|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 8:06 pm
Fred's extensive experience in politics and governmental affairs has spanned over 35 years. As a partner of the Dolphin Group, Fred managed numerous federal, state and local campaigns. He ran several successful opposition campaigns, including heavy involvement in three Presidential races.
In 2006 Karger founded Save the Boom!!! a grassroots campaign to save the oldest gay bar in the Western United States, the landmark Boom Boom Room and Coast Inn in Laguna Beach, California. This got Fred active in LGBTQ politics, and was the natural precursor to his starting Californians Against Hate Californians Against Hate was created to bring public attention to the major donors to the Yes on Proposition 8 campaign. Fred organized boycotts against four mega-donors to Proposition 8, two were settled and two are ongoing. Proposition 8 passed in a very close election on November 4, 2008, and ended gay marriage in California. Right after the election, Fred filed a sworn complaint against the Mormon Church with the California Fair Political Practices Commission for possible illegal campaign activities surrounding its massive involvement in Proposition 8. That led to a 19 month investigation, culminating in a 13 count guilty finding against the Salt Lake City based Church.
Fred filed a similar complaint with the Maine Ethics Commission against the infamous National Organization for Marriage, alleging money laundering and reporting irregularities in that state's November 2009 election to repeal its marriage equality law. That investigation is ongoing. On April 10, 2010 at a press conference at the Southern Republican Leadership Conference in New Orleans, Fred announced that he was seriously considering running for President in 2012 as an Independent Republican. He would be the first openly gay candidate to run for President of the United States. Since his announcement Fred has traveled extensively throughout the country, with repeated visits to Iowa and New Hampshire, home to the first caucuses and primary in the nation.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 9:00 pm
This is the first I've ever heard of him, and usually I know a lot about Republicans being that I am one, but unfortunately for him, Mitt Romney has my vote. Karger still sounds impressive though. I'll have to research him some more. 3nodding
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 9:43 pm
kh.ikari This is the first I've ever heard of him, and usually I know a lot about Republicans being that I am one, but unfortunately for him, Mitt Romney has my vote. Karger still sounds impressive though. I'll have to research him some more. 3nodding In my opinion, as long as they don't end up debating with each other in the primaries, they both have a decent chance of success. Oh, and I apologize for that incident in the dirty roses guild. It was mostly due to a misinterpretation on how people debated.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 10:45 pm
Shilberu Erikku kh.ikari This is the first I've ever heard of him, and usually I know a lot about Republicans being that I am one, but unfortunately for him, Mitt Romney has my vote. Karger still sounds impressive though. I'll have to research him some more. 3nodding In my opinion, as long as they don't end up debating with each other in the primaries, they both have a decent chance of success. Oh, and I apologize for that incident in the dirty roses guild. It was mostly due to a misinterpretation on how people debated. It's unavoidable not to debate in the primaries. It's the point of the primaries after all. I did however, like that in the first debate in South Carolina, that the candidates attacked Obama and his policies and not each other. We don't really need Republicans attacking Republicans. Like the quote in my signature says, "Eritis insuperabiles, si fueritis inseparabiles." (You would be insuperable if you were inseparable.). If the party stands together, then we can defeat Obama in 2012. I don't know much about Karger yet, but I do know, that Romney scores well in the polls, even beating Obama or have him tied with with him in most. Both Karger and Romney face the same problems though, being moderates. Both will lose badly in the South Carolina and Iowa primaries because those are dominated by social conservatives. My state is the same way. In the 2008 primary, McCain got 50%, while the staunch social conservative Huckabee got 40%. Romney only got 3%, so my vote won't matter too much unfortunately. And it's alright. I understand.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 11:24 pm
