|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 6:29 am
To the one that I serve So what are people's thoughts on Loki? Aside from giving him a slight nod when I honor Odin I don't have much experience with Loki. I'm personally a little nervous about even doing the offerings when I do give them to him. I will give my all
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 2:24 pm
It's odd for me because I didn't have relationship with the other norse gods such as Odin or Freya but rather one of Loki's sons, Fenrir. Now he didn't come to me as a giant wolf, but still. At that time I didn't know anything about Loki other than that he was a trickster god and a villain in the marvel universe. It wasn't till later that Loki became a part of my spiritual life. Yet, he came to me as a father figure, separated from his children and dealt a cruel fate. Though that doesn't stop Loki from doing wrong nor should it make all his crimes negligible. He's not a victim, he's a god, who understand how fate works. To be fearful of him just because it's him, yet not fearful of Thor is weird to me. Why do we fear Loki's tricks and not Thor's anger? Sorry for my ramblings. I just have a lot of feelings over this.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 2:52 pm
howlstar32 It's odd for me because I didn't have relationship with the other norse gods such as Odin or Freya but rather one of Loki's sons, Fenrir. Now he didn't come to me as a giant wolf, but still. Then I don't think it was Fenrir. Fenrir is a wolf, Jormugud is the world serpent, Hel is the Goddess of the underworld and Slepnir is Odin's horse. So how do you know it was Fenrir if he was not as a mighty wolf? howlstar32 At that time I didn't know anything about Loki other than that he was a trickster god and a villain in the marvel universe. I wouldn't say trickster more like chaos. Every chaotic action that Loki has done has while angered the Gods and annoyed them, been for the benefit of change and growth. With out chaos there can be no changes in order and no growth. howlstar32 It wasn't till later that Loki became a part of my spiritual life. Yet, he came to me as a father figure, separated from his children and dealt a cruel fate. He went a step too far with his insults to the other Gods. His children were delt those fates because they were uncontrolable. Loki is a giant from Jotenheim, but is also Odin's blood brother so there is something there. That's why I always hold a toast to Loki when I honor Odin. It was written in the lore to do so and I do my best. howlstar32 Though that doesn't stop Loki from doing wrong nor should it make all his crimes negligible. He's not a victim, he's a god, who understand how fate works. He still went to far. To be fair the Gods also fear him because of his role in Ragnarock. In that Loki will play an essential role in the fall of Odin and Asgard Marvel got right, only it's not the giants he will lead but the dead. Loki is the antithesis of Odin's order and yet they can not exist with out each other. howlstar32 To be fearful of him just because it's him, yet not fearful of Thor is weird to me. Why do we fear Loki's tricks and not Thor's anger? Sorry for my ramblings. I just have a lot of feelings over this. Loki's freedom brings about ragnarock, the end of the Gods and the war between the Gods and the Giants. Only two humans will be spared within Yggdrasil. That's part of it. Though I have to admit I was drawn to the Germanic paths because of a dream I had where Loki was being called and I was the one hiding him.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 5:06 pm
Loki's a bringer of change and while I honor him when I pour for the Wanderer, I don't have many dealings with him. Generally, if he's in your life then you have something to learn. Also, if you're dealing with Fenrir, then be very careful. He is specifically a being of destruction and devastation. He devours all before him. That's why he was bound.
