|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 9:54 pm
Disney Sequels:
A drawn out, lesser version of the original?
or
A great continuation of a story?
Disney has made many sequels over the years, Cinderella, Ariel, Pocohantas, The Swan Princess, ect but were these sequels really necessary? Or do you think they're just a ploy from Disney to try to make more money off a movie idea that did really well?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 3:45 pm
I think it depends on the way disney has the story protrayed; for example in both continuing stories of ariel and pocahontas, the stories of told of what would happen next; like ariel for instance she has a daughter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 10:11 am
cat0120 I think it depends on the way disney has the story protrayed; for example in both continuing stories of ariel and pocahontas, the stories of told of what would happen next; like ariel for instance she has a daughter. I agree with this. Though, I feel that a lot of them are money schemes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2011 9:46 am
cat0120 I think it depends on the way disney has the story protrayed; for example in both continuing stories of ariel and pocahontas, the stories of told of what would happen next; like ariel for instance she has a daughter. i totally agree with you as long as they keep the same story going!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
