|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 2:57 pm
We need a rule where MOTM Candidates can't be Crew/Vice/Capt because it feels real shady when the entire list is comprised of most if not all crew and up. This is just my personal opinion, what do you all think?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:26 pm
That's kinda stupid, imo. Crew are members too. The last list basically summed up who I thought deserved it before it was editted.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 7:09 pm
Gore Couture That's kinda stupid, imo. Crew are members too. The last list basically summed up who I thought deserved it before it was editted.Yeah but being crew shows they already are worthy Morons, I think MOTM is for nonpower members who have oushone their peers sweatdrop
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 7:37 pm
That's where I disagree. D:
Crew has nothing to do with worth. It has to do with what the person does within the guild.
Therefore, crew shouldn't matter in regards to MotM. If a member of this guild shines, they should be nominated. Crew or not.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:35 am
I gotta agree with Gore.
If only worthy member were on crew, you can bet there would be a lot more of the older members on it.
When we nominate motm we need to ignore status.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 10:46 am
I've been thinking about it, and think that a person shouldn't be nominated two months in a row.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|