Also this. Top ten misconceptions about Loki. http://web.archive.org/web/20080308004048/http://www.ragnarokr.com/Introductions/top_ten.html
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:36 pm
There was one thing you said that confused me. Quote: He went a step too far with his insults to the other Gods. His children were delt those fates because they were uncontrolable. Loki is a giant from Jotenheim, but is also Odin's blood brother so there is something there. That's why I always hold a toast to Loki when I honor Odin. It was written in the lore to do so and I do my best. Loki' being a giant I feel doesn't factor in this conversation as much with Odin being half giant himself. However Loki's blood combined with Angurboda does result in a very strange way. We see that his children with Sigyn are normal, or unlike their half siblings. Hel's only fault was her looks, half dying and half living. Fenrir was a wolf. Jormungandr was a snake. But I have to ask why you see his children as uncontrollable.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 8:01 pm
Technically, all the Asir were descended from Jotun. Loki no more or less then any other. And Fenrir and Jormundgandr were uncontrollable. That's why Fenrir was bound and Thor was constantly trying to kill Jormundgandr. Fenrir devoured all before him and Jormundgandr just kept growing and growing.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 8:32 pm
But how are they uncontrollable? Growth is different than unable to listen or going against the norms, orders, or society. I know of only two times Thor and Jormungander ever meet. The first is when Thor is out fishing for dinner with the giant Hymir. The next time I know of is when the end is happening, Thor and Jormungander killing each other. Fenrir is chained for his fate, the Norns telling the Æsir that he will kill Odin. But before that Fenrir was seen as just like any wolf. But with the combination of his fate and his growth he was seen as dangerous (though all wolves are dangerous). So, I must ask how one defines uncontrollable in this case?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:15 pm
howlstar32 But how are they uncontrollable? Growth is different than unable to listen or going against the norms, orders, or society. I know of only two times Thor and Jormungander ever meet. The first is when Thor is out fishing for dinner with the giant Hymir. The next time I know of is when the end is happening, Thor and Jormungander killing each other. Fenrir is chained for his fate, the Norns telling the Æsir that he will kill Odin. But before that Fenrir was seen as just like any wolf. But with the combination of his fate and his growth he was seen as dangerous (though all wolves are dangerous). So, I must ask how one defines uncontrollable in this case? Both were growing beyond the Gods ability to contain them which most will fear. I also have some doubts about those Ragnork stories but we'll go into that another time. For reference, in the more traditional Lore, Thor also encountered the serpent in Utgard Loki's hall, though he was unaware of it at the time. There's not a lot more in the works of the Eddas but there's a general undercurrent of Thor's feelings to it throughout. For example, in general he only kills the threats that are actually put in front of him. Sure he goes wandering and is assumed to be dispatching various unfriendly Thurses and Jotun at these times but he's not generally looking for anyone in particular. He just deals with what happens across his path. In the fishing tail you mentioned, he goes out of his way to try and destroy the thing for no reason we are aware of with a panicked and angry giant in the boat with him. He even baits the line specifically for it. You don't think such grand bait as that was for just any catch do you? This doesn't imply friendship, but rather a certain amount of obsession with killing it. Also, when the Gods first tossed it into the ocean, they may have been trying to kill it. It's hard to say. As to Fenrir, wolves are almost uniformly powers of destruction and death in Norse mythology. Even the names of Odinn's wolves (Geri and Freki) both mean ravenous and they are known for eating the corpses of the battle dead. Also, depending on which version you reference either Fenrir or two wolves that he fathered will devour the sun and the moon. And Fenrir wasn't just prophecied to kill Odinn, but also to ravage the world of men. Even before that, he was so large and fierce that the only God willing to get close enough to feed him was Tyr. Jormundgandr and Fenrir are inherently forces of destruction and of the end of things. It's their purpose and their nature. I'm not saying that's entirely bad, as ending are needed for there to be room for new beginnings. However, they are not kind and they are not to be mucked about with.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:36 pm
I don't understand Ragnarok...
While to the people of this time it makes sense to have an ending to the gods and the birth of a new world, I don't understand it in the context of how it plays for the gods. They knew what was going to happen, the signs to when it would begin, the key players and the end, but I don't see how that works. If they new that there would be an end, then whatever. But to know so much seems so weird. You bring up Thor's obsession with killing Jurmundgandr, yet wouldn't that be because he knew of how they would kill each other because of the fear he may have held that such a large creature would be the one to end it and his hope that if he killed him before the end it would change fate. And by knowing it, and maybe even changing it wouldn't they just be accomplishing a fate anyway.
How could one function in such a reality. It makes me think of Oedipus and his fate. He ran to try not to fulfill the prophecy yet ends up doing so anyway. By having the gods know are the forcing the events to happen... And in that case, a god like Loki, who courts chaos like a lover, who finds joy in tricks and riddles, would see this reality as a chance to do whatever because no matter what happens this is going to be the fate and his place will be against the Aesir. Yet... why like this. Why Loki vs Odin, blood brother for so long, maybe even before the Aesir/Vanir war. Ok so Loki had some very crazy kids, maybe we should watch them to make sure nothing bad happens. Oh, Baldr is dead, yet he knew he was going to die. Yet when everything is over he comes back to life and so does the brother that killed him...
