|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:39 am
i know this may be a bit hard to swallow for some of the more hardcore metallica fans. i still like their old stuff, but as soon as they changed their image and sobered up, they stopped making good music and became media whores. metallica betrayed metal.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 8:32 am
They didnt betray anyone, or anything; they were just influened by other bands of the current time.
They admitted, in multiple DVDs (Black Album for example), that they were influenced by the bands around their time. Heck, even Lars was influenced by Hendrix (he admits that he stole the opening riff to a solo from one of Hendrix's songs).
With how 'metal' music is nowadays, they decided to give things a switch for one album to see how things went.
Not only that, but think about it. James was just getting out of rehab, and people were demanding a CD from them. What are they going to do? Sit down, and work on a single song for 5 months like before?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 4:10 pm
Antics They didnt betray anyone, or anything; they were just influened by other bands of the current time. They admitted, in multiple DVDs (Black Album for example), that they were influenced by the bands around their time. Heck, even Lars was influenced by Hendrix (he admits that he stole the opening riff to a solo from one of Hendrix's songs). With how 'metal' music is nowadays, they decided to give things a switch for one album to see how things went. Not only that, but think about it. James was just getting out of rehab, and people were demanding a CD from them. What are they going to do? Sit down, and work on a single song for 5 months like before? so? I mean no disrespect or anything....but when a chicken doesnt want to lay eggs anymore.....you dont......let it make shitty rock music anymore do you?... you take it out back and slapp it around some, then maybe rape it.. then kill it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 7:55 pm
Cheo-tsin Antics They didnt betray anyone, or anything; they were just influened by other bands of the current time. They admitted, in multiple DVDs (Black Album for example), that they were influenced by the bands around their time. Heck, even Lars was influenced by Hendrix (he admits that he stole the opening riff to a solo from one of Hendrix's songs). With how 'metal' music is nowadays, they decided to give things a switch for one album to see how things went. Not only that, but think about it. James was just getting out of rehab, and people were demanding a CD from them. What are they going to do? Sit down, and work on a single song for 5 months like before? so? I mean no disrespect or anything....but when a chicken doesnt want to lay eggs anymore.....you dont......let it make shitty rock music anymore do you?... you take it out back and slapp it around some, then maybe rape it.. then kill it. Erm, I do believe your trying to use a metephor where it wouldnt work out. ;x Just so ya know.. "but when a chicken doesnt want to lay eggs anymore.....you dont......let it make shitty rock music anymore do you?" You make it sound like your insulting Metallica's older work.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 9:50 am
Antics Cheo-tsin Antics They didnt betray anyone, or anything; they were just influened by other bands of the current time. They admitted, in multiple DVDs (Black Album for example), that they were influenced by the bands around their time. Heck, even Lars was influenced by Hendrix (he admits that he stole the opening riff to a solo from one of Hendrix's songs). With how 'metal' music is nowadays, they decided to give things a switch for one album to see how things went. Not only that, but think about it. James was just getting out of rehab, and people were demanding a CD from them. What are they going to do? Sit down, and work on a single song for 5 months like before? so? I mean no disrespect or anything....but when a chicken doesnt want to lay eggs anymore.....you dont......let it make shitty rock music anymore do you?... you take it out back and slapp it around some, then maybe rape it.. then kill it. Erm, I do believe your trying to use a metephor where it wouldnt work out. ;x Just so ya know.. "but when a chicken doesnt want to lay eggs anymore.....you dont......let it make shitty rock music anymore do you?" You make it sound like your insulting Metallica's older work. no, im talking about everything after and justice for all
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 6:07 pm
Antics They didnt betray anyone, or anything; they were just influened by other bands of the current time. They admitted, in multiple DVDs (Black Album for example), that they were influenced by the bands around their time. Heck, even Lars was influenced by Hendrix (he admits that he stole the opening riff to a solo from one of Hendrix's songs). With how 'metal' music is nowadays, they decided to give things a switch for one album to see how things went. Not only that, but think about it. James was just getting out of rehab, and people were demanding a CD from them. What are they going to do? Sit down, and work on a single song for 5 months like before? you make sense. Metallica's just shakin stuff. it's their music, we don't really have the right to complain. if they want to do things a little different, they can. it's not that the newer stuff is bad, we're just not used to it. it's different is all
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 7:13 am
metafirequeen Antics They didnt betray anyone, or anything; they were just influened by other bands of the current time. They admitted, in multiple DVDs (Black Album for example), that they were influenced by the bands around their time. Heck, even Lars was influenced by Hendrix (he admits that he stole the opening riff to a solo from one of Hendrix's songs). With how 'metal' music is nowadays, they decided to give things a switch for one album to see how things went. Not only that, but think about it. James was just getting out of rehab, and people were demanding a CD from them. What are they going to do? Sit down, and work on a single song for 5 months like before? you make sense. Metallica's just shakin stuff. it's their music, we don't really have the right to complain. if they want to do things a little different, they can. it's not that the newer stuff is bad, we're just not used to it. it's different is all yes i agree...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 9:41 am
Kovu19 metafirequeen Antics They didnt betray anyone, or anything; they were just influened by other bands of the current time. They admitted, in multiple DVDs (Black Album for example), that they were influenced by the bands around their time. Heck, even Lars was influenced by Hendrix (he admits that he stole the opening riff to a solo from one of Hendrix's songs). With how 'metal' music is nowadays, they decided to give things a switch for one album to see how things went. Not only that, but think about it. James was just getting out of rehab, and people were demanding a CD from them. What are they going to do? Sit down, and work on a single song for 5 months like before? you make sense. Metallica's just shakin stuff. it's their music, we don't really have the right to complain. if they want to do things a little different, they can. it's not that the newer stuff is bad, we're just not used to it. it's different is all yes i agree... I don't... Seriously, would Metallica have lasted if they debuted with "Load"? Hell ******** no, They woulda been beaten outta the whole state of California by Megadeth, Exodus, Slayer, Forbidden, Sadus, etc. I mean, they racked up a lot of thrash fans during their time as Leather Charm. Then in Metallica they released KEA, a great pioneering thrash album. Followed by RTL, MOP and Justice, which was thrash with some more heavy metal stuff, too. And that small genre change was fine, but when Black Album Came out.. Wtf.. What was that. Obviously their ability to compose and play solos didn't just slip out through cracks in the floor, yet the solos on that album were terrible compared to what came before... And coincidently they got a new money-hungry manager, Bob Rock, at the exact same time. They started playing alt. metal for christ sake, and it got worst with Load and Reload. Terrible, slow, annoying solos, if you could call em that. Very simple drum beats and the riffs were nothing special. Hetfield also lost his great voice from earlier albums.. It was the most alternative that alt. metal could get. And alt. metal and Nu Metal are to metal as pop is to music in general... If you wouldn't consider Black Album a sell-out, I sure as hell would say Load and Reload were. Then came the nu metal album with no solos what-so-ever, which might be a good thing considering how bad their solos had gotten lately. Lars sounded like he was Stomp playing drums on trash cans and cooking pots. And with Bob Rock's terrible Bass Lines and Hetfield showing an even worse side of his voice... They say Newsted "shocked" the metal world by leaving Metallica... I was surprised he didn't after he was hazed on ..Justice, he left Metallica about 12 years after I thought he would have... And I'm glad, too. Why waste Newsted's talent on the New (Nu) Metallica, when he could be helping still good bands like Voivod. And if you don't see that as selling-out, then there is no such thing as selling out... And if you do see it as selling out and still don't think they backstabbed their fans, even though they demolished their fan base and sued their fans not that long ago, then just throw away your Metallica albums and just go start up a Tim Mcgraw cd collection....
