tampa folded, the victims of shoddy ownership and no ownership at all, respectively. At that point, the future looked murky at best. The worst, well, it's not even worth contemplating even in hindsight. Contraction marked the bottom for MLS in this (and probably any other) decade when it struck on Jan. 8, 2002. The galling action dealt MLS a crippling blow, but it also permitted league executives to plan for a brighter future. Slowly, but surely, MLS crawled out of its nadir. Three particularly committed investors – Philip Anschutz, Lamar Hunt and Robert Kraft – carried MLS when others ducked out or shunned the league. Instead of folding up shop and writing off the massive losses, Anschutz, Hunt and Kraft carried the league and transformed it into a viable investment opportunity for others. Contraction certainly helped, removing two of the league's weakest markets and curbing some losses in the process. So too did the First Circuit's decision in Fraser v. Major League Soccer, which allowed MLS to keep its single-entity structure in tact, limited player personnel costs and ensured the inaugural Collective Bargaining Agreement talks would produce a management-friendly pact. Most of all, the future brightened because the infrastructure improved. Oversized NFL stadiums were gradually replaced in many markets by intimate, soccer-specific facilities. These stadiums eliminated the tenant sinkhole and broadened revenue streams for many teams. Profit, for the first time in league history, looked like more than just a distant objective on a piece of paper. Hope inspired investment on multiple fronts. The improved financial landscape attracted a diverse group of investors willing to share the burden and ameliorate the losses. Sponsors were more willing to sign larger deals. ESPN and Fox Soccer Channel stumped up rights fees. Profits were still hard to find, but a couple of teams started to function in the black rather than the red. Financial progress allowed MLS to push the boundaries of financial conservatism. Key players were handed deals above the salary cap in order to keep them in the fold. Expansion strengthened the league with integral markets in Seattle and Toronto now involved while relocation brought Houston into the fold. With the player pool stretched, MLS petitioned for more foreign player spots and devised a rule that could bring the brightest stars in world football to the United States. David Beckham's arrival in 2007 signaled MLS' intent to make a splash and turn away from the cost control measures. As the next decade begins, MLS remains a unique entity on the world landscape. The quality of play continues to improve, though considerable strides need to be made on the field and in the wage packets before MLS joins the upper echelons of club football. A liberalized form of the single-entity structure – certain functions have devolved to individual clubs, while others remain under the auspices of the central office – ensures reasonable cost control even in the face of a CBA certain to increase those costs in some manner. Even with the single-entity structures in place, fissures have started to appear between large market and small market clubs as MLS plots its new trajectory. Failure, however, simply isn't an option anymore. After an often tumultuous ten-year period in which the pendulum swung between the dual objectives of survival and growth, that's one point worth lauding as the next decade begins.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 6:34 pm
Quote: McCarthy's Musings: The Friday Five Reflects On The Past Decade In MLSJan 1, 2010 By Kyle McCarthy The end of a decade invites introspection. It also brings a cavalcade of lists chronicling the exploits of the previous year and the nine that came before that. Lists are a regular occurrence in the Friday Five – one to five really doesn't lend itself to any other appellation after all – so it's only fitting to reflect on the past decade on the first day of the new one. Instead of focusing on the best players and the best moments on the field, the Friday Five picks up where the Musings left off on Wednesday. This list isn't about the players who captivated us, but the off-the-field moments that have influenced the development of a still-nascent league. There are too many moments to mention in such a limited rundown. Suffice it to say that there were more than a few worthy candidates and there are certainly many more than could be mentioned here. In the end, the selected moments were the most significant – at least in this author's eyes – for the trends they represented and started and for their impact on the league, its players and its finances. Honorable Mention: 2000 – MLS ditches shootouts, switches to running time; 2002 – U.S. national team reaches quarterfinals of World Cup with 11 MLS players on its roster; 2003 – MLS sells Tim Howard to Manchester United for $4 million; 2004 – MLS ends overtime in regular season matches; mid-decade – MLS signs Landon Donovan, Eddie Johnson and Carlos Ruiz to contracts greater than the designated maximum salary; 2005 – MLS All-Star Game permanently switches to the current All-Stars vs. club format; 2006 – Toronto awarded first Canadian franchise; 2008 – MLS sells Jozy Altidore to Villarreal for $10 million; 2008 – MLS deputy commissioner Ivan Gazidis named chief executive of Arsenal; 2009 – Landon Donovan inks a lucrative four-year contract extension. 5. 2004 – MLS, adidas sign 10-year, $150-million sponsorship deal. This deal blew the doors off of every previous sponsorship deal signed by the league. The $150-million price tag raised eyebrows, but the length of the agreement represented a significant coup considering the financial troubles early in the decade. The high-profile partnership with a prominent worldwide vendor also provided a tangible sign that the recovery and the eventual growth on the financial side of the ledger had commenced. 4. 2002 – First Circuit upholds MLS' single-entity structure in Fraser / 2004 – MLS, Players Union agree to first Collective Bargaining Agreement. The First Circuit held the fate of MLS' single-entity structure in its hands after the plaintiffs in Fraser v. Major League Soccer appealed a District Court ruling out of Boston that upheld it. The challenge failed again in the higher court, ensuring MLS could keep its single-entity and dictate the terms in the resulting CBA negotiations. The players are now furious with the cost and movement controls included in the pact, but the management-friendly deal played an important part in the league's growth during the decade by limiting overhead. MLS' willingness to back off some of the more restrictive provisions of that deal in the new CBA agreement will dictate how the next decade begins. 3. 2006 – MLS Board of Governors passes Designated Player rule / 2007 – LA Galaxy signs David Beckham. This move was the natural extension of the exemptions granted to Donovan, Ruiz and Johnson earlier in the decade. Credit AEG head honcho Tim Leiweke for dreaming big and persuading the Board of Governors to depart from the staunch financial conservatism that had carried the league through its darkest days. Once the Board of Governors passed the DP rule in November 2006, Leiweke made sure the new rule yielded dividends by luring Beckham to the United States on a five-year deal shortly after the new year. Say what you want about Beckham's up and down tenure in Los Angeles, but his presence in the league and his popularity around the world have raised MLS' profile immeasurably and lined MLS' pockets substantially since he first stepped foot on the Home Depot Center pitch in the summer of 2007. The combination of the DP rule and Beckham's arrival represents the biggest coup in league history. 2. 2002 – MLS contracts Miami and Tampa Bay. Investor/operator problems at both Florida clubs backed MLS into an untenable position early in the decade. Miami had an unwilling investor/operator in former cell phone magnate Ken Horowitz, while Tampa couldn't find an investor/operator despite a protracted courtship with Tampa Bay Buccaneers (and soon-to-be Manchester United) owner Malcolm Glazer. The financial losses were too great for MLS to maintain operations in Tampa, so both clubs were wound up and the players were dispersed to the remaining ten clubs through an allocation process and a dispersal draft. The embarrassing failure may have plunged MLS into uncertainty, but the removal of two monetary sinkholes shored up the bottom line and laid the foundation for the eventual growth of the league. 1 .2000-present – Soccer-specific stadiums appear across the United States. Lamar Hunt started the transition to owner-controlled, revenue-generating and fan-friendly venues when he opened Crew Stadium in 1999. Other investor/operators took careful note of the positives – increased ancillary revenue streams from outside events and improved fan atmosphere for MLS matches to name but two – and jumped on the bandwagon. Six soccer-specific stadiums joined Crew Stadium among the ranks of MLS venues in the past decade, significantly smoothing the road to profitability across the league and establishing the permanent infrastructure required for the long haul.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Casting Pearls night Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casting Pearls night Captain
|
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 6:20 pm
Quote: McCarthy's Musings: Central Scouting Service Would Ease Burden On MLS Clubs Evaluating college talent is hard work for coaches and technical directors. A central scouting service similar to the one maintained by the NHL would ease the burden and improve the process, writes Kyle McCarthy.Jan 6, 2010 Scouting college players isn't as simple as it should be for MLS clubs. Timing plays a factor in making things considerably more complicated. The college season dovetails with the vital fixtures of the MLS regular season, forcing most of the scouting responsibilities onto assistant coaches and limiting the amount of time any member of the technical staff can spend planning for the future without detracting from the week's preparations. When coaches squeeze the required scouting excursions into the schedule, minuscule budgets and the aforementioned time constraints generally restrict the missions to local and regional ventures to watch regular season games, selected post-season conference tournaments and carefully chosen NCAA tournament games. In addition to in-person scouting, coaches wade through endless reels of game tape culled from college matches across the country. The current system places significant and disproportionate emphasis on important events – the ACC tournament, the Final Four and the MLS Player Combine – and favors some clubs over others simply by virtue of their geographic location and by their willingness to expend extra dollars on a technical director or a scouting position. While some clubs have worked the grapevine of college coaches in order to procure recommendations and mined talent regardless of the restrictions, the current ad hoc method can only prove so effective across the board. Most players are caught by the system, but some inevitably slip through the cracks. Scouting talent doesn't have to be this difficult or this haphazard. MLS can improve the process substantially by borrowing from the NHL and instituting a central scouting service to help evaluate talent for the SuperDraft. The concept is just as simple as it sounds. The NHL started its central scouting service in 1975 to serve its member clubs. Twenty-nine scouts – including eight full-time staffers and fifteen part-timers just to cover the U.S. and Canada – blanket North America and Europe and search for NHL prospects wherever they can be found. The service grades prospects on publicly-available criteria and issues two player ranking lists during the season. In addition to its player evaluation services, the central scouting service also offers weekly injury updates, supplies teams with game tapes and invites 100 top prospects to Toronto for medical and fitness testing. A scaled-down version of the NHL's central scouting service would enhance the evaluation process considerably by improving the flow of information and rounding out the scouting procedures undertaken by the clubs. Often ignored areas – high-level youth club tournaments, non-DI colleges and smaller DI conferences – could receive more thorough inspection in the hopes of finding a player or two who might slip through the cracks. At the very least, the service could facilitate more opportunities to obtain knowledge about out-of-region major college players, provide different perspectives on the notable prospects already on the radar and build a bridge to younger talent until clubs can start to reap more consistent rewards from the academy initiatives adopted over the past few years. As an additional bonus for a league trying to generate buzz around its draft process, a central service would provide ample debate fodder. By judging and ranking talent and posting its lists to its Web site, the NHL central scouting service starts the discussion on the annual entry draft. Once the rankings are released, the general media disseminates them to a wider audience. A few independent sources do similar work in MLS – Buzz Carrick's 3rdDegree.net and Joe Mauceri's Pro Player Pipeline are the most thorough – but the current cottage industry could earn a wider audience with a MLS-branded initiative. Despite the apparent positives for a thorough, centralized scouting service, there are certain drawbacks that might preclude its creation. Chief among them is the significant cost involved to adequately staff and supply a service primarily used as a secondary source. Spending the required amount of money on a central scouting service would almost certainly require financial cuts in other player-related areas, an exchange that MLS may not deem cost-effective. There is also the significant question of whether any expenditure is merited considering the small rosters and the correspondingly brief four-round SuperDraft. The bulk of the scouting money would go toward improving the accuracy of third- and fourth-round draft picks, an area in which teams have experienced relative success over the years. While those factors certainly build a substantial case against the concept, the institution of a central scouting service would provide benefits that exceed the significant financial considerations involved. A league-sponsored initiative would reduce the disparities between clubs and increase the flow of information in an area in which good intelligence is hard to accumulate. A central scouting service wouldn't supply all of the answers, but it would hand each club a valuable tool to aid in player evaluation. Most of all, it might make life just a little bit simpler for coaches and personnel men around the league. After all, isn't wading through an arcane player acquisition system, developing the players already in the side and trying to win enough games to stay employed a hard enough task without trying to scout every potential professional player across the country on a meager budget?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 6:22 pm
