|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Feb 19, 2006 12:14 am
wat would make the world want to kill themself because the ____ is terrable...
i beileve i should write a book about this topic...
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 19, 2006 12:46 am
would a mutated dog with rabit feet and bear claws be cool??? like a giant dog...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 4:07 am
Bush somehow getting a third term in office.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 9:11 pm
Phoney Bone Bush somehow getting a third term in office. hell its possible with how he is wanting to change the constitution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The_Wicked_Man Vice Captain
|
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:40 am
Kadargo Phoney Bone Bush somehow getting a third term in office. hell its possible with how he is wanting to change the constitution. Desiring to ban gay marriage is not the same as desiring to repeal or alter the 22nd Amendment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 6:35 pm
...Which he tried to do, but it was denied. That doesn't mean that he won't use his emergency wartime powers to cancel the next elections.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The_Wicked_Man Vice Captain
|
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:47 pm
Phoney Bone ...Which he tried to do, but it was denied. That doesn't mean that he won't use his emergency wartime powers to cancel the next elections. I'm fairly certain that instituting martial law to make sure friendly civilians come nowhere near a high school on Election Day is not the reason why the President was given "emergency wartime powers," not to mention that for an American President to order the military to attack the very people they swore to protect for no real purpose would be HIGHLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL and incorrigible. Nobody in their right mind (not even Republicans who may have supported him at one time) would stand for something like that. As big a dickhead George W. Bush is and as much as he is dragging America through the mud, he's no Deng Xiaoping, and we do not live in a dictatorship.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 5:27 am
No, we'll never have a dictatorship. Because we won't call it that.
And I never said anything about martial law. Throughout history presidents have canceled or suspended constitutional rights, without being checked, because it was during a time of war. Abe Lincoln suspended habius corpus, which is the law against detaining someone without a warrant. It was against the law to set up japanese internment camps, but after the attack on pearl harbor, there was an excuse.
I personally believe that Bush and the military set up the attack on the twin towers, and used the planes as a distraction/scapegoat. It's not a popular belief, but it's more than possible. They're a shady group, and I wouldn't put it past them to make something up about the elections being a distraction, or unsafe.
Possibility: "We are in a time of war. We can not afford to place a new man in office, to interupt the work we have already done. This operation must continue as planned, if it is to be completed successfully. Operation Iraqi Freedom must continue."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The_Wicked_Man Vice Captain
|
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:11 am
Phoney Bone And I never said anything about martial law. Throughout history presidents have canceled or suspended constitutional rights, without being checked, because it was during a time of war. Abe Lincoln suspended habius corpus, which is the law against detaining someone without a warrant. It was against the law to set up japanese internment camps, but after the attack on pearl harbor, there was an excuse. Suspending habeas corpus or pretty much any of the other emergency wartime powers (other than declaring martial law), including seizing a citizen's property, controlling business and production, assigning military forces in foreign lands, controlling transportation (similar to what Mayor Rudy Guiliani and Governor George Pitaki issued on 9/11 to accomodate police/fire/medical personnel) and communication, or restricting travel to foreign countries cannot do anything to stop an election. Not even the USA PATRIOT Act, for all the raping it has done to the Bill of Rights, cannot exactly be used to stop an election. What's he going to do? Increase surveilance in polling places without people being aware of it? Oooo, somebody is going to use that surveilance footage to accuse people who vote for Howard Dean in 2008 domestic terrorists and lock them away without being granted to a speedy, public trial! As far as conspiracy theories go, this is the most unbelievable one I've stumbled upon. Phoney Bone I personally believe that Bush and the military set up the attack on the twin towers, and used the planes as a distraction/scapegoat. It's not a popular belief, but it's more than possible. They're a shady group, and I wouldn't put it past them to make something up about the elections being a distraction, or unsafe. Possibility: "We are in a time of war. We can not afford to place a new man in office, to interupt the work we have already done. This operation must continue as planned, if it is to be completed successfully. Operation Iraqi Freedom must continue." The entire 9/11 puzzle is more complex than that. Senator Bob Graham even stated on December 11, 2002 on News Hour with Jim Lehrer, "I was surprised at the evidence that there were foreign governments involved in facilitating the activities of at least some of the terrorits in the United States." Unfortunately, the information is classified, but we CAN take an educated guess and