|
|
| True? |
| Yes, definitely! |
|
10% |
[ 2 ] |
| For the majority. Not for me. |
|
50% |
[ 10 ] |
| For some people. Most people are better than that. |
|
40% |
[ 8 ] |
| No, it doesn't seem accurate. |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 10:13 am
Okay, I thought these were really funny. (I know, I'm such a hypocrit. These are irrelevant and a little mean.) 
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:43 pm
SO TRUE.
P.S. It's spelled hypocrite.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:38 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 6:55 pm
That is so sexist. stressed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 8:46 am
*shrug* Well, it may be. And it is. Honestly, I am guilty sometimes of indulging myself in such things. And yet, I must say that if not true, it is somewhat comical considering modern media.
And I realized recently that I may be sexist against women. You know the whole "power of women" thing that's been floating around for the past 150 years or so? And in basic psychology, most people like to oppose common belief when there appears to be a reason to do so. I oppose women (BUT NOT WOMEN'S RIGHTS!) as being completely smart (and furthermore smarter than men, as is suggested) because women are not all that smart. And neither are men. Humankind, as a whole, is completely idiotic. And so, women can't just say they're the smartest automatically, because men get muscle and women get brains. That's just sexist in itself. Men are naturally stronger, and I know that. Women, not having the same hormones, have a different kind of control over their actions, and they have different emotions, including, as I believe, more empathy, because of that. But it can't be said that women are smart in compensation of the fact that they are physically weaker. It's scientifically inaccurate.
[End of rant]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 8:49 am
Social satire. Good form of comedy, good form of reflection.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 11:07 am
LOL
It seems to have hit pretty close to the mark.
You know your right when you incite resignation and denial.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 11:29 am
As a biology nerd, the placement's a bit off: front-thought top-feeling middle-hearing back-seeing bottom middle - movement Also, the chocolate center needs to be bigger. Jerba And so, women can't just say they're the smartest automatically, because men get muscle and women get brains. That's just sexist in itself. Men are naturally stronger, and I know that. Women, not having the same hormones, have a different kind of control over their actions, and they have different emotions, including, as I believe, more empathy, because of that. But it can't be said that women are smart in compensation of the fact that they are physically weaker. It's scientifically inaccurate.[End of rant] There are some pretty dumb a** girls, I can assure you. The intelligence thing is a bit more complicated. Men's brains are, believe it or not, bigger (that is, they have more mass). This is because all male organs are typically bigger. The crutch regarding the size, however, is that the connectivity between the 2 lobes isn't as strong. This is why men have "one-track minds"; they can't multi-task as well. Women's brains are, on average, smaller in terms of mass, but the size makes for better connectivity, thus better multi-tasking. This is most likely due to development; men's brains are more focused on a single task, like hunting/gathering, and women's brains are more multi-tasking, for raising the kids. The problem is that gender roles have switched, so the brain has to take on the functions of the other gender's brain. It's possible, obviously, but it's interesting to note.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 6:56 pm
i beleive that these are true because males are more sexually driven while females are more emotionally driven. Its something I learned in my college psychology class.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 31, 2009 9:12 am
Golden Dysprosium As a biology nerd, the placement's a bit off: front-thought top-feeling middle-hearing back-seeing bottom middle - movement Also, the chocolate center needs to be bigger. Jerba And so, women can't just say they're the smartest automatically, because men get muscle and women get brains. That's just sexist in itself. Men are naturally stronger, and I know that. Women, not having the same hormones, have a different kind of control over their actions, and they have different emotions, including, as I believe, more empathy, because of that. But it can't be said that women are smart in compensation of the fact that they are physically weaker. It's scientifically inaccurate.[End of rant] There are some pretty dumb a** girls, I can assure you. The intelligence thing is a bit more complicated. Men's brains are, believe it or not, bigger (that is, they have more mass). This is because all male organs are typically bigger. The crutch regarding the size, however, is that the connectivity between the 2 lobes isn't as strong. This is why men have "one-track minds"; they can't multi-task as well. Women's brains are, on average, smaller in terms of mass, but the size makes for better connectivity, thus better multi-tasking. This is most likely due to development; men's brains are more focused on a single task, like hunting/gathering, and women's brains are more multi-tasking, for raising the kids. The problem is that gender roles have switched, so the brain has to take on the functions of the other gender's brain. It's possible, obviously, but it's interesting to note. On a similar note: Albert Einstein had a very small brain, which made his neurons closer and allowed him to calculate things in his head much faster and more accurately.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:08 am
xd Ah man, that's funny. Highly inaccurate for me, but funny none-the-less.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 12:18 am
I'll tell you one thing right now that's wrong for me. The largest portion of the male brain should definitely be switched with most of the female brain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 8:50 pm
Jerba *shrug* Well, it may be. And it is. Honestly, I am guilty sometimes of indulging myself in such things. And yet, I must say that if not true, it is somewhat comical considering modern media.
And I realized recently that I may be sexist against women. You know the whole "power of women" thing that's been floating around for the past 150 years or so? And in basic psychology, most people like to oppose common belief when there appears to be a reason to do so. I oppose women (BUT NOT WOMEN'S RIGHTS!) as being completely smart (and furthermore smarter than men, as is suggested) because women are not all that smart. And neither are men. Humankind, as a whole, is completely idiotic. And so, women can't just say they're the smartest automatically, because men get muscle and women get brains. That's just sexist in itself. Men are naturally stronger, and I know that. Women, not having the same hormones, have a different kind of control over their actions, and they have different emotions, including, as I believe, more empathy, because of that. But it can't be said that women are smart in compensation of the fact that they are physically weaker. It's scientifically inaccurate.
[End of rant] I have two main points from that. One, rants are fun to read, and two, it's fun to learn somthing new.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
