|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 7:25 pm
With the Recent Bustle about New Years and the Gambino Fire on Halloween, there have many speculations on whether on not Ian was guilty or innocent?
Any thoughts in general?
If guilty, what do you think should happen to him?
If innocent, who started the fire?
Your thoughts biggrin
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 7:32 pm
One I think G-corp and Gambino were behind the fire. I think Gambino killed his son and took his place. (Notice the new long hair!) But this theories based of the twisted sick morbid staff we luv so much. heart Two obviously Ian is innocent and three your obsessed with Ice cream sundaes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 7:40 pm
I love Ian xDDD
And Ice Cream Sundaes xDDD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 7:47 pm
Ian has to be innocent. I read the trail as open-minded as possible and I really don't see much of a way he could be guilty.
I just wish the admins would clear up everything about Labtech X, the pills, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:01 pm
eXdreamer Ian has to be innocent. I read the trail as open-minded as possible and I really don't see much of a way he could be guilty. I just wish the admins would clear up everything about Labtech X, the pills, etc. Ian is innocent. There's no question about that. I think Rufus may have something to do with the fire. I mean, if you look at Barton Boutique, he is way to happy to be innocent. ninja If they cleared everything up about Labtech X and everything though... there would be no plot. And no point for future events and such. I mean, there will be no mystery to unravel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:04 pm
That is true, but I'm sure the admins would think up new things. I don't expcet all the mysteries to be solved right away, after all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:05 pm
eXdreamer That is true, but I'm sure the admins would think up new things. I don't expcet all the mysteries to be solved right away, after all. yuh, that would be boring. Although I DO want to know who started the fire. As strange as Rufus or Johnny k are...who knows, it could be believable. I mean, the pills, could that be Johnny making himself look younger?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:15 pm
If Gino is really Johnny K, where is Gino Gambino then? Ahh! So many questions have arisen!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:17 pm
lunar_beam If Gino is really Johnny K, where is Gino Gambino then? Ahh! So many questions have arisen!! Well Mockary gave the idea that Johnny killed Gino. Which could theorectically be true 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:21 pm
But where are the Von Helsons and who shot Gambino? gonk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:29 pm
But why would Johnny kill Gino? He was his son. I hope I don't have a father like that.
And didn't the Von Helson's have died from their masion/house/whatever collapsing on them?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:49 pm
No bodies were found! Johnny is known for his badness! Gino was innocent! Makes sense to take his place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 10:04 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 10:25 pm
I think Bucho did it, in his questioning the security video ad a second long gap in it, and his skin tone and knuckle size are the same as the giant behind the scientist during grunny invasion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 11:02 pm
Ian is definately innocent, he's too much of a nice guy. And that's also the reason why I think he should get Sasha out of his head, she's too dimwitted and... kinda slutty. He deserves better, being the nice guy that he is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![[-Interesting Indeed-]'s avatar](https://a1cdn.gaiaonline.com/dress-up/avatar/ava/9f/c2/61570e20cc29f_flip.png?t=1463697265_6.00_01)
