|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 9:57 am
I found this article/blog, which discusses some of the most common cruelty issues that are found in the wool industry. Obviously not every sheep lives this way. But this is a reality for most sheep living in factory farms.
Think Wool is a Great Alternative to Fur? Think Again. posted by: Kayla Coleman 8 days ago
"Fashion makes a statement. Even if you are not the type of person who goes to fashion shows, reads fashion magazines, or even vaguely pays attention to what they grab from their closet in the morning. You can't deny it: fashion matters.
Even if you aren't particularly picky about your daily ensemble, all clothes have a design. They're all made from something. The shape, the fabrics, the essence, it all stems from a mother fashion puppeteer. This puppeteer's fashion designs trickle down to every Target and outlet store known to man. The imitation pieces are seen on the backs of everyone from glamazons to truckers to preschoolers.
The convention of said fashion puppeteers -- New York's Mercedes-Benz Fashion Week -- happened last week. And, unfortunately, two very political trends stuck out on nearly every designers' runway: fur and wool.
"Fur!" you may be saying. "Disgusting! How cruel!"
But wool? Many people believe sheep need haircuts, that we're doing them a favor by shearing them. And isn't wool a nice, eco-friendly, sustainable product?
Well, no. A lot of people -- even those still wearing fur -- have heard of the cruelty of the fur industry. There are a number of videos (viewer beware: the images are hard to handle) showing the horrible realities of fur. But the cruel happenings within the wool industry don't always garner the same attention. There are a lot of people who still consider wool to be a "humane" alternative to fur. And some eco-friendly clothing stores and websites carry wool products, adding to the misconception that wool is just a leftover from when a hippie gives a pet sheep a haircut.
But the real story of the wool industry is far from a fairytale of life on the commune.
Let's start with this fact: people who shear sheep get paid per sheep, not by the hour. So when they cut sheep's hair away, they want to do it as fast as they can, which inevitably leads to rough handling and abuse of the animals. The handlers don't wait patiently for the sheep to canter over and the sheep don't sit still while they're being sheared. The process is quite rough. Most sheep are injured and bleed. To maximize thickness of the coat, many sheep are sheared in Spring, long before they would naturally shed their wool. This leaves sheep naked and cold.
The sheep live in crowded, dirty conditions, like every other mass-produced animal. And like other exploited animals, we have bred sheep so large that they can barely support their own body weight. Many die in their holding pens. They get lice, fleece rot, foot rot and their tails are cut off without anesthesia. And male sheep are castrated without anesthesia, too. The procedure is either performed with a knife, or by placing a tight rubber band around the animal's scrotum until it shrivels up and falls off.
And many baby lambs born in these crowded conditions are trampled to death.
Then there's mulesing, an incredibly painful and cruel practice only necessary because of the mutations we have bred into sheep to get the most wool out of them. Over 50 percent of the world's Merino Wool comes from Australia, where the sheep's wool is extra thick and the climate is extra hot and dry. Their skin is wrinkled and because they're are so fat and live under the hot Australian sun, the skin folds become moist, love nests for flies, who burrow into the folds of the sheep's skin. Maggots then infect the flesh, a condition known as flystrike. The maggots consume the sheep from the inside, leaving the sheep so distressed they stop eating, drinking and can not sleep. Can you blame them? They're being eaten alive by maggots! If untreated, the sheep will die a slow, agonizing death. To avoid the skin folds from being infested, large chunks of skin are cut from the sheep's rear end, which is known as "mulesing." This procedure is done without any anesthesia or painkillers.
And when sheep stop producing wool, they're not sent to pasture, allowed to peacefully utter their last "bah." Instead, when their production value is no longer enough for the wool industry, they're sent to slaughter to benefit the meat industry. Doesn't that make you feel all warm and cozy inside?
The whole theory of sheep "needing" to be sheared is concocted from human design. Natural, wild sheep will grow just enough fur to keep them warm in the winter and cool in the summer. They shed naturally, when necessary. But we have bred sheep to be wool-producing factories. As a result, they do need "haircuts". But these haircuts are not animal-friendly. They are not benevolent favors. They are part of an industry--a machine that is not the "green" solution to fur that clothing designers claim. If you want to look at it purely from an environmental perspective, sheep need food, space and fuel for transportation just like cows and other factory-bred animals. They are livestock, part of a production that pollutes water, emits greenhouse gases and degrades natural resources. In Australia, sheep eat so much natural fauna that wallabies are endangered. And millions of kangaroos searching for food are killed upon invading the herd space.
