|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 5:54 pm
Read title, yay/nay, etc.
because it got separated into two parts. tadaah
now I'll just go back to making my armwarmers
they keep my arms warm. xD
People who say yay and jump in the air like "yay!"
1. Nymphie
2. Buzz
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 6:44 pm
As before, nay, for the same reasons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 6:46 pm
Beru why you no come to skype chat. Its boring now and I'm lonely. :<
Oh and I think kroo should not veto, but should be able to vote.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 6:47 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 7:10 pm
OHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I GET IT!!!!
Like if crew votes on a petitions then they really have no business sending the vote through them.
Cuz it's not fair if they get their own separate vote on top of the guild vote.
OHHH!!!!
GOT IT!!!!!!!
I SAY YAY!!
Not really fair that they can't make petitions though, cuz they can't make any changes to the guild without it...
SO! It's more of a yay
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 7:31 pm
how about this - kroo petitions go up on the kroo mule, so they're a kroo idea and not a specific user's idea. but past that kroo can't make or vote in and kroo mule can't vote in.
that I vote for <3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 7:43 pm
I'm not voting for this, because I do not understand the purpose.
I am all for removing the Kroo Veto part of the Petition process, but I think Kroo should still be able to vote or petition. They're guild members too.
This way, we don't have to worry about what a Kroo member's opinions are, because it won't have any more significant effect on a petition than a user's opposition or approval.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 7:48 pm
@pixie I like this, except that if one Kroo member doesn't like it then it removes the foundation of it, and yeah...
... but it's a good idea if this gets enough iawtc
@shoy which is why I am remaking the veto ban thread in another tab right now. :>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 7:54 pm
Bellecat @pixie I like this, except that if one Kroo member doesn't like it then it removes the foundation of it, and yeah... ... but it's a good idea if this gets enough iawtc @shoy which is why I am remaking the veto ban thread in another tab right now. :> kroo should be united. anything that went through on kroo mule would have been voted through in kroo first. so 4 kroo vote for, goes up on kroo mule. is not just willy-nilly kroo mule petitions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 8:33 pm
Pixie Saylor Bellecat @pixie I like this, except that if one Kroo member doesn't like it then it removes the foundation of it, and yeah... ... but it's a good idea if this gets enough iawtc @shoy which is why I am remaking the veto ban thread in another tab right now. :> kroo should be united. anything that went through on kroo mule would have been voted through in kroo first. so 4 kroo vote for, goes up on kroo mule. is not just willy-nilly kroo mule petitions. but what happens if one Kroo person REALLY REALLY REALLY doesn't want it, but there's still a majority?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 8:42 pm
Bellecat Pixie Saylor Bellecat @pixie I like this, except that if one Kroo member doesn't like it then it removes the foundation of it, and yeah... ... but it's a good idea if this gets enough iawtc @shoy which is why I am remaking the veto ban thread in another tab right now. :> kroo should be united. anything that went through on kroo mule would have been voted through in kroo first. so 4 kroo vote for, goes up on kroo mule. is not just willy-nilly kroo mule petitions. but what happens if one Kroo person REALLY REALLY REALLY doesn't want it, but there's still a majority? They suck it up and drive on... They should go along with it even if they REALLY REALLY REALLY don't like it because they ARE Kroo and will have to deal with it. (I know how much you guys here all this "DEAL WITH IT" crap, but everyone is kinda shoving it in Kroo's face right now)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 8:48 pm
o: Should I remove my post from earlier now that there's a thread I support?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 8:56 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 9:03 pm
[Moseley] Bellecat Pixie Saylor Bellecat @pixie I like this, except that if one Kroo member doesn't like it then it removes the foundation of it, and yeah... ... but it's a good idea if this gets enough iawtc @shoy which is why I am remaking the veto ban thread in another tab right now. :> kroo should be united. anything that went through on kroo mule would have been voted through in kroo first. so 4 kroo vote for, goes up on kroo mule. is not just willy-nilly kroo mule petitions. but what happens if one Kroo person REALLY REALLY REALLY doesn't want it, but there's still a majority? They suck it up and drive on... They should go along with it even if they REALLY REALLY REALLY don't like it because they ARE Kroo and will have to deal with it. (I know how much you guys here all this "DEAL WITH IT" crap, but everyone is kinda shoving it in Kroo's face right now) this. kroo should publicly not diss kroo ideas and sometimes just need to get over not getting their way. I think we're one by one learning this anyway. xD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
![[Moseley]'s avatar](https://a1cdn.gaiaonline.com/dress-up/avatar/ava/7b/ce/4b5b78311dce7b_flip.png?t=1426877088_6.00_11)