Quote: McCarthy's Musings: The Friday Five Previews the MLS Player Combine The MLS Player Combine starts tomorrow, so the Friday Five is here to take a brief look at what to expect from the proceedings.Jan 8, 2010 FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. – For a selected group of MLS hopefuls, the time to impress has arrived. A host of college stars, plus a handful of U.S. youth internationals who have inked Generation adidas deals, will filter into South Florida today to take physicals and undergo testing prior to the start of the MLS Player Combine tomorrow. Four teams will take the field tomorrow afternoon for the first of three doubleheaders in four days at Central Broward Regional Park. MLS coaches and executives will run the rule over the professional aspirants tomorrow, Sunday and Tuesday and evaluate the prospects one last time before the MLS SuperDraft next Thursday in Philadelphia. There will be plenty of coverage of the events over the next few days – monitor the Twitter feed (@kylejmccarthy) for instant updates and check back for notebooks over the weekend and the Monday MLS Breakdown for in-depth analysis – so the Friday Five is going to keep it general as it casts its eye over what is to come over the next four days. 1. Forget about the Beautiful Game...at least on the opening day. The conditions aren't ripe for eye-catching fare. Players battle their nerves and ponder how the influential spectators are assessing their play. Coaches field a team with little collective preparation and manage deployments carefully to showcase every player, often in different positions from game-to-game and half-to-half. Add in the compressed schedule and the result is a complement of games that doesn't always correlate with the quality one might expect from a congregation of the top college talent in the U.S. 2. Fitness matters. The college season ended over a month ago for players from the four teams who made it to the Final Four. Others have cooled their heels for eight or nine weeks, depending on team performance. The onus falls on each player to keep fit without high-level match practice during the lengthy lag time. Most players take that task seriously and work through the kinks of returning to a decent standard of play sooner rather than later, while others are left to rue the skipped workouts and the holiday buffets in the second or third match of the combine. Coaches can fix poor fitness, but players won't perform to the best of their abilities without it and could see their draft status slip in some circumstances. 3. Stocks will rise and fall, particularly if the player is a relative unknown. Careers might not be made and broken in three doubleheaders in Fort Lauderdale, but they can certainly be impacted. A good performance can send a player shooting up the draft board, while the inverse would have the opposite effect. One look at last year's SuperDraft shows the influence a good camp (Ryan Maxwell from off the charts to the first round) or a bad weekend (Yohance Marshall from first-round buzz to undrafted) can have on a prospect. 4. Weigh the words carefully...and then discard them. Subterfuge works best in war and professional sports drafts. Many coaches and executives will say nothing, few will say something without saying anything and next to no one will say something that means something. The pre-SuperDraft buzz is about entertainment and misdirection, not hard information. 5. Remember the Combine is just one piece of the SuperDraft puzzle. As mentioned in Wednesday's column, the Combine may be an important part of evaluating players prior to the SuperDraft, but it is not the only factor. Scouting takes place during the regular season, the major conference tournaments and the NCAA tournament. While lesser-known players may feel more pressure to perform on this stage, players with a strong body of work in an accessible geographical area or a often-scouted major conference can rest easy knowing that a so-so showing at the Combine may not submarine their draft standing.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Casting Pearls night Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casting Pearls night Captain
|
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 4:06 pm
Quote: MLS SuperDraft: Constructing the Draft Board As MLS teams hunker down and tweak their draft boards ahead of tomorrow's SuperDraft, Kyle McCarthy reveals his own version to help preview the proceedings.Jan 13, 2010 By Kyle McCarthy FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. – Forming a list of players to draft seems like a relatively straightforward task. In the abstract, the steps aren't difficult to discern. Watch as many live matches as possible and supplement those matches with a bunch of games on tape. Obtain additional information from trusted confidants with pertinent knowledge. Assess the final evidence provided by the MLS Player Combine. Compile a list of the best players, cross them off one-by-one until your turn comes up and select the best player available. Rinse, lather and repeat year after year. Reality, as one might expect, is considerably more complicated. The list of factors that actually impacts the player evaluation process – personal preferences in terms of playing style, projected tactics, personality types and team needs to name just four – is too expansive to boil down to one sentence. The permutations increase substantially when external factors – trades and unforeseen departures from the expected selections, for example – are weighed. An apparently simple process turns hopelessly complicated in short order. Fortunately the purposes of this draft board, those complicated factors aren't in play. This list meshes the personal observations divined from the Combine with other data accumulated along the way to serve as a rough guide to how the SuperDraft could unfold. * – Denotes foreign player who would require an international slot The Chosen Three1. Danny Mwanga, Oregon State forward (Generation adidas)* 2. Ike Opara, Wake Forest defender (Generation adidas) 3. Tony Tchani, Virginia midfielder (Generation adidas) This trio has separated itself from the remainder of the class. All three players are prime prospects, so the difference on this board primarily comes down to the difficulty of finding a similarly effective player at that position on the field. New York or San Jose would be hard pressed to opt out of selecting either Opara or Tchani, even if the whispers about Opara returning to school to finish out his degree are true. The Big Talents With One Glaring Flaw4. Corben Bone, Wake Forest midfielder (Generation adidas) 5. Teal Bunbury, Akron forward (Generation adidas) Bone faces questions about his size and its impact on where he'll fit on the field, while Bunbury can't shake concerns about his finishing prowess. The Wake schemer earns the slight edge here because his passing ability is rarer than Bunbury's speed. Footballers6. Zach Loyd, North Carolina midfielder 7. Toni Stahl, UConn midfielder* 8. Blair Gavin, Akron midfielder (Generation adidas) Others might have more flash or more potential, but these three guys know what to do when you put them on the field. Loyd holds the edge because he can play in a number of spots, a distinct advantage in his favor when clubs are heading into battle with rosters the size of a postage stamp. All About Upside9. Amobi Okugo, UCLA midfielder (Generation adidas) 10. Dilly Duka, Rutgers midfielder Picking either of these players is like prospecting for gold. The chances are hit or miss and there isn't likely to be much middle ground in between. Okugo's age (18 ) and athleticism (off the charts) could tempt some club to grab him higher, but his nascent positional sense places him behind players with lower ceilings on this board. Two Examples Why MLS Coaches and Executives Scout Players Before the Combine11. Andre Akpan, Harvard forward 12. Andrew Wiedeman, California forward (Generation adidas) Both players are proceeding through the process of forgetting all about their underwhelming Combine performances and hoping most clubs will follow suit. The lackluster trip to Florida may plunge them further down the draft board than they might have anticipated, but the body of work on the whole – plus Wiedeman's status as a roster-exempt player – means they shouldn't slide too far. (Fun fact: If Akpan is in fact selected in the first round of the SuperDraft, he would become the first Ivy League player to see his name come off the board in the opening set of picks.) Just in Case a Defender is Required13. Kwame Watson-Siriboe, UConn defender Prototypical size, decent feet, nice coverage ability. What more do you want from a bottom of the first round central defender? When All Things Are Equal, Choose a Wake Kid14. Zack Schilawski, Wake Forest forward 15. Austin da Luz, Wake Forest midfielder Demon Deacons coach Jay Vidovich churns out useful professionals year after year. Schilawski and da Luz fit the mold perfectly: smart players who can fill a role and contribute to the squad. The Combine Surprise16. Justin Morrow, Notre Dame defender MLS coaches and executives love to throw curveballs in the back half of the first round. Usually, it's an unheralded player who played out of his skin at the Combine or a hidden gem that piqued the interest of a club when no one else was looking. Morrow is the best candidate from this year's Combine for three reasons: (1) he plays left back, a general position of need, (2) he can run all day and (3) he has upside because he only played defense for one year in college. The Type of Player Teams Love to See in the Second Round17. Collen Warner, Portland midfielder He can step in and compete for a spot right away. Warner may not drop into the starting XI, but he makes practices better because he's a reserve option who can pass the ball, run at defenders and occasionally provide the telling cross. Salcedo Tutelage Mandatory, Defensive Commitment and Size Optional18. Michael Stephens, UCLA midfielder 19. David Estrada, UCLA midfielder 20. Kyle Nakazawa, UCLA midfielder Stephens is the best player out of the three and could easily rate a few spots higher on a team's draft board if a club is looking for a different wide option or a reserve central midfielder with good vision. All three players are tidy enough with the ball at their feet, but can they shoulder the defensive responsibilities required as an outside midfielder? What Ever Happened to the Reserve League, Anyways?21. Jack McInerney, U.S. U-17 forward (Generation adidas) The tools are there, if the Combine is a reliable indicator. However, it's going to take a significant amount of time for him to develop into an impact player in the attacking third at the MLS level. Even When It's Chilly, South Florida is Worth the Trip22. Drew Yates, Maryland midfielder 23. Mike Seamon, Villanova midfielder Not a lot of buzz about either player heading into the Combine, but that changed as the weekend progressed. Both players possess decent size and showed particularly well on the weekend, though one has to wonder if the dreaded tweener tag might doom them to the second half of the draft. Harvard defender Kwaku Nyamekye might also fit here, but his Swiss citizenship means he'd take up a foreign slot that would probably be better used elsewhere. Remember the Good Old Days?24. Ofori Sarkodie, Indiana fullback Didn't have the best of Combines, but two things work in his favor: (1) he plays left back and (2) someone might take a flier based on his days as a U-17 international. The Token Goalkeeper25. Brian Perk, UCLA goalkeeper (Generation adidas) Need a goalkeeper? Look elsewhere. Perk's a decent choice even though he appears to have reached his ceiling, but, as a general rule, this crop of keepers won't provide many options or much comfort for clubs in search of a backup stopper.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 4:09 pm
Quote: MLS SuperDraft: Pre-Draft Swap Meet Yields Results All of the movers and shakers descended on the hotel bar keeping the lines of communication open for possible deals. Kyle McCarthy surveyed the scene and cobbled together a few tidbits.Jan 14, 2010 By Kyle McCarthy PHILADELPHIA – The night before the MLS SuperDraft never fails to entertain. Nearly every pertinent decision maker congregates in the hotel bar and many stay until shortly before last call. Some have a few beverages, chat with friends and survey the room. Others huddle together in isolated nooks and crannies to discuss possible trades. Everyone exchanges a mixture of truths, half-truths and outright lies while trying to find a handle on how the SuperDraft will unfold. Although the bar scene always captivates, the day and the night before the SuperDraft doesn't always produce tangible results. That wasn't the case yesterday as D.C. United and Philadelphia pulled off a major trade around dinner time, while at least one trade went down at the bar during the evening. Here are few of the talking points that emerged over the last 24 hours: – D.C. United solved its goalkeeping crisis by acquiring the rights to Troy Perkins from Philadelphia in exchange for Fred, the seventh overall pick and an undisclosed amount of allocation money. In order to consummate the deal, the Union vacated its perch in the top spot in the allocation order to secure Perkins' rights as an American international player returning to MLS. Perkins had spent the past two seasons playing with Valerenga (Norway), but recently signed a deal to return to MLS. At first blush, it looks like Philly fleeced United. The Union acquired a probable starter – perhaps even in the number ten role where the Brazilian thrived during his time in Australia – and ensured a shot to select a possible young contributor. United even threw in money to defray the cost of Fred's hefty $225,000 base salary. No matter how you look at it, this is a fine return on a minimal outlay for the Union. A deeper look indicates D.C. may not have conceded as much as one might suspect. Fred struggled through most of 2009 and ended the season as a spot starter rather than a dead certain first XI choice. His status as a D.C. player for 2010 remained uncertain even though United had committed to bringing him back and this move shows he was clearly expendable in the right deal. Viewed in a different light, this package constitutes a salary dump by United to clear more cap room with the draft pick as the focus of the swap. The pick appears valuable externally, but its value diminishes to United internally if the projected options didn't impress the D.C. brass. The allocation money merely represents the cost of doing business to include Fred in the deal and allow the Union to absorb his salary. It's also worth noting that United boasts a significant amount of cap room and can afford to pay Perkins a salary – mooted in this space on Tuesday as a deal considerably higher than $200,000 per season – well in excess of his true MLS value. Two factors will ultimately determine how this deal is viewed in the future: (1) the performance of the Union's newly acquired draft pick and (2) Perkins' ability to solidify the transient United goalkeeping situation and provide value for his hefty salary. For now, the edge goes to the Union for acquiring a potential starter and a first-round draft pick without subtracting from its roster or its financial resources, but United didn't fare as poorly as many seem to believe. - New England and New York have agreed to a trade that will send a Revolution player to the Red Bulls in exchange for two draft picks, according to sources familiar with the deal. The exchange is awaiting final approval by the league and will not include any of the Red Bulls' first three draft picks (2nd, 14th and 18th overall). (writer's note, 10:45a.m.: Didn't mean to deprive you of the 14th overall pick, NYRB - just glanced at an old draft list. The two picks, by the way, are the 31st and the 48th.) - Real Salt Lake has rejected a transfer offer from River Plate (Argentina) for centerback Jamison Olave, RSL general manager Garth Lagerwey told the Keepin' It Real blog yesterday. - Former Colorado, Tampa and New England goalkeeper Adin Brown said yesterday he is strongly considering retirement after fighting an Achilles injury for the past year and a half. Brown spent five years with Aalesund (Norway), but he was released by the club at the end of 2009. Brown is in Philly for the NSCAA coaches' convention and plans to pursue possible options as an assistant coach at the college level. - Goal.com is planning to run a live chat during the SuperDraft. J.R. Eskilson will do the heavy lifting and share all of his college soccer insights as the picks come down, while Shane Evans, Greg Lalas and yours truly will check in from time to time as we work the floor at the Pennsylvania Convention Center. Questions and Answers (In the spirit of interactivity, I'll pick out a few choice questions each day during draft week and answer them in this space. Get in the game by following along on Twitter – @kylejmccarthy – or dropping me a line via e-mail.) this [the Perkins deal] puts NY at #1 in the allocation order. NY-Dallas trade in the works?@Jimmy_Jeans, via Twitter It certainly would make sense. FCD wants to sign Lee Nguyen from HAGL (Vietnam), but the Hoops will need an allocation to complete the deal because Nguyen has appeared for the U.S. national team. New York could pick up allocation money to help its pursuit of high-priced talent and may even also express some interest in bringing Dave van den Bergh back to the Red Bulls after the FCD midfielder told Soccer by Ives earlier this week that he wanted to return to the club. How did Steven Kinney do at the MLS Combine? Do you think he will get drafted?Mike, via e-mail Kinney, a centerback out of Elon, performed well enough at the Combine to earn consideration as a possible draftee. He scored a diving header in his first game and performed steadily, if not spectacularly, throughout the weekend. The big concern for him at the next level is whether he can defend one-vs-one against MLS-caliber forwards. This isn't a particularly strong crop of central defenders, so Kinney should come off the board at some point during the third or fourth round. Does any team have as bad of a history with the draft as Colorado does? I am looking over past drafts & am in shock!@iamtheawesome, via Twitter It all depends on when the Rapids are on the clock. Colorado has consistently struggled to find the right players in the first round, but has shown an ability to pick up talent – Omar Cummings and Nick LaBrocca, to name two examples – in the later rounds. All things considered, it's probably for the best that the Rapids won't join the fray until the 22nd pick.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Casting Pearls night Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casting Pearls night Captain
|
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 4:16 pm
Quote: The Friday Five Reviews The MLS SuperDraft In a SuperDraft filled with trades and surprises, Philadelphia emerged as the biggest winner on and off the board. Kyle McCarthy explains why the Union enjoyed so much success and reviews all of the action in the Friday Five.Jan 15, 2010 By Kyle McCarthy PHILADELPHIA – Forget about the other fifteen teams. The 2010 MLS SuperDraft was all about Philadelphia and the hosts didn't disappoint. If the Union's first forays onto the field are as successful as its first venture into the SuperDraft, then the Sons of Ben will have plenty to cheer about during the inaugural season. The local fans added atmosphere to an event that has occasionally lacked it in the past, though a tip of the hat has to go to the traveling fans from New York and Washington who made the short trek to support their teams. The local club invigorated the proceedings by accumulating three first-round picks after striking two deals within a 24-hour stretch. To cap it all off, the Union selected one of the most comprehensive draft classes in recent memory by using its draft-high six picks to compile an assortment of ready-made contributors and future projects. The perfect storm of circumstances resulted in one massive win for MLS' newest franchise. The Friday Five reviews a few of the key victories and defeats that emerged during the SuperDraft, starting with the Union's bold moves to stockpile all of those first-round picks. 1. No established team could have or would have pulled off the moves Philadelphia made. As an expansion team, the Union benefits from two things most teams don't possess: flexibility and available resources. The most important resource for the two deals – a straight cash swap with FC Dallas for the sixth pick and a pact to assume Fred and his hefty salary in exchange for D.C. United's seventh selection – is the treasure trove of allocation money Philly inherited when it entered the league. Union manager Peter Nowak and assistant John Hackworth used their allocation dollars wisely to acquire two young and raw players – Amobi Okugo and Jack McInerney – who will likely make an impact a year or three down the line. Most teams can't afford to wait on an 18-year-old and a 17-year-old and they certainly can't afford to expend significant resources on two relative gambles. The Union can and benefited significantly from its ability to do so. 2. Ike Opara really is serious about heading back to Wake Forest and postponing the start of his rookie year. Opara, a communications major, had a clause inserted into his Generation adidas contract that allows him to attend school at Wake Forest this semester and postpone the beginning of his MLS career. Opara said yesterday that he has already enrolled in classes at Wake and said the plan now is to join San Jose in late April or early May. “I'd be really close to (my degree),” said Opara, who left Wake after his junior season. “My parents are very highly educated individuals. My dad's in biochemical research and my mom is in the public school system. They really stress school. I wanted to do this because I really wanted to go pro. They worked out an option so I could do my spring semester. It's a pleasure. I feel really honored to do something like this.” 3. Corben Bone's stock fell because teams simply weren't sure where to play him. No player fell more surprisingly than Bone, the Wake Forest playmaker who almost everyone had as one of the top five players in the draft. Once FC Dallas passed on the Plano, Tex. native with the fifth pick, Bone's bottom fell out because most teams expected him to be off the board and had other players in mind. Bone slid all the way to a particularly grateful Chicago at 13. After talking to several people about why Bone dropped so precipitously, the general consensus coalesced around the fact that his projected position, not his ample talent, was the problem. In order to have Bone on the field, teams would have to create a tactical plan that would allow him some freedom from defensive responsibilities and plenty of time on the ball. Most teams aren't willing to do that and more than a few didn't see a spot for Bone as a true central midfielder, striker or winger. Ironically, the slide may have helped Bone in the end because he now joins a Fire side with plenty of experience in dealing with an offensive talent that needs plenty of room to roam in Cuauhtemoc Blanco. 4. Clint Mathis' road back to Los Angeles started with a simple request. Mathis wanted to move his family closer to his wife's family in the Los Angeles area. Real Salt Lake general manager Garth Lagerwey said the Claret-and-Cobalt wanted to accommodate Mathis' request if it could. RSL eventually struck a pick swap with Los Angeles at the bottom of the first round once it became clear that Portland midfielder Collen Warner would be available with the 15th pick and included Mathis in the deal. “One of the things we have espoused to the level of getting cheesy is that we want to be a player-friendly organization,” Lagerwey said. “Clint had asked if we could send him back to L.A. He won a championship for us and we felt he'd held up his end of the bargain.” 5. MLS Commissioner Don Garber isn't nearly as doom and gloom about the CBA negotiations as one might think. The key point to the negotiations, Garber stressed when he addressed the media during a break in the action, is that there is still time remaining to strike a deal. The fact that the two sides are still talking – even if those discussions aren't yielding any results – represents a good sign, according to Garber. “You know how these things are,” Garber said. “We're making progress. It's good that we're spending a lot of time (together). We met almost all day yesterday. That's progress. Better than we were (at) a couple of weeks ago.” Questions & Answers(In the spirit of interactivity, I've picked out a few choice questions each day during draft week and answered them in this space. Get in the game by following along on Twitter – @kylejmccarthy – or dropping me a line via e-mail.) Why no love for GKs?@zacrigg, via Twitter Even the Goal.com editors were confused about why goalkeepers were persona non grata at the SuperDraft this year. Only two goalkeepers – Generation adidas stopper Sean Johnson (Central Florida) and senior signee Brian Perk (UCLA) – were selected and Perk was the first to come off the board after Los Angeles snatched him with the 49th pick. After watching the shotstoppers at the Combine, I wasn't particularly shocked by their scarcity in the draft. How bad were the goalkeepers? Just ask New York sporting director Erik Soler. “Personally, I didn't think any of the goalkeepers would have helped us, so we didn't really look at that position,” Soler said. “That might be unfair to the goalies, but we didn't look much for a goalie.” What draftee do you see most likely to be a USMNT regular down the road?@Sean_Heffernan, via Twitter Opara narrowly edges this one over Tony Tchani, assuming the newly minted Red Bull can get his American citizenship in order. Opara's style of play combines his physical tools and his mental acuity and that's a combination that few American defenders, past or present, can match. If Opara adapts well to the professional game, he's the type of player with a significant future at the international level. Any news on KC trading Conrad?@TheBackpost, via Twitter Of all of the rumors floating around the Pennsylvania Convention Center, this one was certainly the most ridiculous. Peter Vermes would have to come out of retirement and play central defense for the Wizards if he shipped Conrad out of town. Vermes, incidentally, strongly denied the rumors to Soccer by Ives late on Thursday afternoon. What's the deal with Revolution midfielder Jeff Larentowicz and Colorado?Many, many New England fans, via Twitter Larentowicz is out of contract and the two sides are at an impasse on a new deal. The contract stalemate means one of two things: Larentowicz has to go on trial and find a deal in Europe or he has to locate some MLS team that is willing to trade for his rights and meet his salary demands. Since Larentowicz has been continually bothered by a knee problem for the past several months and recently pulled out of U.S. national team camp, the European option looks somewhat suspect right now. Several MLS teams have expressed interest in acquiring Larentowicz's rights and Colorado is among them. Talks are ongoing between the two teams, but no deal has been struck and no deal was imminent as of Thursday night. In other words, there are still a few moving parts to this story, so stay tuned.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 7:20 am
Quote: Allsopp's Arrival Draws Parallels Between MLS, A-League D.C. United signed former Melbourne Victory star Danny Allsopp on Monday after the Australian striker completed a short spell in Qatar. Kyle McCarthy explains how the move shows that salary cap restrictions are felt outside the American top flight.
Jan 20, 2010 By Kyle McCarthy MLS isn't the only salary-capped league in the world that loses productive players because it can't pay market value. Just ask Danny Allsopp. Allsopp, 31, left A-League champions Melbourne Victory in September to sign a lucrative three-year deal with Qatari side Al-Rayyan. The petro-dollars were too high for the Melbourne native to turn down, particularly with strike partner Archie Thompson occupying Victory's lone Marquee Player slot. (As an aside, the Marquee Player tag – the Australian version of the Designated Player rule – doesn't always mean marquee dollars Down Under. Newcastle Jets signed former Bologna and Lazio midfielder Fabio Vignaroli to a one-year deal worth approximately $275,000 (AU$300,000) and Thompson was reported to be in line for a contract in the region of $367,000 (AU$400,000) per season when he inked a new deal to replaced the one that expired in April 2009, according to the Melbourne Herald Sun. One other note: no part of the Marquee Player's salary counts against the $2.06 million (AU$2.25 million) salary cap, though the Marquee Player does take up a spot on the 23-man roster.) Things went sour for Allsopp in Qatar earlier this month after Al-Rayyan coach Paulo Autuori recalled Oman international striker Emad Al Hosani from an unsuccessful stint at Belgian club Charleroi. Al-Rayyan deemed the three-times-capped Australian international surplus to requirements and handed him a free transfer despite a record of six goals in 12 matches. The prospect of inking a prolific A-League scorer – Allsopp won the golden boot in 2007 – on a free interested several clubs back home, but Victory coach Ernie Merrick eventually brushed aside the paper talk and dismissed his side's chances of obtaining its former striker. “If he came back to Australia he'd play with us, but he's getting some very lucrative offers overseas and I'm pretty sure he's going to take one of those,” Merrick told the Herald Sun. Most of the speculation linked Allsopp with a move to China – former A-League standout Joel Griffiths recently completed a protracted transfer to Beijing Guoan after a successful loan spell – or somewhere else in Asia in a move similar to the ones made by a few other former A-League stars. The media chatter didn't link Allsopp with a “lucrative offer” in the United States and the chance to enter the history books as the first Australian to play in a MLS match. In hindsight, it should have. Allsopp signed a two-year deal (plus option years) with D.C. United on Monday as United tries to fill the void left by Luciano Emilio's return to Brazil. The deal evoked memories of United's move to sign Fred from Melbourne in 2007. The Brazilian midfielder had established himself as perhaps the top player in the Australian top flight during a one-year stint with Melbourne, but the Victory couldn't match United's mega-bucks offer when D.C. swooped to sign Fred on a free transfer. The princely sum required to lure Fred away: $222,000 per season, plus a signing bonus. Given the mid-season A-League cap crunch and the two-year guarantee on offer, it may not have cost United even that much to sign Allsopp. At least in the Australian market, MLS can offer a competitive deal to players with a proven track record of success. The real question for United is whether Allsopp will merit the outlay. Fred flattered to deceive during his three years in D.C. with a stellar first season followed by two rather disappointing campaigns, an informative bit of evidence that may or may not hold much weight in determining whether Allsopp can transfer his game to the States. Allsopp, a strong, target-type forward with an established goalscoring record in the English lower divisions with Hull and Notts County, may need some time to find his feet – he has spent most of his career playing at a standard lower than the one currently on offer in MLS. The rough and tumble nature of the league shouldn't bother him, but the question of quality – Australia coach Pim Verbeek once called Allsopp “absolutely hopeless” after watching him play in an Asian Cup qualifier against Indonesia – will stick until he produces goals consistently. No matter the result, Allsopp and his performances bear watching as the 2010 campaign approaches. If Allsopp can deliver the goods, it could prompt other MLS clubs to dabble in the Australian market and mine it for the type of low- and moderately-priced talent required to stock the league. If he doesn't, MLS can at least take solace that it isn't the only league in the world that watches successful players leave primarily due to financial restrictions imposed by a salary cap and groans as they struggle elsewhere.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Casting Pearls night Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casting Pearls night Captain
|
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 7:23 am
Quote: The Friday Five Wraps Up A Busy Week The transaction wire hummed with activity this week and Kyle McCarthy recaps the all of the moves in the Friday Five.Jan 22, 2010 By Kyle McCarthy Open up the flood gates. Players are on the move. With training camps scheduled to open over the next two weeks and the MLS Players Union announcing yesterday that players would report to them while the Collective Bargaining Agreement negotiations continue, MLS clubs completed a series of post-SuperDraft transactions to continue to assemble their rosters for the upcoming 2010 campaign. The moves are too numerous to encapulsate in a brief space, but the Friday Five picked out a few of the noteworthy roster changes for further inspection: 1. Houston has some serious reconstruction work to do in the center of the park. With Ricardo Clark now on a short-term deal at Eintracht Frankfurt with an eye towards a long-term contract in the summer, the Dynamo has already officially lost its box-to-box midfielder. Replacing its creative presence in central midfield may be the next move after Houston COO Chris Canetti told the Houston Chronicle that he expects Stuart Holden will join Bolton. Dynamo coach Dominic Kinnear can shift the versatile Geoff Cameron into midfield to help address the void, but Cameron can't play both spots. A pair of Canadians – the recently-linked Patrice Bernier and the recently-acquired Kevin Harmse – might help to provide some depth, but Houston will likely have to make a more significant move to add some attacking thrust in midfield. 2. New England and Colorado pulled off a mutually beneficial blockbuster. There will be much more to say on this deal in the Monday MLS Breakdown, but it's fair to note for the moment that this is a swap that suits both sides. Colorado gets the best player (Jeff Larentowicz) and a much-needed winger (Wells Thompson), while New England fills two significant holes at left back (Cory Gibbs) and goalkeeper (Preston Burpo) and obtains a few extra spoils for its troubles (allocation money and a third-round draft pick in 2011). The key to the trade: Larentowicz inked a fresh contract with MLS, ensuring that Colorado would have him in uniform for the start of the 2010 season. 3. TFC needed a winger desperately, but does this particular winger make sense? In a related move, Colorado shipped Jacob Peterson to Toronto FC in exchange for allocation money. Peterson, 23, showed potential in flashes during his four years in Colorado, but often performs more like a runner than a footballer. Peterson's cap charge ($100,000 base last season, though the amount is always subject to change in MLS), international designation (an American on a club that needs to make a move to accommodate his nationality) and injury status (sidelined while recovering from a right ACL tear sustained in September) make this move a curious one even with the Reds' acute need for wide players. 4. Chivas USA will miss Paulo Nagamura far more than most people expect. The 26-year-old Brazilian midfielder may have featured frequently during a two-year stint with Los Angeles, but he found his home with the Red-and-White over the past three seasons after a brief stint in Toronto. During an impressive 2009 campaign, Nagamura burnished his credentials as a two-way player in central midfield. Those box-to-box performances - complete with his usual combativeness - caught the eye of scouts south of the border. Nagamura signed a six-month deal with Tigres this week, leaving a significant gap for Chivas USA to fill in its engine room. Others may have received more of the credit, but Nagamura made Chivas USA tick. 5. Blair Gavin may have to play sooner rather than later. With short-timer Harmse headed to Houston, Chivas USA can count on the experienced Jesse Marsch, the rangy and raw Michael Lahoud and the versatile Marcelo Saragosa to possibly form the central midfield duo if Sacha Kljestan remains out wide. One new option may have to play a significant role if Marsch struggles with his aging legs or injury problems or Lahoud and Saragosa fall out of form: recent draft pick Blair Gavin. The fit – a smooth, ball-winning defensive midfielder on a team that plays a possession-oriented style – made as much sense from the outside as it did to Chivas USA coach Martin Vasquez. “I see him as a number six because he can do the job of a number six, but he can also be a creative player,” Vasquez said moments after the Red-and-White selected Gavin with the tenth overall pick in last week's SuperDraft. “When he was available, he was our man.”