So if you shun fur, consider yourself an environmentalist or an animal lover, or even if you're a "cute-atarian," someone who doesn't eat anything they deem adorable (and what's cuter than a lamb?), don't pull the wool over your eyes. Wool may not be quite the same as fur, but it's not far off either. Wool is warm, I'll give you that. But there are non-wool alternatives that keep you just as warm during cold winter weather. The choices are out there if you look for them.
We need to be the change we want to see. If we buy non-wool items, people will make non-wool winter clothes. We will find increasingly more materials and more technology that can replace wool, if there's demand for it. Fashion Week may be the puppeteer of the clothing industry, but we don't have to be puppets. Cut the strings. Check labels. The next time you are eco-shopping with your organic pals and scoffing at the fur-wearing hag buying the snakeskin clutch, check the label of that sweater you were eyeing. It may once have been a home for maggots on a sheep's backside." http://www.care2.com/causes/animal-welfare/blog/think-wool-is-a-great-fur-alternative-not-quite/
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 2:42 pm
I'm confused by this article.
The only visible information she's given us is a video on fur farming, which I don't need to watch since I've already exposed myself to them countless times. However, the article is about the cruelty of the wool industry... which she has provided no videos, links, sources, or pictures to. Does she expect to show us a video on fur farming and have us equate it with the wool industry by association? Sorry, calling BS on that.
What else confuses me is the accusations she's making. I'm not saying that what she outlined doesn't occur at all, but I don't understand why this would be common enough to suddenly get so much attention. Why would any producer of wool want their sheep to get wool rot, maggots, heatstroke, or trampled lambs? That doesn't sound like sound business sense to me, it sounds like a serious risk to what makes them money. To me, it appears that these extremes occur a rare moment, and because they are so horrific, they're exaggerated to garner public attention to something that isn't as bad as it seems. She talked about mulesing, but again, has no proof, video, or sources. Why would wool producers want the wool to become dirty, tainted by parasites or insects, or otherwise unproductive? It just doesn't make sense.
I am, however, aware of the docking of tails and castration. I've heard of it in practice before, but I am unsure whether it still occurs now with updated technology and farming practices. Again, another source would be nice.
Our pets have been bred to be so far from their wild ancestors as well as sheep. There's no sense dwelling on this point as it's not changing. You can't change centuries of genetics and whining about it now won't solve anything unless a mass slaughter of all sheep is planned to eliminate the gene pool.
As far as killing the sheep when it's no longer productive, isn't that how the dairy, leather, and egg industry works as well? At least they're not wasting anything like the fur industry does. Not trying to justify it, hell, I don't even wear wool, but come on, now they're just reaching.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:39 pm
Ailinea The only visible information she's given us is a video on fur farming, which I don't need to watch since I've already exposed myself to them countless times. However, the article is about the cruelty of the wool industry... which she has provided no videos, links, sources, or pictures to. Does she expect to show us a video on fur farming and have us equate it with the wool industry by association? Sorry, calling BS on that. I also thought it was odd that she didn't post any wool articles. In fact, I might have questioned her article myself if I hadn't already heard of all these cruelty allegations from many other sources. These are probably not the best sources out there. They're just the ones that came up first when I searched for wool. I believe there is a Humane Society article on it, but I can't find it now. http://www.vegforlife.org/wears_fabric.htm http://www.vegansoapbox.com/almost-100-cruel/ http://www.peta.org/mc/factsheet_display.asp?ID=55 http://www.savethesheep.com/ http://www.elephantjournal.com/2010/01/pulling-the-wool-over-our-eyes-gary-smith/ http://www.unleashed.org.au/change_the_world/go_faux_yourself/wool.php http://www.kidbean.com/why-no-wool.html http://www.thelocal.se/8538/20070918/ http://animal-lib.org.au/news-events/latest-news/129-ban-on-cruel-australian-wool.html Ailinea What else confuses me is the accusations she's making. I'm not saying that what she outlined doesn't occur at all, but I don't understand why this would be common enough to suddenly get so much attention. Why would any producer of wool want their sheep to get wool rot, maggots, heatstroke, or trampled lambs? That doesn't sound like sound business sense to me, it sounds like a serious risk to what makes them money. To me, it appears that these extremes occur a rare moment, and because they are so horrific, they're exaggerated to garner public attention to something that isn't as bad as it seems. She talked about mulesing, but again, has no proof, video, or sources. Why would wool producers want the wool to become dirty, tainted by parasites or insects, or otherwise unproductive? It just doesn't make sense. Farmers often do not take good care of their chickens or dairy cows either. Aside from being immoral it doesn't seem like it would make a ton of sense. You would think better and cleaner conditions would make for better milk and eggs, right? But they usually care more quantity than quality. Dirty conditions are cheaper. And when they're done with the animal, they can kill it for meat. So if we know they do it to every other animal, I don't see why it's so unbelievable that they would do it to sheep. Is dirty wool really less believable than milk with pus in it? Ailinea Our pets have been bred to be so far from their wild ancestors as well as sheep. That certainly doesn't mean it's ok to abuse them just because they're not entirely wild anymore. Ailinea There's no sense dwelling on this point as it's not changing. You can't change centuries of genetics and whining about it now won't solve anything unless a mass slaughter of all sheep is planned to eliminate the gene pool. We don't have to dwell on it. We don't have to kill all the sheep. We just have to stop breeding sheep to be wool factories and stop supporting the wool industry so that this type of cruelty won't be profitable anymore. Once it is not profitable, farmers won't do it. Ailinea As far as killing the sheep when it's no longer productive, isn't that how the dairy, leather, and egg industry works as well? Exactly. And that's why people are against those things. Ailinea At least they're not wasting anything like the fur industry does. Not trying to justify it, hell, I don't even wear wool, but come on, now they're just reaching. Cruelty happens, and people are speak out against it. It doesn't mean they're reaching for something to complain about or collect donations over. It definitely sounds like you're justifying it. It's ok to be skeptical and to ask for more sources. But if you're going to make light of the issue or justify it, that's not right.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 5:23 pm
LorienLlewellyn http://www.vegforlife.org/wears_fabric.htm This one pretty much states the same thing she did with no proof, so unfortunately this doesn't count. sad Quote: http://www.vegansoapbox.com/almost-100-cruel/ Thank you for this link. The video was exactly what I was looking for. It ended on a positive note about eliminating the practice of mulesing though, so this doesn't really contribute to anything that supports the point of the blog... unless I'm misinterpreting it? The sheep are also free-ranging on this video, far from the claims of overcrowding and dirty conditions. Quote: http://www.peta.org/mc/factsheet_display.asp?ID=55 Sorry, I don't accept PETA as a source. Nothing personal, just not reliable. Quote: http://www.savethesheep.com/ Sorry, again, PETA. Quote: http://www.elephantjournal.com/2010/01/pulling-the-wool-over-our-eyes-gary-smith/ Interesting story to this link. I didn't take this blog into much consideration since it's almost an exact copy of the original one, but I went to watch one of the YouTube videos, and when I realized it was a PETA video, stopped it. But then I looked at the related videos and saw something called "Dirty Jobs' Mike Rowe on Lamb Castration, PETA, and American Labor." It's funny how you didn't link to this video, but this one video is what has completely changed my mind on the sheep issue. It's 20 minutes long, but it's the first 12 or 13 that's important. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-udsIV4Hmc&feature=fvwQuote: http://www.unleashed.org.au/change_the_world/go_faux_yourself/wool.php This site provided pictures of the horrible mulesing practice, this is what I was looking for, thank you. I really hope that the first video's claim of eliminating mulesing can only be accurate. Quote: http://www.kidbean.com/why-no-wool.html Not a great source. Quote: http://www.thelocal.se/8538/20070918/ Doesn't say much either. Quote: http://animal-lib.org.au/news-events/latest-news/129-ban-on-cruel-australian-wool.html Funded by PETA, also well known (and sometimes uneducated) extremists. Some good links, but most of them are pretty biased. Quote: Farmers often do not take good care of their chickens or dairy cows either. Aside from being immoral it doesn't seem like it would make a ton of sense. You would think better and cleaner conditions would make for better milk and eggs, right? But they usually care more quantity than quality. Dirty conditions are cheaper. And when they're done with the animal, they can kill it for meat. So if we know they do it to every other animal, I don't see why it's so unbelievable that they would do it to sheep. Is dirty wool really less believable than milk with pus in it? This is true. Same goes for bugs and rat feces in peanut butter, I suppose. I retract my former ignorant statement, thanks. Quote: That certainly doesn't mean it's ok to abuse them just because they're not entirely wild anymore. That isn't what I meant. What I meant is that it's a moot point. Quote: We don't have to dwell on it. We don't have to kill all the sheep. We just have to stop breeding sheep to be wool factories and stop supporting the wool industry so that this type of cruelty won't be profitable anymore. Once it is not profitable, farmers won't do it. Yes, but unfortunately it's much like the meat industry and will probably not stop completely. Of course, that's no excuse not to try, but it's also unrealistic to think it will go away altogether. Quote: Cruelty happens, and people are speak out against it. It doesn't mean they're reaching for something to complain about or collect donations over. It definitely sounds like you're justifying it. It's ok to be skeptical and to ask for more sources. But if you're going to make light of the issue or justify it, that's not right. I think you misunderstood me. I really am not trying to justify it, I don't agree with intentional animal abuse at all (yes, you can call hypocrisy on that one lol). Re-reading what I typed I realized I worded myself very poorly, and I apologize. I'm not trying to make light of it. I ignorantly went off from my own assumptions and what I was given and made a poor judgment on it. What I was saying is that it's not far from the meat industry at all, so garnering special attention specifically because it's wool just seems a little silly to me. I bring up the leather, egg, and dairy industry because the same thing happens every day there. It's just really not a surprise to me or anything. Although, to be honest, I did learn things from this that I did not know before. I don't eat lamb meat, and I don't wear wool anyway, but to those I know that do, the information will be passed on. But because it is so far from the fur industry that it's compared to, I don't expect it to get any special treatment, especially to fellow omnivores. I guess I'm just being negative. Great rebuttal by the way.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 5:53 pm
How about yarn spun from the fur/wool of cared for pets? (I'm unsure how many here knit/crochet...) There are those who actually knit/crochet with dog yarn, cat yarn, then there are the rabbits & other animals which can have their shed fur spun. Technically, even human hair can be turned into yarn. Kind of cool, on that last one...
I find myself really bothered by the idea of buying wool from a company, but if I know someone (as in friends with someone who raises certain animals because they see them as wonderful & beautiful creatures to be around) who doesn't mind hooking me up with the shed fur/wool to have spun, I see no problem with that. It's those 'hidden in the shadows' companies that worry me. With those companies/farms, I say that if the animals are so well taken care of, they need to be more open to letting average people in to take regular tours.
Although, a friend of mine who is NOT concerned with animal rights, but worked w/the health dept said it's because they don't want us to know just how nasty the 'product' is. So yes, a lot of them are horrible with their treatment of the animals. They see them as nothing more than 'product', a means to profit.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:06 pm
I realize that those are not the best sources. I realize that a lot of people don't like PETA. I couldn't find the sources that I really wanted.
Some sheep definitely are free range. But it sounds like free range sheep are sort of like free range cows, they're out there but maybe not the majority.
I heard that Australia was planning on doing away with museling this year. I don't know whether they have yet or not. And it really won't matter much to me. I mean, yes, I will be happy if they they don't do it anymore of course. But the other things that they do to sheep are still bad enough for me to not buy wool.
I agree that it's just like the horrors of the meat industry and doesn't necessarily need special attention. I think what makes it worth pointing out is just the fact that a lot of people don't know about it. A lot of people think all wool is humane, all sheep are free range, all sheep are treated well, etc. So I think people have to hear that it may not be as humane as they are picturing it. Once informed, they can either go about their business, decide not to buy it anymore, or look for humane/free-range suppliers.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:10 pm
goescrunch, I agree. I have no problem with people making yarn out of pretty much anything, as long as it is cruelty-free. For example, some people brush a pet, collect the hair, then make things out of it. Other people make things out of their pet's hair when the pet passes away. Or they'll make things if the animal has to be shaved for surgery, or shaved for the heat, or shaved to remove hair balls, etc.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|