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 8:41 am
Just for the record.. James threw out his voice. it's not that he lost it, he just threw it out... now what would happen if he still had it and made all the albums from Metallica to St. Anger... would they be better, who knows.. but u know what i like Metallica whatever kind of music they make and i would never turn my back on them. Yes they may sound different but times change and the sounds of music changes. Remember when Metallica first started they were inspired by Metal groups of their time... there are groups out there now yes but maybe those are sounds that Metallica themselves are not used too... like i said time changes people... we just have to accept that Metallica has changed. in some peoples eyes it's for the worst and in some others peoples eyes it's ok, they can accept it, y can't u accept that time changes all. Even Metalheads.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:44 pm
Kovu19 Just for the record.. James threw out his voice. it's not that he lost it, he just threw it out... now what would happen if he still had it and made all the albums from Metallica to St. Anger... would they be better, who knows.. but u know what i like Metallica whatever kind of music they make and i would never turn my back on them. Yes they may sound different but times change and the sounds of music changes. Remember when Metallica first started they were inspired by Metal groups of their time... there are groups out there now yes but maybe those are sounds that Metallica themselves are not used too... like i said time changes people... we just have to accept that Metallica has changed. in some peoples eyes it's for the worst and in some others peoples eyes it's ok, they can accept it, y can't u accept that time changes all. Even Metalheads. Alright, lets just say he really did throw out his voice, and then for some odd reason, decided to record at that time anyways.. The instrumental parts of St. Anger still sucked nonetheless.. No solos, repetitive and annoying riffs.. Drums consisting of nothing but snare on a shitty drum set.. and Bob Rock on Bass.. it was a disaster. And by Kovu19 Yes they may sound different but times change and the sounds of music changes. Are you saying that the reason Metallica's music is different is because they followed trends.. Thrash isn't about following trends, it's about being metal, thrash metal, and ******** who ever gives enough of a s**t to say otherwise. But obviously they went by the complete opposite of that.. I care more about Cliff Burton (RIP) than Metallica.. If Burton could see Metallica today, he's be forcibly vomitting instantly.. After all that work Burton put into Metallica, after all he did to get them to where they were by MOP. To have them make it as a true metal band.. then to throw it all away for money.. That's a disgrace..
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 2:38 pm
Hallows_Eve Are you saying that the reason Metallica's music is different is because they followed trends.. Thrash isn't about following trends, it's about being metal, thrash metal, and ******** who ever gives enough of a s**t to say otherwise. No, they simply tried something new. If the new album was to have been influenced say by Atreyu, you would more then likely -still- dislike them due to their 'new' sound? Same goes for any other band. Every band tries a new feel once in a awhile. Just because one band tries to appeal to another audience doesn't mean that they now have to stick to that style. Look at say, Avenged Sevenfold. When they started, they were all scream. Now they try a different style (a little softer and not as much scream), they have many more fans.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 3:32 pm
Antics Hallows_Eve Are you saying that the reason Metallica's music is different is because they followed trends.. Thrash isn't about following trends, it's about being metal, thrash metal, and ******** who ever gives enough of a s**t to say otherwise. No, they simply tried something new. If the new album was to have been influenced say by Atreyu, you would more then likely -still- dislike them due to their 'new' sound? Same goes for any other band. Every band tries a new feel once in a awhile. Just because one band tries to appeal to another audience doesn't mean that they now have to stick to that style. Look at say, Avenged Sevenfold. When they started, they were all scream. Now they try a different style (a little softer and not as much scream), they have many more fans. Well you're right about the Atreyu thing.. But that's because I hate Atreyu's sound.. I don't just have a mind set, if it's new, I hate it.. Look at Overkill, I'm a huge fan of everyone of their albums.. Yet "The Killing Kind" was huge change in musical style, yet I still think it came out great, talent, a couple old techniques and a new face that they went with for an album or two. I don't hate it if it's new, I hate it if it sucks.Seriously, "Appeal an Audience"... Metallica was doing that before, they didn't change their style to alternative rock (which is a HUGE uncalled for change), just for the sole reason of appealing an audience.. They did it for what appealing a much bigger mainstream audience would bring, money and mainstream recognition.. Think about it, back in the day of thrash, they said they'd never make a music video, and hated sell-outs.. If they were gunna change their style of music for the sake of music, they'd have gone to something like Classic Heavy Metal, etc.. Not Mainstream Alt. Rock.. Changing a musical style to appeal a larger, more mainstream audience, get more mainstream air-time and increase profits.. Hmm, what's that called, I seem to remember that from somewhere.. Oh yeah, that's called SELLING OUT! And do you know why A7X went for that "softer" more mainstream-acceptable style? To get signed with MTV, which they did.. get signed by MTV!!!!! Death changed their musical style largely to a more melodic Death Metal/Power metal-ish style by the end of their career... Carcass turned into death metal from grindcore by the end of their career... Meshuggah went from tech-thrash to Tech. Jazz Metal... Those are just a few examples of bands who changed their musical style for the sake of music, nothing wrong with that... I liked their albums from before and after the change, meaning, I don't hate everything new a band puts out, just anything new that sucks that a band puts out, like Metallica's later career.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 10:11 am
i agree. metallica's older stuff rocked hard. now that they quit drinking and gooin to tharapy their music is about the past. they need the grow their hair back out and go on a world destuction tour. that when they leave the town people have huge headaches for a week.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|