|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:55 pm
Okay, for those of you who have not been paying atention to my sig, I'm a furry, and danm proud of it. I'm sure a few of you have heard of furries (Oh God I hope it wasn't through MTV or CSI) Well, I havn't gotten any comments on being a furr. Umm...so...uhh...what are your view on the supculture ( http://www.gaiaonline.com/gaia/redirect.php?r=http://www.vexen.co.uk/human/furry.html <-- a link for those of you who don't knwo or don;t fully understand a furry. Oh, in case your woindering, no, I don't like sex with animals, nore do I condone it. Nore would I ever touch an animal in such away...unless it was my job as a stud farm...EEEEEEEEEWWWWWWWWW gonk )
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 4:29 pm
I think that anthropomorphic art is awesome. Sonic the hedgehog, the characters from the Bloody Roar series, etc. are some of my favorite kinds of characters.
So, except for the sub-sub culture of the sex-furries, I've got no problem at all with Furries. XD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 4:49 pm
I.Am I think that anthropomorphic art is awesome. Sonic the hedgehog, the characters from the Bloody Roar series, etc. are some of my favorite kinds of characters. So, except for the sub-sub culture of the sex-furries, I've got no problem at all with Furries. XD Falicia, yeah, Hawt. Umm...>.> I'll leave at I have her as a back ground on my desk top What do oyu mena by sex furries? You mean the kind that dress up as anthromoprhs and yiff...sorry...ummm...have sex? WHat wrong with that? How is it any diffrent then any other kink?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 4:53 pm
Ah, with them I wouldn't say I necessarily have a problem, I just think that they are strange. Like, dressing up as animals to have sex with each other? That's a little odd. It's like saying, "I'd rather have sex with an animal then a human, but that's just weird, so instead, lets dress up like animals."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 4:57 pm
I.Am Ah, with them I wouldn't say I necessarily have a problem, I just think that they are strange. Like, dressing up as animals to have sex with each other? That's a little odd. It's like saying, "I'd rather have sex with an animal then a human, but that's just weird, so instead, lets dress up like animals." But since their anthros, not not really animal, can it be considered haivng sex wiht an animal? ANd its not liek that, not for most. I know a few who have done somthign like that in their fursuit, and that was not the thought on their mind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 5:31 pm
Ok, I'll just stick with my idea that it's strange, and not worry about it. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 6:40 pm
Hm. Well, personally, I'm all about people doing whatever they want, sexually.
As long as it's consensual, and legal, and all that good stuff. Whatev.
However, I'd like to ask you...
I know you disagree with homosexuality, but how can you when you yourself participate in a sexual lifestyle that deviates from the normal?
I mean, really, what's so different about furries versus homosexuals?
Really, though, one sexuality is as good as another.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 6:49 pm
Yeah.... Furry sub-culture......have fun and don't hurt yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 7:02 pm
Well...
It's a bit different. I mean, homosexuality has to do with who you're having sex with. furries has to do with what you're wearing when you have sex. It's a fetish, not a sexual preferrence per se.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 7:17 pm
lymelady Well... It's a bit different. I mean, homosexuality has to do with who you're having sex with. furries has to do with what you're wearing when you have sex. It's a fetish, not a sexual preferrence per se.
Penises, tails.
etc.
I don't know-- I just think that if you have sexual proclivities that you want others to accept, you should accept theirs.
Say, for instance, if you were someone who liked sloshing(British-type fetish about liquids and sauces into your private areas. Don't ask how I know gonk ).
That disgusts me in general-- but if I was someone who liked "golden showers" (peeing, etc gonk ) I think it would be a bit odd of me to find the slosher objectionable, morally, or something.
I feel filthy. Ugh. gonk
But anyway, I know homosexuality is about the person, but if being a furry is seen as a legitimate and acceptable sexuality, then how can you not view homosexuality as such?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 7:22 pm
If you can disprove the relationship between your furry and CSI's, you're okay with me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 8:06 pm
Mcphee Hm. Well, personally, I'm all about people doing whatever they want, sexually.
As long as it's consensual, and legal, and all that good stuff. Whatev.
However, I'd like to ask you...
I know you disagree with homosexuality, but how can you when you yourself participate in a sexual lifestyle that deviates from the normal?
I mean, really, what's so different about furries versus homosexuals?
Really, though, one sexuality is as good as another. I'm afraid your question is invalid since there are plenty of homosexual furrs and the fact that I'm not tryign to justifies its devience. INfact, most of the life style is homosexual or bisexual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 8:07 pm
kp606 If you can disprove the relationship between your furry and CSI's, you're okay with me. read the link rolleyes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 8:08 pm
Pyrotechnic Oracle Mcphee Hm. Well, personally, I'm all about people doing whatever they want, sexually.
As long as it's consensual, and legal, and all that good stuff. Whatev.
However, I'd like to ask you...
I know you disagree with homosexuality, but how can you when you yourself participate in a sexual lifestyle that deviates from the normal?
I mean, really, what's so different about furries versus homosexuals?
Really, though, one sexuality is as good as another. I'm afraid your question is invalid since there are plenty of homosexual furrs. INfact, most of the life style is homosexual or bisexual
I'd just like to know why you seperate furriness from homosexuality, I guess.
Why is being a furry acceptable, while homosexuality is not, to you?
I don't know. It confuses me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 8:09 pm
Mcphee lymelady Well... It's a bit different. I mean, homosexuality has to do with who you're having sex with. furries has to do with what you're wearing when you have sex. It's a fetish, not a sexual preferrence per se.
Penises, tails.
etc.
I don't know-- I just think that if you have sexual proclivities that you want others to accept, you should accept theirs.
Say, for instance, if you were someone who liked sloshing(British-type fetish about liquids and sauces into your private areas. Don't ask how I know gonk ).
That disgusts me in general-- but if I was someone who liked "golden showers" (peeing, etc gonk ) I think it would be a bit odd of me to find the slosher objectionable, morally, or something.
I feel filthy. Ugh. gonk
But anyway, I know homosexuality is about the person, but if being a furry is seen as a legitimate and acceptable sexuality, then how can you not view homosexuality as such?Its not a sexuality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
