Welcome to Gaia! ::

Jesus Christ for Life

Back to Guilds

Jesus Christ for life. Everthing else fades away 

Tags: Jesus, Christ, Life, Prayer, Praise 

Reply Jesus Christ for Life
question about Bibles

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

WoodSorrelWitch

PostPosted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 1:58 pm


Why is it that not all Bibles share the same books within them?
One Bible that I have has book in it that my other Bibles do not have.

Why is that so? Which is the correct Word of God? Which one should I follow?
PostPosted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 6:05 pm


~There are different translations, but I don't know if I've ever seen a Bible that doesn't have the same Books within it. Is the extra "book" called the Apocrypha? Some Bibles include it, even though they are not considered to be part of the Canon, or the books that were originally approved to be included in the Bible. So you know where that particular one came from? Name some of the Books that are different. That would help.

~And for me the translation that I love more than any others is the King James Version. In a lot of the other translations there are words that are changed or even left out, for instance the name Jesus is not mentioned as many times in any other version.

Felina75
Captain

Cheery Conversationalist


The_Servant_Grey

PostPosted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:07 pm


PawzPrint
Why is it that not all Bibles share the same books within them?
One Bible that I have has book in it that my other Bibles do not have.

Why is that so? Which is the correct Word of God? Which one should I follow?


Different denominations of Christianity include gnostic, apocryphal, and deuturo-canon books that were never originally included in the early writings of the Church for their own personal reasons.The biggest most apparent example is the difference between catholic and protestant Bibles. At least 7 Apocryphal books are included in the catholic Bible - which among many different groups is not universally accepted in the catholic church.

By order of historicity, the original books in the early church (Old+New Testament) were:

[Old Testament]

Pentateuch - Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy

Historical Books - Joshua, Judges, Ruth, First Samuel, Second Samuel, First Kings, Second Kings, First Chronicles, Second Chronicles, Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther

Poetical - Job, Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon

Prophetical - Isaiah, Jeremiah, Lamentations, Ezekiel, Daniel, Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi

[New Testament]

Historical Books - Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Acts

Pauline Epistles - Romans, 1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, 1 Thessalonians, 2 Thessalonians. 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy, Titus, Philemon

Non-Pauline Epistles - Hebrews, James, 1 Peter, 2 Peter, 1 John, 2 John, 3 John, Jude

Apocalyptic Literature - Revelation (or also otherwise considered a Non-Pauline Epistle)

These books are the Scriptural Canon of the Bible. The other types of books I listed at the beginning are not widely accepted and do not hold up under the test of scriptural scrutiny used by the early church.
PostPosted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 10:34 pm


For me, I would like to follow the King James version. Since in the other translations, alot of verses have been removed and removed the name Jesus in some of its pages. It did also remove some of the words.

If I remember correctly, it stated in the bible that Man cannot edit the contents of it, nor add or minus. I am not saying that King James Version is the real one, since I am also confused, but I would like the others to also speak out their mind. King James Version is also said to be the oldest version of Bible.

Its the Old King James Version not the New King James Version, since the new one is also edited like the other ones.

But aww... I don't have King James Bible...only NIV. ^^
I wish to get one though. and, I also noticed some changes in the passages, can't remember what are those though... : )

xinixane

4,750 Points
  • Hygienic 200
  • Treasure Hunter 100

SARL0
Vice Captain

Quotable Dabbler

PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2010 3:08 am


I prefer the King James Version of the Bible.
No other version speaks to my spirit the way the KJV does.
other versions seem "dead" to me, as if i were reading from a newspaper or a magazine.
It is as if the KJV is alive - i dont know how else to explain it. razz

HERE is a pretty in depth research about the Bible along with thorough explanations about the other books and their exclusion from the Bible. Once you're at the article, scroll down and you'll find that paragraphs (d), (e), and (f) deal w/ the missing books that you are asking about.

razz
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:24 pm


History of the Bible

You should read this. It will answer some of the questions you have. smile

Garland-Green

Friendly Gaian


Maverick Lightblade

7,100 Points
  • Citizen 200
  • Autobiographer 200
  • Person of Interest 200
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 4:14 pm


Praise the Lord! Finally I find people who agree with me. Even in my church I get snapped at and told to be quiet because I speak out against other translations. The King James Version(the real one not the New KJV) is the one and only correct English translation Bible there is. All other English translations are corrupt; they have had passages added and taken out, even going so far in many as to deny the Divine nature of Jesus. The KJV is 3/4ths Tyndale and the rest is from the Masoretic texts(being a line of priests dedicated to preserving the exact word for word copying of the original hand written Scriptures). Other translations use the Alexandrian and Western texts, which both deny Christ and disagree with several other important points. The other translations also use parts of the Westcott and Hort Bible, which was extremely inaccurate. That translation used the Alexandrian line of texts as well as the "newly uncovered" Sinaiticus and Vaticanus texts(named for where they were found- Mt Sinai and the Vatican)... supposed "holy writings" that not only disagree with themselves, but with each other in well over 600 places. The KJV is also actually EASIER to read then other translations, using fewer number of words and phrases. I also choose only the KJV for the same reason that SARL0 mentioned, it speaks to the spirit in ways no other translation every could; and the "Holy use" words as I like to call them(the thee's and thou's and such) make the mind think on what is said more, and the heart and spirit gain more from it.

A very long-winded explanation to just say "King James Version is awesome and you should only use it!", but at least now you know WHY its the best lol
Reply
Jesus Christ for Life

 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum