Welcome to Gaia! ::

Pen on Fire.

Back to Guilds

A writer's guild. 

Tags: Writing, critique, prizes, workshop, lessons 

Reply General Discussion
Dear Guild:

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Punk Fox TH
Crew

Man-Hungry Conversationalist

8,300 Points
  • Beta Citizen 0
  • Elocutionist 200
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 10:31 pm


Hi, folks, I know I rarely get formal with the guild at large, bad for my image or something, but there's something going down here in the USA that is really bothering me. Now, this thread is directed at Americans, though anyone should understand.

My mother owns a small business, a web store selling baby wearing and 'natural parenting' options. She's also setting herself up to become one of the forefront names in the baby wearing industry. Now, the bad news:

The Consumer Product Safety Commission, as of 2008, was given increased authority to protect children through the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act. This bill, just for those who don't know, set some strict standards as to how much of certain known hazardous materials, such as lead, could be included in children products. It also presented some other far reaching powers including provable safety in children products.

The law is in fact a fairly good idea, encouraging improvement of products overall, especially when children are involved. The problems with it, though, are a bigger worry. The first problem is that the bill left definition of 'children's product' up to the CPSA. There is not a clear definition, and in fact, the CPSA voted recently to expand the number of products covered by the bill. The second issue is that now, products covered by the CPSIA have to pass HIGHER standards than what was already required. For example, even if a company purchases materials from companies that have already tested and proven their products safe for lead levels, the final product must be tested AGAIN for the same thing. A number of foreign companies have pulled out of the market completely instead of trying to deal with the CPSA's rules.

And where it hits home. The CPSA has been using bully tactics against certain members of the baby wearing community. Link This is the subject I was intending to write about at the beginning of the week. Someone else beat me to the punch with a very eloquent blog post, and I set it aside to focus on my school work. But today, there was a recall from the CPSA, with no details, but there were no injuries due to the product, and the only hazard would come from misuse of the product. Is this really what the CPSA is for? To protect us from ourselves?

My plea to Americans is this: Write to your Senators. Write to your Representative. Write to the Commissioners of the CPSA. Demand that the CPSA do its job of protecting us from companies releasing faulty and dangerous products, NOT protecting citizens from their own poor choices.
PostPosted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 12:14 am


The CPSC has a longstanding tradition of stupidity. They officially class bicycles as children's toys. A bicycle cannot be legally sold without reflectors on the pedals. That's right, even the high end ones. Which is why, at the bike store I used to work at, the mid-high end pedals would get their reflectors removed after the customers paid and were headed out the door; they were potentially dangerous if they stayed on. But yeah, they're classed as children's toys, which is one of their stupider moves.

Unless you're a bike geek, it probably seems pretty trivial. But, really, do these two images belong governed by the same regulations?
User Image - Blocked by "Display Image" Settings. Click to show.image too huge, but sparkly


Really sucks that your mom's industry is being affected. They do mean well, but . ..

phantomkitsune
Crew

Dangerous Enabler


Punk Fox TH
Crew

Man-Hungry Conversationalist

8,300 Points
  • Beta Citizen 0
  • Elocutionist 200
PostPosted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 4:35 am


phantomkitsune
The CPSC has a longstanding tradition of stupidity. They officially class bicycles as children's toys. A bicycle cannot be legally sold without reflectors on the pedals. That's right, even the high end ones. Which is why, at the bike store I used to work at, the mid-high end pedals would get their reflectors removed after the customers paid and were headed out the door; they were potentially dangerous if they stayed on. But yeah, they're classed as children's toys, which is one of their stupider moves.

Unless you're a bike geek, it probably seems pretty trivial. But, really, do these two images belong governed by the same regulations?
User Image - Blocked by "Display Image" Settings. Click to show.image too huge, but sparkly


Really sucks that your mom's industry is being affected. They do mean well, but . ..


While researching the CPSIA, one of the products affected by the overall lead level requirement: motor vehicles, namely offroad bikes, ATVs, and such. Ones meant for children were going to need to be removed from the market for their lead level, forcing kids to use equipment too large for them. So yeah. . . for each piece of good. . .
PostPosted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 3:06 pm


I'm about too furious to speak. I hate it when I see the government stepping in on causes that need no intervention, and sitting around on their asses and letting rights - like the ADA - be trampled all over.

I'm glad you're passionate about this Fox. I'll see to writing a letter.

Kiddo Seanchain

Shirtless Heckler


Miss Shelock Holmes

Fashionable Lover

8,700 Points
  • Pet Lover 100
  • Invisibility 100
  • Nudist Colony 200
PostPosted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:44 pm


So, let me get this straight...the government has recalled a product that only if misused could cause harm? Well, they have good intentions, but still that's just plain stupid!
PostPosted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 6:44 pm


Miss Shelock Holmes
So, let me get this straight...the government has recalled a product that only if misused could cause harm? Well, they have good intentions, but still that's just plain stupid!


This is not the only product they've threatened this type of recall on.

Ring slings, a type of baby carrier, are under hard scrutiny even with hard evidence proving their BENEFIT when used properly.

But I don't have enough functional evidence to support that, but I've seen it since my mother shows me most of it.

Punk Fox TH
Crew

Man-Hungry Conversationalist

8,300 Points
  • Beta Citizen 0
  • Elocutionist 200

Miss Shelock Holmes

Fashionable Lover

8,700 Points
  • Pet Lover 100
  • Invisibility 100
  • Nudist Colony 200
PostPosted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 4:57 am


Punk Fox TH
Miss Shelock Holmes
So, let me get this straight...the government has recalled a product that only if misused could cause harm? Well, they have good intentions, but still that's just plain stupid!


This is not the only product they've threatened this type of recall on.

Ring slings, a type of baby carrier, are under hard scrutiny even with hard evidence proving their BENEFIT when used properly.

But I don't have enough functional evidence to support that, but I've seen it since my mother shows me most of it.


-facepalms-
Reply
General Discussion

 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum