|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:18 pm
I've been wondering about this for quite a while now, what would you say is more "pleasing" and "pleasing to look at"?
I personally am not cut, and this thread can go with both genders, considering there are clitorectomies(sp?).
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 11:38 pm
Never heard of a c**t-whatever it was xd But I happen to be cut (I'm an MtF) I don't really know if people like me have any choice.My 'rents got it done shortly after I was born so I'm S.O.L. I personally don't have a preference for one or the other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 11:44 pm
Clitorectomy is female genital mutilation and is illegal in many countries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:32 am
I'm cut, so I don't really have a preference.
And just as Zero Fail said, Clitorectomy is horrible and barbaric, and should be illegal everywhere.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 11:35 am
I'm not cut but it appears to be cut in starry moments.
SO I don't really have a preference. I haven't been in a relationship with someone cut yet but i feel I wont care.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:01 pm
RPGod I'm cut, so I don't really have a preference. And just as Zero Fail said, Clitorectomy is horrible and barbaric, and should be illegal everywhere. I feel the same about circumcision, buuuuut that's a different discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 5:59 pm
I was told that it's better to be un-cut because you receive more pleasure if you are a male. Is this true?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:02 pm
SummerJuicebox: I say "intact" as opposed to "uncut." Since there is more skin, and more nerves then yes. There is more pleasure, plus the foreskin covers some of the overly sensitive parts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:10 pm
SummerJuicebox I was told that it's better to be un-cut because you receive more pleasure if you are a male. Is this true? yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:26 pm
I am cut.
I'm going to say that circumsized is better. It seems to me that it looks better. It's better for women because it is slightly less pleasurable for men, but only very slightly.
I don't know, it seems like it's a better idea in the end. Most men will have to get circumsized eventually, correct?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:30 pm
Vantineutrasictical I am cut. I'm going to say that circumsized is better. It seems to me that it looks better. It's better for women because it is slightly less pleasurable for men, but only very slightly. I don't know, it seems like it's a better idea in the end. Most men will have to get circumsized eventually, correct? why?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:33 pm
Vantineutrasictical I am cut. I'm going to say that circumsized is better. It seems to me that it looks better. It's better for women because it is slightly less pleasurable for men, but only very slightly. I don't know, it seems like it's a better idea in the end. Most men will have to get circumsized eventually, correct? I know a lot of women that like intact penises more. And no, most men do not have to be circumcised. It is very rare that a man needs circumcision.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:56 pm
Zero Fail Vantineutrasictical I am cut. I'm going to say that circumsized is better. It seems to me that it looks better. It's better for women because it is slightly less pleasurable for men, but only very slightly. I don't know, it seems like it's a better idea in the end. Most men will have to get circumsized eventually, correct? I know a lot of women that like intact penises more. And no, most men do not have to be circumcised. It is very rare that a man needs circumcision. I'm going to say that it looks better, anyway. =P I'm also going to say that if it is done, that it's best to be done when we are babies, because we don't remember the pain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 7:02 pm
Vantineutrasictical Zero Fail Vantineutrasictical I am cut. I'm going to say that circumsized is better. It seems to me that it looks better. It's better for women because it is slightly less pleasurable for men, but only very slightly. I don't know, it seems like it's a better idea in the end. Most men will have to get circumsized eventually, correct? I know a lot of women that like intact penises more. And no, most men do not have to be circumcised. It is very rare that a man needs circumcision. I'm going to say that it looks better, anyway. =P I'm also going to say that if it is done, that it's best to be done when we are babies, because we don't remember the pain. But it's done to babies without any sort of anesthetic, or pain reliever. The babies go into shock when it's done. I think it should be done to adults only so a person can decide for themselves instead of their parents deciding for them. An adult won't remember the surgery happening because they would be put under. It's completely cosmetic, anyways.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 8:21 pm
I have to say that, from everything I have heard both before and after this conversation, there is NO WAY any doctor's going to surgically alter my male child if I were ever to have one for some reason (I am supposedly sterile, but we shall see...). It just doesn't seem right to me - why put your child through that pain if you don't absolutely have to? I don't care if he wouldn't remember it later, for the most part it's just pointless to do to them, anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