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:42 pm
Quote: European Dalliance Could Impact Freddie Ljungberg's Seattle Future Freddie Ljungberg declared his commitment to Seattle on Tuesday after weighing the possibility of a move back to Europe. Kyle McCarthy argues Ljungberg's messy flirtation could leave him with fences to mend once he returns to the Pacific Northwest.
Jan 27, 2010 By Kyle McCarthy Give Freddie Ljungberg some credit. By Tuesday afternoon, he finally got his story straight about why he wasn't practicing with the rest of his Seattle teammates when Sounders FC training camp opened on Monday morning. “I can say that the reason I missed training this week was because of a communication error due to the business discussions,” Ljungberg wrote on his personal blog. “I had by this point already committed to playing with the Sounders next year, which I am very excited about.” The resolution – Ljungberg spurning European suitors to commit to Sounders FC for a second season – makes sense. The circuitous progression to the final outcome, however, invites confusion and speculation. The whole snafu probably started with that pesky lingering European interest in Ljungberg's services. Reports cropped up intermittently, linking Ljungberg with moves to any number of clubs that weren't particularly interested in him when he was available on a free transfer after leaving West Ham in the summer of 2008. What happened next descends deep into a murky mire far removed from the Swedish powder Ljungberg carved up during the offseason. Maybe the renewed interest turned Ljungberg's head a bit. Maybe the former Arsenal star wanted to test the waters to see which of the two sets of rules employed in these situations – the free European loan passes handed to David Beckham and Landon Donovan or the strictures keeping everyone else Stateside – applied to him. Maybe the concern he expressed about the Collective Bargaining Agreement talks prompted him to evaluate possible alternatives to stay on the field. Although the rationale behind Ljungberg's possible interest in a European move remains uncertain, it is clear that Ljungberg and Seattle contemplated the possibility that he might move on after one season. Sounders FC coach Sigi Schmid told reporters on Monday that his club knew that Ljungberg “was looking at options in Europe” and previously discussed his possible departure internally. Ljungberg's handwringing about the CBA on his personal blog last week indicated the Swede had done the same. His absence from the first day of training camp said all that needed to be said about how seriously he had weighed the possibility of leaving. Before Ljungberg, his agent, Seattle general manager Adrian Hanauer and Schmid bridged the communications gap that led to Schmid's behind-the-times statements on Monday, two prominent figures expressed their displeasure with Ljungberg's absence. Schmid told the Seattle Times “ t's not OK” and noted that Ljungberg would likely faced internal discipline for his failure to report on time. The more interesting statement, at least from an outsider's perspective, came from Sounders FC captain Kasey Keller.
“I want the players on this team who want to be here,” Keller told The News-Tribune (Tacoma, Wash.). “If Freddie wants to be here and wants to be fully committed, then sure. If he doesn’t, it’s more of a distraction than a benefit. That’s how I am: I’d much rather have a guy with less talent that wants to be here than a guy with great talent who doesn’t.”
Call Keller's comments a shot over the bow, but it isn't a great leap to say Ljungberg will have some work to do in the locker room to atone for his waffling commitment to the cause. Considering the stakes in play with the CBA negotiations, there could hardly be a worse time to isolate yourself from your teammates. Togetherness is almost compulsory in an environment where the rank-and-file MLS player is staring into the abyss of a work stoppage, even though the peril lessens slightly with each passing day and with each positive comment uttered from the mouth of a Union player rep. At a time when many players are preaching and practicing unity, Ljungberg – one of the few players with a host of alternative options and one of the very few wealthy enough to withstand a work stoppage without incurring significant financial harm – distanced himself from his teammates and pursued his own agenda. Some will forgive him readily and let the incident pass quickly, while others may not.
Ljungberg appears to understand that he may have misstepped. He straightened out the so-called confusion, espoused the need for players to fight for their rights in the CBA negotiations, contended he had been told there would be no work stoppage and reaffirmed his commitment to Seattle in that Tuesday afternoon blog posting. Expect him to express similar sentiments when he takes the training field for the first time next Monday.
The real examination of Ljungberg's narrative will occur behind closed doors once he joins his teammates. Only then will he discover how his desire to keep his short-term European options open will impact the short- and long-term future with the best choice he possessed all along.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Casting Pearls night Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|