Welcome to Gaia! ::

Thats really hard to say nowadays since most wrestlers use "ground and pound" against the jiu jitsu guard. If a jiu jitsu fighter is active in their guard, the wrestler dosent stand a chance, but if the wrestler postures up then its the other way around.

wrestling 100% no offense to any jiu jitsu fighters but wrestlers are more dedicated and ..i cant think of the word....but i guess you could say somthing along the lines of rough, not the word i was looking for but close enough. but yea jiu jitsu isnt easy but wrestling practices and matches, in my opinion. are alot harder.

That's a no brainier it's jujitsu, it uses submission holds.. i should know that since i did four years of wrestling...but idk i seen some sick wrestler moves that are sick.. there like this its from style of wrestle that's combine with jujitsu here ti goes

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elBp1wLI8Ic&playnext_from=TL&videos=V-eT9TaQXFo so idk:

As with so many other style matchups, it boils down largely to technique. Krav maga borrows heavily from both styles for its takedowns and ground format. As always, the equivalency of the practitioners is in question. On a basis of equal level of training, there is no real way to say which style wins. Let us assume a generic sort of wrestling for the purposes of this model of the type you might see in early MMA training.

The venue becomes more important if all other factors (training, conditioning) are equal. Honestly, in a format where submissions and careful tactical thought are a must (such as an MMA match or a submission exposition) one must give the edge to jiu-jitsu.

Contrarily, in a situation where instinct and powerful ground striking are more useful (a street fight, a law enforcement situation) one must give the advantage to a wrestling form.

Realistically, with the rise of MMA as a valid and effective way of embracing the martial arts, both jiu-jitsu and wrestling are becoming more and more prevalent. Each has its own pros and cons, and there are too many factors in a given fight to predict exactly who will win when all things are equal. Asked my personal preference, I would suggest wrestling but I am severely biased due to training and physical size, as well as my limited exposure to jiu-jitsu.

I a battle of catch wrestling and jiu-jitsu ... I think it would be more about patience and looking position (both offensive and defensive) ...

Hard to say ... both have strengths ... wrestling you have takedowns, takedown defense, and cardio/conditioning ... while jiu-jitsu has all the submissions to end a fight ... so it depends ... is this a grinder or a quick finish ... either way ... for me ... I'm not sure who would win ...

personally, its jitsu all the way. I'm all for the fact that wrestlers can have advantages and can to some degrees take out people who use jiu-jitsu, but i've heard from a few minor MMA fighters who first started with wrestling, and then changed over to Jiu-jitsu because of better advantages. Does it always work yes. Does it some times fail, yes. It depends on how the people is trained, how far, and how well they use it.

Also, Superman, anyone whos trained in jiu-jitsu is trained to fight as well as receive extensive training and can be just as dedicated to their training as wrestlers. Again it depends on the person, and how much time they can give. I'm not saying your not right, to some degree wrestlers are more agressive, but sometimes in my opinion, agressiveness is a down fall.