Sorry for my rambles.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 10:26 am
howlstar32 I don't understand Ragnarok... While to the people of this time it makes sense to have an ending to the gods and the birth of a new world, I don't understand it in the context of how it plays for the gods. They knew what was going to happen, the signs to when it would begin, the key players and the end, but I don't see how that works. If they new that there would be an end, then whatever. But to know so much seems so weird. You bring up Thor's obsession with killing Jurmundgandr, yet wouldn't that be because he knew of how they would kill each other because of the fear he may have held that such a large creature would be the one to end it and his hope that if he killed him before the end it would change fate. And by knowing it, and maybe even changing it wouldn't they just be accomplishing a fate anyway. How could one function in such a reality. It makes me think of Oedipus and his fate. He ran to try not to fulfill the prophecy yet ends up doing so anyway. By having the gods know are the forcing the events to happen... And in that case, a god like Loki, who courts chaos like a lover, who finds joy in tricks and riddles, would see this reality as a chance to do whatever because no matter what happens this is going to be the fate and his place will be against the Aesir. Yet... why like this. Why Loki vs Odin, blood brother for so long, maybe even before the Aesir/Vanir war. Ok so Loki had some very crazy kids, maybe we should watch them to make sure nothing bad happens. Oh, Baldr is dead, yet he knew he was going to die. Yet when everything is over he comes back to life and so does the brother that killed him... Sorry for my rambles. I personally adhere to the UPG idea that the Loki who is bound in the Earth and who will play such a role in the Ragnarok is Utgard Loki. I also believe that Loki is Odinn's actual brother (under several other names) and not only his blood brother. Read the link I posted earlier for more on some of this. A lot of Snorri's version of the Baldr story just doesn't read for me. Makes no sense in the context. Also, Loki doesn't court chaos and he's not just out to cause s**t. He distrupts the established order but more in a manner of avoiding stagnation then in a chaotic way. Everything he does has a certain sense and logic to it. He's a bringer of change and often benefit and he will damn well finish what he starts. He'll follow it through to the end, no matter where that ending takes him. I'll deal the with the Ragnarok discussion elsewhere.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 1:52 pm
howlstar32 Loki' being a giant I feel doesn't factor in this conversation as much with Odin being half giant himself. In some ways it does as Loki seems to have more allies in the realm of the Jotun than he does in the realm of the Aesir. At least that's been my impression. He also seems to spend more time there than any other deity. Thor travels there a-lot, but he doesn't seem to live there like Loki does. Odin doesn't seem to display the trickster and challenger aspects of his Jotun heritage as much as Loki does. Yes they both are tricksters and magicians, but Loki seems to relish more in trickery and deception than Odin. Only Loki could convince Thor to dress up as Freya (that's actually one of my favorite Loki and Thor tales). howlstar32 However Loki's blood combined with Angurboda does result in a very strange way. One who is half dead and half alive, One who is a giant snake, and one who is a wolf that can not stop growing and will father the ones who swallow the sun and moon. Yeah those are strange. My favorite child of Loki though is Slepinir. Gotta love and 8 legged horse that belongs to the All Father. howlstar32 We see that his children with Sigyn are normal, or unlike their half siblings. Who are Loki's children with his wife? howlstar32 Hel's only fault was her looks, half dying and half living. My experiences with her have her being beautiful in both states. One has the rosy completion of life and the other has the white purity of death and darkness which holds the mysteries of death. For me Hel actually embodies exactly what the Underworld is about and what death actually means. Its beautiful, elegant, and fearful all at once, which is why I love her. Who grew so powerful only Tyr could feed him. I actually see the true meaing of Tyr's sacrifice these days when I look at everything my fiance sacrificed to provide a home and a life for me. It's one of the reason Tyr is his patron God. I see him as the reason there are so many tales of deadly and powerful sea serpents that if you gain their wrath will destroy you. He is so large that he is encircling himself and has started to swallow his own body. I have a relationship with him, but it's not in the same as when I say I have a relationship with Odin and Frigga. howlstar32 But I have to ask why you see his children as uncontrollable. The lore describes them as such which is why they were given the fates they have. They were beyond the abilities of the Gods to contain without those drastic measures, though I do agree with you about Hel. She at least gets to rule her own realm.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 2:08 pm