say it wasn't Iraq or an enemy nation because any government (especially ours in a period like this) would love to demonize a a country like that. No, the foreign government(s) involved are obviously "allies" who the US does not want to alienate. Something bigger is deffinitely at play. And I really do not believe there are exceptions to Article II, Section I of the US Constitution or the 22nd Amendment. I also do not believe that wartime provisions allow the Executive power to make such an action. And what the hell does urging a country to continue onward in the Iraq conflict have to do with stopping an election? Heck, if you're a conspiracy buff, then you should know that a large majority of the American governing body is part of freemasons and secret societies who, basically, control the world. Did you know that John Kerry and George W. Bush were both part of the secret Order of the Skull and Bones at Yale (I'd recommend you look into the mystery surrounding that group and others)? Everything on the world stage is orchestrated by those groups, and when one secret society member leaves office, another takes his place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 8:27 pm
The_Wicked_Man Phoney Bone ...Which he tried to do, but it was denied. That doesn't mean that he won't use his emergency wartime powers to cancel the next elections. I'm fairly certain that instituting martial law to make sure friendly civilians come nowhere near a high school on Election Day is not the reason why the President was given "emergency wartime powers," not to mention that for an American President to order the military to attack the very people they swore to protect for no real purpose would be HIGHLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL and incorrigible. Nobody in their right mind (not even Republicans who may have supported him at one time) would stand for something like that. As big a dickhead George W. Bush is and as much as he is dragging America through the mud, he's no Deng Xiaoping, and we do not live in a dictatorship. and we dont have such a thing called homeland security and the patriot act, where if i really dont like my neighbor i can call and say they are terrorists and they will be arrested first and then investigated. Hmmm can call and have someone investigated whats that sound like to everyone? If bush wants to suspend the constitution and take away our rights he could and not many people would fight it, specially sincehe would word it doing it for our safety in fighting terrorism blah blah blah blah blah.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 8:29 pm
Phoney Bone No, we'll never have a dictatorship. Because we won't call it that. And I never said anything about martial law. Throughout history presidents have canceled or suspended constitutional rights, without being checked, because it was during a time of war. Abe Lincoln suspended habius corpus, which is the law against detaining someone without a warrant. It was against the law to set up japanese internment camps, but after the attack on pearl harbor, there was an excuse. I personally believe that Bush and the military set up the attack on the twin towers, and used the planes as a distraction/scapegoat. It's not a popular belief, but it's more than possible. They're a shady group, and I wouldn't put it past them to make something up about the elections being a distraction, or unsafe. Possibility: "We are in a time of war. We can not afford to place a new man in office, to interupt the work we have already done. This operation must continue as planned, if it is to be completed successfully. Operation Iraqi Freedom must continue." if they didnt set it up to happen and have anything to do with it happening they sure used it and ran with it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:21 pm
Kadargo If bush wants to suspend the constitution and take away our rights he could and not many people would fight it, specially sincehe would word it doing it for our safety in fighting terrorism blah blah blah blah blah. Since when did the majority of the people in the nation support the Bush administration--especially since dissenters have been speaking out against various sections of the PATRIOT Act (myself included) ever since the law was passed hurriedly two years ago?
|
|
|
|
|
|
The_Wicked_Man Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 1:35 pm
Man, can I get a link to this movie's IMDB page?
It certainly sounds like the most horrifying I have heard about in a long while! wink
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 2:13 am
*tries to ignore all the political debate and actually answer the question put out at the beginning of the topic* Something so scary that it would make the masses want to kill themselves? A mass outbreak of some kind, I should think. Something so horrifying that suicide is preferable to catching the illness. I don't think that a monster would really cause such mass hysteria that everyone would abandon survival instincts in favor of killing themselves. Only something that's so disturbing that it robs someone of all their hope for life, that's usually what makes people want to do themselves in. You'll excuse me for a moment, but I must be a spelling nazi for a second here- Quote: wat would make the world want to kill themself because the ___ is terrable... i believe i should write a book about this topic Quote: What would make the world want to kill themselves because the ___ is terrible? I believe I should write a book about this topic. Sorry...I'm training to be a teacher. Bad spelling bothers the hell out of me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 7:59 am
Phoney Bone Bush somehow getting a third term in office. *twitch and dies*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