kh.ikari Shilberu Erikku kh.ikari This is the first I've ever heard of him, and usually I know a lot about Republicans being that I am one, but unfortunately for him, Mitt Romney has my vote. Karger still sounds impressive though. I'll have to research him some more. 3nodding In my opinion, as long as they don't end up debating with each other in the primaries, they both have a decent chance of success. Oh, and I apologize for that incident in the dirty roses guild. It was mostly due to a misinterpretation on how people debated. It's unavoidable not to debate in the primaries. It's the point of the primaries after all. I did however, like that in the first debate in South Carolina, that the candidates attacked Obama and his policies and not each other. We don't really need Republicans attacking Republicans. Like the quote in my signature says, "Eritis insuperabiles, si fueritis inseparabiles." (You would be insuperable if you were inseparable.). If the party stands together, then we can defeat Obama in 2012. I don't know much about Karger yet, but I do know, that Romney scores well in the polls, even beating Obama or have him tied with with him in most. Both Karger and Romney face the same problems though, being moderates. Both will lose badly in the South Carolina and Iowa primaries because those are dominated by social conservatives. My state is the same way. In the 2008 primary, McCain got 50%, while the staunchly social conservative Huckabee got 40%. Romney only got 3%, so my vote won't matter too much unfortunately. And it's alright. I understand.I was talking about the tension that would arise between each other on a debate on same-sex marriage causing a bit of a stir, as it could very well just lead to a much more childish debate than Biden/Palin and flush both their campaigns down the toilet.But then again, I could just be thinking of the worse case scenario, as they don't really have that much to get heated over, them being both moderates and all, but there's still a slight chance that could happen. sweatdrop
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 12:55 am
Shilberu Erikku kh.ikari Shilberu Erikku kh.ikari This is the first I've ever heard of him, and usually I know a lot about Republicans being that I am one, but unfortunately for him, Mitt Romney has my vote. Karger still sounds impressive though. I'll have to research him some more. 3nodding In my opinion, as long as they don't end up debating with each other in the primaries, they both have a decent chance of success. Oh, and I apologize for that incident in the dirty roses guild. It was mostly due to a misinterpretation on how people debated. It's unavoidable not to debate in the primaries. It's the point of the primaries after all. I did however, like that in the first debate in South Carolina, that the candidates attacked Obama and his policies and not each other. We don't really need Republicans attacking Republicans. Like the quote in my signature says, "Eritis insuperabiles, si fueritis inseparabiles." (You would be insuperable if you were inseparable.). If the party stands together, then we can defeat Obama in 2012. I don't know much about Karger yet, but I do know, that Romney scores well in the polls, even beating Obama or have him tied with with him in most. Both Karger and Romney face the same problems though, being moderates. Both will lose badly in the South Carolina and Iowa primaries because those are dominated by social conservatives. My state is the same way. In the 2008 primary, McCain got 50%, while the staunchly social conservative Huckabee got 40%. Romney only got 3%, so my vote won't matter too much unfortunately. And it's alright. I understand.I was talking about the tension that would arise between each other on a debate on same-sex marriage causing a bit of a stir, as it could very well just lead to a much more childish debate than Biden/Palin and flush both their campaigns down the toilet.But then again, I could just be thinking of the worse case scenario, as they don't really have that much to get heated over, them being both moderates and all, but there's still a slight chance that could happen. sweatdrop Oh. Well I think personally, it would be best if none of the Republican candidates bring up same-sex marriage. It's too controversial an issue, especially with the Republican base. I say, stick to the economy because it's what's most important. It's the issue my side can use to win in 2012. Well there is some truth to that. Technically, both Biden and Palin did ruin their political careers. Majorities of voters say both are not fit to be president. It is possible, but as moderates, they will avoid those kinds of issues and focus on their strong points. The worst thing for moderates, is social issues. It can sink a candidate. Romney's Mormonism sunk him with social conservatives in 2008. I still worry about the voters purifying the field and nominating an electable candidate like Palin. We in the conservative base love her, but know she's got too much baggage to be a real candidate. I personally don't mind a moderate. I'm a staunch fiscal conservative, but more of a moderate on social issues.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|