CalledTheRaven Technically, all the Asir were descended from Jotun. Loki no more or less then any other. That is true. All of the deities (and I hold to the belief that the Jotun like the Vanir are simply another "tribe" of Germanic Gods. CalledTheRaven And Fenrir and Jormundgandr were uncontrollable. That's why Fenrir was bound and Thor was constantly trying to kill Jormundgandr. Fenrir devoured all before him and Jormundgandr just kept growing and growing. I thought there were actual lines in the Poetic Edda that used phrasing like that..I could be wrong though.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 2:48 pm
CalledTheRaven Loki's a bringer of change I have to agree. Every action that Loki has done has caused change of some sort, and useually that change is productive and for the better, even if the means are sometimes questionable in the eyes of the other Gods. CalledTheRaven and while I honor him when I pour for the Wanderer, I don't have many dealings with him. It makes sense that if you are honoring Thor and his travels you'd honor his favorite traveling companion. I've found that the majority of the myths involving the Thunderer's travels involve Loki. CalledTheRaven Generally, if he's in your life then you have something to learn. I also associate Loki with laughter. In some ways through Lokesanna (sp?) he teaches us to laugh at our selves and our faults, to admit where we are weak and to work on it. That's what I always got out of those taunts. His actions with the Giants Stallion allowed the Aesir to win their wager and thus change was brought. While he was the reason Freya lost her necklace to a Jotun, he was also the one to bring it back. Every thing he does he typically undos. He causes change, but not with out risk. He is the catalyst for change and as such is also the bringer of order in some ways. CalledTheRaven Also, if you're dealing with Fenrir, then be very careful. He is specifically a being of destruction and devastation. He devours all before him. That's why he was bound. It also seems he was smarter than the Gods believed him to be, because his final binding was enchanted and he knew it. That's why he made the Aesir swear an oath that there was no enchantment or trickery. That's why Tyr sacrificed his arm and is in many way the God of meaningful self Sacrifice. CalledTheRaven Also this. Top ten misconceptions about Loki. http://web.archive.org/web/20080308004048/http://www.ragnarokr.com/Introductions/top_ten.html Thanks for the link. I'll have to read it and check it out.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 2:57 pm
How does Fenrir father the wolves (Skoll and Hati) that eat the sun and moon? I read that their were descended from the Iarnvidiur (troll-wives/giantesses). I mean he could be but I didn't know that...
He had two children with his wife, Vali and Narfi. One is turned into a wolf and kills the other brother. The dead brother's intestines are used to chain Loki to the rock... I forget what happened to the other brother, if he was killed or died of grief...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:05 pm
Loona Wynd It makes sense that if you are honoring Thor and his travels you'd honor his favorite traveling companion. You misunderstand. When I said the Wanderer, I was referring to Odinn. The Wanderer is one of Odinn's many kennings. And the Gods didn't really think Fenrir was stupid, just dangerous. Of course he was suspicious of that last cord. They'd already tried to bind him twice. Only a fool would think it was just a game. Tyr knew he would lose his hand for the lie but he also knew it had to be done. And howlstar, parentage can be a funny thing. Notice I also mentioned that there are even versions where it is Fenrir himself who devours the Sun and Moon, though not versions I'm terribly familiar with. I'm also not well versed in the origins of Skoll and Hati but that's one of the variants I've come across. Actually a lot of the lore can be confusing because in many cases, there are more then one version of a story. It's all about who your source is and how you interpret it. For example, there's several more versions of the Baldr myth then the one most know from Snorri. And they're all quite different from each other. And you last paragraph is in reference to what? I know it's about Loki, though it took me a moment as you had no transition, but what is it in response to? By the way, in Scandinavian folklore Loki is also thought to have given birth to a number of children by humans. Yes he was a woman at the time. It was thing he did.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|