|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:54 pm
What's your opinion on this one?
For me, I'd say it needs:
More difficulty overall.
More exciting combat.
Larger enemy groups.
Bosses that force you to think outside the box to defeat them.
Zelda's been great so far, but I've breezed through all of them without fail. Heck, with the right exploitation of monster-pops in a dungeon, I even levelled enough to breeze through Zelda II. Difficulty needs to go up, if nothing else. It's still fun, but it could use more.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:02 pm
Nintendo would never do it
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
The Warrior Zolaga Ramora Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:05 pm
I admit I think they should make the game a little more challenging
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 1:11 pm
Except Nintendo would never do it
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
The Warrior Zolaga Ramora Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 4:16 pm
Zolaga Ramora Except Nintendo would never do it That's what everyone said about the Wii topping the sales of the PS3. Until Nintendo did it. The possability is still there, slim though it may be. 3nodding
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 9:38 pm
hopefully they do it with the new wii zelda
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Warrior Zolaga Ramora Vice Captain
|
Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:40 pm
smashbrolink Zolaga Ramora Except Nintendo would never do it That's what everyone said about the Wii topping the sales of the PS3. Until Nintendo did it. The possability is still there, slim though it may be. 3nodding Anybody that said Wii couldn't top PS3 was an idiot. They are sold to completely different audiences, PS3 to people that are good at videogames and people that want a cheap blu-ray play, the Wii directed at everyone else. There isn't one game to the Wii that's difficult to play because the average gamer can't play hard games. If Nintendo made a hard Zelda game people would riot so much that they would never do it again. That's why we don't have another Zelda like Majora's Mask. It's sad.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 1:40 pm
So, you're basically saying that Zelda would be better if it was less accessible to people and only a small number of people had the skill to play it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 2:35 pm
I think Zolaga is right. Nintendo makes games easy purposely because their main target is 'casual gamers'. When Ocarina of Time, Majora's Mask, and even as far back as A Link to the Past was being made Nintendo did not have an obsession with targeting 'casual gamers.' I honestly do think in order for Zelda to be "better" (better of course being a relative term), they should stop focusing on 'casual gamers' and instead focus on the core gamers and people who grew up in the SNES-N64 era. Naturally Nintendo won't do that though because we all know the money is in the casual gamers.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 9:39 pm
maby what they could do to for both "casual" and "hardcore" gamers is maby in the settings you could set the difuculty or maby how they did it for the ocarina or time on gamecube you could play masters quest and it was harder and the dungeons were a little different. that way the player could have a choice of how they want to play
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|