So...
Recently several books that I have read (ones that are on various BTW recommended reading lists), have come off as being basically soft poly when it comes to Wicca. (in particular The Witches' God/ess by the Farrars and Vivianne Crowley's Wicca: The Old Religion in the New Millennnium).
Crowley's book was excellent, but she clearly talks about the Mother, Maiden, Crone aspects and clearly states that the the Lady has many names and many aspects and that she is invoked as various deities at the various Sabbats, etc...
Even more interesting is that she says that Aradia is the name that Wiccans use most often (which if I'm not mistaken, Leland's book was found to be fiction). Granted the book was written in 1996, but in certain ways it is very contradictory to what those on A&J and those here on Gaia have said as far as deity is concerned.
Then there was the link to the
Patricia Crowther interview that was linked recently on A&J, where she talks about "The Craft of the Wise" being the oldest religion in the world (equating it at the same time with witchcraft). She also talks a bit about the MMC aspects of the Goddess.
I am so confused...
confused Also, not too long ago there was a on A&J about the God/ess, but it's wasn't very helpful either, since again it seems to contradict the above mentioned.
And then there was this quote (bolded by me)...
Quote:
We also have some positions here that are more popular
than others; we have some strong critics of Dion Fortune's "soft"
polytheism (myself included*),
but this is more a matter of the culture
of this particular list than a Wiccan theology